A good question. the ECHR protects freedom of thought and expression, and there are many challenges that threaten these. To what extent is freedom of thought compatible with mass misinformation and distortion of public debate? We all have freedom of speech as long as we're talking to ourselves in private, the pressing issue about freedom not to speak but to be heard. Someone who is 'de-platformed' isn't prevented from speaking, they're prevented from being heard. How should the freedom to be heard be balanced with other freedoms and rights, and how equally should it be distributed? Should your freedom to be heard depend on having powerful friends, on saying something trendy, on supporting the superrich who control resources, or perhaps on the merits of what you've got to say, or on something else? Or should freedom to be heard be equally distributed perhaps, so that everyone has their 15 minutes of fame to say their piece, and no more?