Back
to top
STEP 1 clock geometry / calculus problem
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
STEP 1 2004 Question 4:
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
0
reply
Report
#2
(Original post by jameshyland29)
STEP 1 2004 Question 4:
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
STEP 1 2004 Question 4:
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
as a whole?
0
reply
Report
#3
(Original post by jameshyland29)
STEP 1 2004 Question 4:
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
STEP 1 2004 Question 4:
https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com...20STEP%201.pdf
I'm struggling to see how the first and second derivatives relate to the rate of increase of x here.
My first idea was to try to consider the numerator of the first derivative, dx/d(theta), which is absin(theta), and since ab is constant and positive, deduce that the rate of increase of x must be greatest when sin(theta) is greatest at pi/2. This doesn't lead to the expression sought, but is it otherwise technically correct?
Thanks.
0
reply
(Original post by DFranklin)
No, it's incorrect. You have to consider the whole fraction, not just the numerator (assuming your denominator isn't constant w.r.t. theta).
No, it's incorrect. You have to consider the whole fraction, not just the numerator (assuming your denominator isn't constant w.r.t. theta).
Thanks.
0
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by jameshyland29)
Ahh I see (I think!), so I guess that's because of the almost alternating nature of cos and sin -- I mean, if the term in the denominator was also sin(theta) rather than cos(theta), then might it be possible to see at a glance that dx/d(theta) would be a maximum when theta = pi/2?
Thanks.
Ahh I see (I think!), so I guess that's because of the almost alternating nature of cos and sin -- I mean, if the term in the denominator was also sin(theta) rather than cos(theta), then might it be possible to see at a glance that dx/d(theta) would be a maximum when theta = pi/2?
Thanks.
, at which point looking at the denominator (i.e. 1) doesn't tell you anything useful.
0
reply
(Original post by DFranklin)
No, it's got nothing to do with sin and cos. You can't possibly ignore the denominator when looking for the minimum/maximum value. To see why this can't work, note that, for example, every function f(x)/g(x) can be written as, at which point looking at the denominator (i.e. 1) doesn't tell you anything useful.
No, it's got nothing to do with sin and cos. You can't possibly ignore the denominator when looking for the minimum/maximum value. To see why this can't work, note that, for example, every function f(x)/g(x) can be written as
, at which point looking at the denominator (i.e. 1) doesn't tell you anything useful.
g(x) = f(x) / (3 + f(x))
so that g(x) is always a maximum when f(x) is a maximum. Would there be any reason to bother taking the second derivative to find the maximum in such a case?
Thanks.
0
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by jameshyland29)
Sorry I wasn't very clear before, I meant could you essentially "ignore" the denominator if the only variable it contains is the same variable as in the numerator, so that both numerator and denominator increase together, for instance:
g(x) = f(x) / (3 + f(x))
so that g(x) is always a maximum when f(x) is a maximum. Would there be any reason to bother taking the second derivative to find the maximum in such a case?
Thanks.
Sorry I wasn't very clear before, I meant could you essentially "ignore" the denominator if the only variable it contains is the same variable as in the numerator, so that both numerator and denominator increase together, for instance:
g(x) = f(x) / (3 + f(x))
so that g(x) is always a maximum when f(x) is a maximum. Would there be any reason to bother taking the second derivative to find the maximum in such a case?
Thanks.
There are scenarios where it does work, but you would need to justify why a particular expression was one of them.
1
reply
Report
#8
Obviously agree with the comments about having to consider the whole fraction, in general.
Have you managed to solve the question by doing this? Just been through it and its not too bad once you get started.
Have you managed to solve the question by doing this? Just been through it and its not too bad once you get started.
0
reply
(Original post by DFranklin)
*Still* no. E.g. consider f(x)/(1+f(x)^2). Numerator and denominator are both maximized when f(x) is, but the function as a whole is maximized when f(x)=1.
There are scenarios where it does work, but you would need to justify why a particular expression was one of them.
*Still* no. E.g. consider f(x)/(1+f(x)^2). Numerator and denominator are both maximized when f(x) is, but the function as a whole is maximized when f(x)=1.
There are scenarios where it does work, but you would need to justify why a particular expression was one of them.
(Original post by mqb2766)
Obviously agree with the comments about having to consider the whole fraction, in general.
Have you managed to solve the question by doing this? Just been through it and its not too bad once you get started.
Obviously agree with the comments about having to consider the whole fraction, in general.
Have you managed to solve the question by doing this? Just been through it and its not too bad once you get started.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by jameshyland29)
Got it. Thanks.
Thanks for the reply. Do you mean have I solved it by considering the whole fraction and determining its maximum value by inspection? If so I just tried it and it seems rather hard but I'm clear about why it's rarely the best idea to attempt such a thing now, which is the main thing!
Got it. Thanks.
Thanks for the reply. Do you mean have I solved it by considering the whole fraction and determining its maximum value by inspection? If so I just tried it and it seems rather hard but I'm clear about why it's rarely the best idea to attempt such a thing now, which is the main thing!
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Have your say on 2021 assessmentOfqual and DfE want students' thoughts
- Who has received uni offers?
- Starting my new job - AMA!
- Win a year of Headspace
- Private candidates support thread