Rape or..?
So when I was around the age of 9-ish, I had a friend who lived on my street who was around 4-5 years older than me, so 13/14 or whatever can't remember
one time though we went into his house and to his bedroom, where we was on his bed and he laid down, and he took his pants off with his dick out, and told me to get on which I did (duno if I said anything but I guess I was nervous) then he told me to take my dick out and touch his with it... which I did
looking back I feel sick, and would love to knock him out if I ever saw him again (he's moved) but would you call this rape? or even pedo-ish? who knows what he could be like now..
one time though we went into his house and to his bedroom, where we was on his bed and he laid down, and he took his pants off with his dick out, and told me to get on which I did (duno if I said anything but I guess I was nervous) then he told me to take my dick out and touch his with it... which I did
looking back I feel sick, and would love to knock him out if I ever saw him again (he's moved) but would you call this rape? or even pedo-ish? who knows what he could be like now..
Bit grey area, you don't know if you said anything or not...
He's not a peado.
He's not a peado.
Rape or……Rape.
Original post by The pencil one
Bit grey area, you don't know if you said anything or not...
He's not a peado.
He's not a peado.
Obviously, it is paedophilic.
To the OP, on a serious note, Child on Child sexual assault / rape is probably very under-reported.
Does that mean he is a psychopathic rapist now? No.
However, it is certainly rape if you he penetrated you. I assuming that is what you meant from the first part of what you wrote.
(edited 9 years ago)
Not rape, unless he penetrated you with his penis.
It is, however, sexual assault of a person under 13. Consent isn't relevant in this case.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/7
It is, however, sexual assault of a person under 13. Consent isn't relevant in this case.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/7
Original post by DorianGrayism
Obviously, it is paedophilic.
To the OP, on a serious note, Child on Child sexual assault / rape is probably very under-reported.
Does that mean he is a psychopathic rapist now? No.
However, it is certainly rape if you he penetrated you. I assuming that is what you meant from the first part of what you wrote.
To the OP, on a serious note, Child on Child sexual assault / rape is probably very under-reported.
Does that mean he is a psychopathic rapist now? No.
However, it is certainly rape if you he penetrated you. I assuming that is what you meant from the first part of what you wrote.
It's not according to Wikipedia.
Original post by DorianGrayism
Obviously, it is paedophilic.
How is it paedophillic? The other guy was 13 ffs. And also it would not be rape if he did not resist, op didnt say anything about being forced or anything.
Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by 2710
How is it paedophillic? The other guy was 13 ffs. And also it would not be rape if he did not resist, op didnt say anything about being forced or anything.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
He is an adolescent who has probably undergone puberty. Hence that would make it paedophilic.
Also, it is always rape with a 9 year old if you penetrate them. That should be obvious.
Original post by DorianGrayism
He is an adolescent who has probably undergone puberty. Hence that would make it paedophilic.
Also, it is always rape with a 9 year old if you penetrate them. That should be obvious.
Also, it is always rape with a 9 year old if you penetrate them. That should be obvious.
Yes then you need to look up the definition of pedophillia. I mean the other guy hasn't even reached the age of consent yet!
According to your logic two 13 year olds who slept with each other would both be hebephiles.....
And regarding your last comment. So you are saying two 9 year olds who decide to have sex with each other is rape? It definitely is a grey area and I would not readily call it 'obvious'.
Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 9 years ago)
He didn't penetrate me, just touched his dick with mine..
as I said I was around 8 or 9 and he woulda been 13/14
as I said I was around 8 or 9 and he woulda been 13/14
Original post by 2710
According to your logic two 13 year olds who slept with each other would both be hebephiles.....
And regarding your last comment. So you are saying two 9 year olds who decide to have sex with each other is rape? It definitely is a grey area and I would not readily call it 'obvious'.
Posted from TSR Mobile
And regarding your last comment. So you are saying two 9 year olds who decide to have sex with each other is rape? It definitely is a grey area and I would not readily call it 'obvious'.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Stop changing your argument as you go along. First, you stated that a 9 year old that does not resist is not rape. Obviously that is wrong because a 9 year old cannot consent in any case to having sex with a 13 year old.
