Sorry, yes, it's worth clarifying! The current set of statistics is based on the last DHLE survey. Firstly, that data is based on responses to questions asked to graduates of each course. Naturally, a very small percentage respond to emails and phone calls, so figures can be skewed higher or lower with a couple of unusual responses.
The last DHLE definition of employment or further study includes:
1) Work and further study includes those who reported that they were in full-time paid work only (including self-employed), part-time paid work only, voluntary/unpaid work only plus work and further study.
2) Further study only includes those who gave their employment circumstances as temporarily sick or unable to work/looking after the home or family, not employed but not looking for employment, further study or training, or something else, and who were also either in full-time or part-time study, training or research. It also includes those who were due to start a job within the next month or unemployed and looking for employment, further study or training, and who were also in full-time study, training or research.
So a course could have a figure of 98% of graduates in work of full-time study (which looks very impressive to applicants and parents) yet almost all of them could be in unskilled part-time work and/or "unemployed and looking for employment". Also, graduate pay is so low in the art and design sector, that students in unskilled work may well be earning more than those working in top-end design agencies. I'm sure this data might be useful in assessing which business school to attend, for example, but for art and design subjects it's almost meaningless.