Why I will be avoiding promiscious girls for marraige.

x

And I suppose that you'll be a virgin before marriage too then?

Edit: Reverse-searched that chart (which has spelt *happiness incorrectly) and this is what the stupid article says...


"Nah, I don’t even blame women for being such filthy whores.
What are they supposed to do? Stay virgins until they’re 35?


The above chart shows we need to go back to virgin marriages if we wish to have a stable social order, and this means marrying these girls off within a year – two years, max – of their first period. Then they can get pregnant when their bodies are telling them they need to get pregnant – the life stage at which at female mammals get pregnant – and bond properly with a man. They will then avoid the sick mental illness that goes along with female childlessness.

There is really no reason whatsoever to educate women. What purpose does it serve? Yeah, they should learn all the things in school you learn before puberty – reading, writing, basic math – but after that, it is really hard to make an argument they need more formal education. If they’re inclined, they can read books to learn more informations. Or they can just do what women like to do and produce and raise babies, decorate the house and gossip with other women about trivial matters.".

Erm, well I don't want a man who thinks like that either.

Your strawman was a bit too much...

Why would virgin marriages require marrying girls one or two years max off their first period? lmao

Stop overdoing it and trying to turn it into some feminist issue. Virgin marriages may be more successful but all the stuff about education and crap was just irrelevant.

You confused, silly human. The chart was what OP posted, and I quoted the article it was sourced from. If you put your glasses on, you might even see my usage of quotation marks. I didn't turn it into any issue.

We on TSR are supposed to care because..?????

And I suppose that you'll be a virgin before marriage too then?

Edit: Reverse-searched that chart (which has spelt *happiness incorrectly) and this is what the stupid article says...


"Nah, I don’t even blame women for being such filthy whores.
What are they supposed to do? Stay virgins until they’re 35?

The above chart shows we need to go back to virgin marriages if we wish to have a stable social order, and this means marrying these girls off within a year – two years, max – of their first period. Then they can get pregnant when their bodies are telling them they need to get pregnant – the life stage at which at female mammals get pregnant – and bond properly with a man. They will then avoid the sick mental illness that goes along with female childlessness.

There is really no reason whatsoever to educate women. What purpose does it serve? Yeah, they should learn all the things in school you learn before puberty – reading, writing, basic math – but after that, it is really hard to make an argument they need more formal education. If they’re inclined, they can read books to learn more informations. Or they can just do what women like to do and produce and raise babies, decorate the house and gossip with other women about trivial matters.".

Erm, well I don't want a man who thinks like that either.

you're lowkey triggered because the stats are exposing you