This case involves a 9 year old and a 13 year old. Not a 13 year old and 13 year old. Not a 9 year old and 9 year old. A 9 year old cannot consent. The 13 year old is the one initiating in this case and is therefore the aggressor.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by DorianGrayism
Stop changing your argument as you go along. First, you stated that a 9 year old that does not resist is not rape. Obviously that is wrong because a 9 year old cannot consent in any case to having sex with a 13 year old.
This case involves a 9 year old and a 13 year old. Not a 13 year old and 13 year old. Not a 9 year old and 9 year old. A 9 year old cannot consent. The 13 year old is the one initiating in this case and is therefore the aggressor.
This case involves a 9 year old and a 13 year old. Not a 13 year old and 13 year old. Not a 9 year old and 9 year old. A 9 year old cannot consent. The 13 year old is the one initiating in this case and is therefore the aggressor.
I am not changing my argument. My post was manipulated to counter your last response of 'Any penetration of a 9 year old is rape'.
Would you consider a 10 year old with a 9 year old rape? Im am not suggesting that it is or it isnt rape, after further thought, but what is the difference between a 13 year old and a 9 year old in terms of the law?
Edit: after some internet searching, I was not able to find the answer. But I just find it hard to believe that the 'rape' word is so easily flung around especially when both parties are at such a young age and do not really know what they are doing. And tbh I do not want to any more of my time researching child rape lol.
Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by 2710
I am not changing my argument. My post was manipulated to counter your last response of 'Any penetration of a 9 year old is rape'.
Would you consider a 10 year old with a 9 year old rape? Im am not suggesting that it is or it isnt rape, after further thought, but what is the difference between a 13 year old and a 9 year old in terms of the law?
Edit: after some internet searching, I was not able to find the answer. But I just find it hard to believe that the 'rape' word is so easily flung around especially when both parties are at such a young age and do not really know what they are doing. And tbh I do not want to any more of my time researching child rape lol.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Would you consider a 10 year old with a 9 year old rape? Im am not suggesting that it is or it isnt rape, after further thought, but what is the difference between a 13 year old and a 9 year old in terms of the law?
Edit: after some internet searching, I was not able to find the answer. But I just find it hard to believe that the 'rape' word is so easily flung around especially when both parties are at such a young age and do not really know what they are doing. And tbh I do not want to any more of my time researching child rape lol.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Depends on who the aggressor or what happened.
A 13 year old is older than a 9 year old. Therefore, the onus is on the 13 year old to know the difference between right and wrong. Just because they haven't reached the age of consent does not mean that all responsibility disappears.
due to the age difference I'd definitey say it's sexual assault, 13/14 is old enough to understand sex and what he was doing and that a 9 year old is not old enough
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Why do some soldiers rape?
- Does Warwick still have a rape culture?
- Is it alright if my boyfriend slaps me?
- Participants needed!!
- Participants needed
- Examples of unjust laws in the UK
- Students accused of rape at university bringing lawyers to hearings
- Unconscious bias - is it time to rethink how we address VAWG?
- Master's Dissertation Participants
- an inspector calls seven deadly sins
- Compelling personal reasona
- Prime - law work experience!!!
- Capital Punishment Survey
- Atonement question about concealment
- can someone give feedback on my eng lit essay?
- can someone give me feedback and help on my eng lit essay? (A level)
- Harvey Weinstein’s New York convictions quashed by state’s apex court
- could i talk about sexualisation in my gcse english speech?
- Is it funny for the home secretrary to make such jokes?
- Gf got spiked on holiday
Latest
Trending
Last reply 6 days ago
My friend might be getting extra time and i hate it.Last reply 6 days ago
Just found out about UCL stat test but can't afford to sit itLast reply 2 weeks ago
Dad keeps criticising my university degree choiceLast reply 3 weeks ago
Is this pathetic or genuinely something to be upset aboutTrending
Last reply 6 days ago
My friend might be getting extra time and i hate it.Last reply 6 days ago
Just found out about UCL stat test but can't afford to sit itLast reply 2 weeks ago
Dad keeps criticising my university degree choiceLast reply 3 weeks ago
Is this pathetic or genuinely something to be upset about
