Grades: IB 45 points with Biology, Chemistry and Math at HL and Economics, English and Chinese at SL.
Universities: Cambridge, LSE, St Andrews (offered), UCL, Warwick (offered).
My dream choice is Cambridge but I've gotten around to thinking extensively about my other choices so that I can merely treat Cambridge as a bonus should I be fortunate enough to get in, seeing how admissions to Cambridge is a bit of a wildcard. Apart from Cambridge, I'm applying to LSE, St Andrews, Warwick and UCL. So far I've already gotten my unconditional offers from SA and Warwick, and I am somewhat assured of my chances at the other two universities which haven't responded.
I'm applying for Economics, and I'm torn between two choices. LSE and St Andrews.
From what I gather (correct me if I'm wrong), LSE is the clear contender for the university that offers the best undergradute Economics course in terms of quality and prestige, rivalling and to some people even outperforming Cambridge. However, I dislike the prospect of living right in the heart of a busy city like London, surrounded by people who are very career-driven and wish little more out of their degree than a job in finance or the like.
I am greatly leaning towards St Andrews as it fits the bill for me; a quiet seaside town that has lots of history behind it, and quite prestigious in terms of reputation and entry standards. However, I am very particular about the quality of learning i get at my prospective university. One big thing about studying in Scotland is that I have to do 4 years. Also, St Andrews has a modular system of learning very much like the liberal arts education in the US which may be a good thing to some but not much so to me. I am very certain of what I want to study, so I believe I would benefit less from mucking about choosing modules in my first 2 years. I am also suspicious that the teaching quality might suffer looking at the sheer volume of modules the university offers. It seems that teaching quality might vary based on the module you're taking and who is teaching it, and I feel a rigid 3-year course like that in the UK would be much better structured and optimized with a single department poring over every detail. I know league tables can be a bit meaningless to some people, but the placing of St Andrews in various categories seems to fluctuate a lot. In the UK, I can always be certain that universities like LSE and Cambridge will pop up in the top 10, if not the top 5. Sometimes St Andrews shows up near the top, but there have been cases where I find it lagging behind in the 30th or 40th place.
I would greatly appreciate your advice on this (and please chime in if you feel I've unfairly discounted UCL and Warwick as contenders too!).