When evaluating a study and looking at the sample, does it fit more with generalizability, internal validity, or external validity?
I thought it might be internal because a varied sample size keeps things fair, but then external makes sense too, because it's about whether the study's findings can apply to people than the original sample.
There's also generalisability - but I was told that a varied sample doesn't always mean high generalisability (I'm not sure why that is though)
Could anyone please help?