King's College London v/s Manchester

as above

(edited 11 years ago)

I'd go to whichever would offer me an ITU clinical fellowship with my masters (which last time I checked wasn't Manchester).

But since that's not what you need, which one would you rather go?

:rolleyes:

Reply 2

Hantheman

Well, blur are better than Oasis by a significant margin. Therefore, London is better than Manchester. Therefore, Kings is better.

My logic is irrefutable! :biggrin:

Reply 3

RetiredAccount89

Reaper - both are good unis with good reviews. I'd be more inclined to choose based on geography given those choices.

Renal "I'd go to whichever would offer me an ITU clinical fellowship with my masters"
Have you been offered this/got an academic post? WEll done if so.

Reply 4

Casshern1456

I like KCL though it's in London.
On reputation i think it's gotta be KCL.

(edited 13 years ago)

Reply 5

Renal

Original post by Jamie

Renal "I'd go to whichever would offer me an ITU clinical fellowship with my masters"
Have you been offered this/got an academic post? WEll done if so.

Of course not, my academic record is unlikely to get me offered more than remedial training.

Manchester.

Original post by Hantheman

Well, blur are better than Oasis by a significant margin. Therefore, London is better than Manchester. Therefore, Kings is better.

My logic is irrefutable! :biggrin: