Hi!
Great choices! I took a history module in university too
Do not worry, there is no such thing as too many questions (unless it is on a test or quiz you are marked on)!
I am here to help, after all
1. I took Government and Politics, Psychology, English Literature, and Sociology. While that was a decent mix, the A-levels I would recommend are Government and Politics, History, foreign languages, Philosophy, Economics, Sociology, and Mathematics. Other subjects like Geography, Psychology, Law or English Literature are viable options too, though they are not as helpful in the degree itself (you will get in with those A-levels, though). Just pick any three out of all these and you will be more than fine.
2. I study International Relations, but I can answer this anyway since International Relations is just an area of Politics.
Typical topics that a Politics or International Relations student studies include, but are not limited to democracy, political parties, institutions of democracy, regional politics, political theory, political philosophy, international organisations, political research, power politics, policy, conflict and war studies, human rights, environmental politics, and security studies. This is more or less the same as International Relations, just on a less global scale. What your course contains depends on the modules you have at your university. To exemplify, I am not going to take a single power politics or policy module during my degree, but that is only because I chose my modules to avoid those topics as they do not interest me personally.
The workload consists of reading, mostly.
Reading around the topic, both for assignments and for the exams, is important. Keeping up with the news helps too.
As for the assignments, most of my assignments are essays. Some were presentations and a few were tests. In one module, 5% of my grade was participation.
In most seminars/classes, we go over the lecture material and discuss a topic the teacher chose. In lectures, we spend most of the time listening to the lecturer and making notes, but there have been instances when we were prompted to give examples or discuss.
Is that everything you wanted to know about what studying Politics is like? If not, feel free to ask for information on anything I did not touch upon
3. My favourite parts of politics are democracy, conflict resolution, and security studies.
My interest in those is a main reason why I chose to study my degree.
4. For your personal statement and preparation for the course, I suggest reading a few books about politics and international relations (3-5 should be more than fine), doing work experience with your MP (if you would be interested in this, email your MP straight away, since it will probably take them a while to respond; mine took six months before I could do the day of work experience I did), joining a society or club (the debating society would be good, though any other society/club works; I was in the writing club and it did not prevent me from getting an offer), participating in a Model United Nations (I took part in UWE's MUN in November of my AS year), joining a political party if you want to, any school extracurriculars (like being a class rep, student ambassador for your school or part of the school newspaper if you have one), volunteering (bonus points if it is for charity), fundraising if possible, being part of the UK Youth Parliament, and doing the NCS. There are a lot of other things you can do (e.g. extracurricular courses, learning a language, debating and writing competitions, etc) and politics is not particularly picky, so feel free to engage in whatever activity you like and which you could use on your personal statement. However, do not think of this as a checklist; you do not have to do all or most of these things. I did not do all of them either. In fact, I did most of them and had to leave out some of them because I did too much to list everything on my personal statement. This is just a list of things you could do, not a list of things you should or need to do.
I view feminism as a misunderstood theory which is not being applied in the right places. Feminism actually advises for equality between men and women, but some modern radical 'feminists' are basically female supremacists who want everything to be better for women than for men (a.k.a. unequal and unfair to men), which is not what feminism was meant to be. It does not help that most feminists are from and in countries where feminism is not exactly necessary anymore while places which truly need women's rights and feminism are lacking in terms of feminism. Yes, there are some feminist issues even in modern day UK and US (e.g. higher salary average for men than women), but they are nowhere near as glaring as those in other countries.
I think men and women are equal in front of the law. That being said, I believe true equality does not exist. If it existed, I believe it would be completely unjust and unfair. Some people are smarter, some are prettier, some are stronger, some are richer, and so on, and none of these differences can be ameliorated easily and perfectly, so I accept that inequality is a natural and unavoidable state. To exemplify, in the case of men and women, men tend to be physically stronger than women on average (there are women who are physically stronger than most men, but that is because of years of working out, not biology), so I do not see men and women as equal in biological terms, though they seem to be equal in most other aspects.
We tend to think that inequality is bad, but when you think about it, equality can be even less fair than inequality at times. True equality would imply everyone having the same salary, for example, but that would be completely unfair to people who worked hard to get a job that requires better qualifications. A doctor should not be paid the same as a cleaner, after all, and I am sure everyone can agree on that. However, that very thought, that some people should have better salaries, implies that equality would not be fair and is therefore not the recommended course of action.
In fact, most 'equality' things are actually equity things. A lot of projects meant to equalise life opportunities for young people regardless of their background are branded as 'equality', but in reality, what they promote is equity, not equality.
Thus, I believe in equity over equality. Fairness should be the focus, not equality. Equality is impossible, but equity is not.
To summarise: I think feminism is now used in a context far from its original meaning and that it is not in the right places and that men and women are equal in front of the law.