Murray may not have dished out too many bagels compared to the others, but he's not received that many himself. Nadal,on the other hand, despite his winning records against the other top guys, has actually been bagelled quite a few times.
Yeah, but I think with his slam wins now he is getting a bit more popular.
To me, and probably others, his style is the most negative of the big 4, his second serve lately is becoming ridiculously slow (60mph seriously? ), and whilst I believe nole nadal and fed will end in the top 5 grand slam winners in the open era, Murray at best would finish with 10.. although over the next 3 years it should be Murray vs djokovic with cameos from nadal on clay and federer at the odd tourney.
To me, and probably others, his style is the most negative of the big 4, his second serve lately is becoming ridiculously slow (60mph seriously? ), and whilst I believe nole nadal and fed will end in the top 5 grand slam winners in the open era, Murray at best would finish with 10.. although over the next 3 years it should be Murray vs djokovic with cameos from nadal on clay and federer at the odd tourney.
true, murray is the least entertaining player out of the 'big 4' IMO
he certainly lacks interesting match-ups compared to the other 3 guys
The big one he is having atm with djokovic will always result in close matches. They're literally the same style, having amazing returns which results in long service games throughout
The big one he is having atm with djokovic will always result in close matches. They're literally the same style, having amazing returns which results in long service games throughout
Interesting to read that after playing a total of one match under Connors' guidance (granted she did lose), Sharapova has decided to part company with him. Got to be one of the shortest stints as a tennis coach?
To me, and probably others, his style is the most negative of the big 4, his second serve lately is becoming ridiculously slow (60mph seriously? ), and whilst I believe nole nadal and fed will end in the top 5 grand slam winners in the open era, Murray at best would finish with 10.. although over the next 3 years it should be Murray vs djokovic with cameos from nadal on clay and federer at the odd tourney.
Fed and Nadal be it age or injury are unlikely to be able to keep dominance enough to compete. Rather i suspect that Djokovic and Del Potro will compete on clay and indoors and all 3 on hard and grass.
The big 4 for me is essentially moving towards a big 3.
The disappointing thing is all the really young news guys are crap on clay (though it does make Raonic and Nikishori that bit more impressive at their current rankings)..
Fed and Nadal be it age or injury are unlikely to be able to keep dominance enough to compete. Rather i suspect that Djokovic and Del Potro will compete on clay and indoors and all 3 on hard and grass.
The big 4 for me is essentially moving towards a big 3.
The disappointing thing is all the really young news guys are crap on clay (though it does make Raonic and Nikishori that bit more impressive at their current rankings)..
I'm waiting for the next Spanish wizard, there seems to be none coming through.
The disappointing thing is all the really young news guys are crap on clay (though it does make Raonic and Nikishori that bit more impressive at their current rankings)..