Although I've never read these texts, I'll try to give you some advice. I got 27/30 in my first draft of the A2 coursework this year, so hopefully what I say will be somewhat useful.
Your question:To what extent do you agree that both of these novels dramatise the price of scientific knowledge?
I've emboldened the key words of your question. Let's start with 'extent'. This is a very important word because it is inviting you into a debate, an argument and a discussion. You need to constantly consider how far these two novels dramatise the price of scientific knowledge. There is no use in saying they do or they do not - you should be
arguing whether they completely do it, partially or fail to do it.
To help you argue, you want to consider alternative ideas and then evaluate them - weigh them up against each other and see which is more credible (and, ultimately, makes more sense). This is where you have to be creative and just think about what someone else might say - and also why. Is there any language, structure, form or contextual factors that give reason to the interpretations of others? You should discuss and address these.
Then, you should say why this interpretation is not very strong and why another interpretation - or other interpretations - are more reliable. Perhaps one interpretation is very strong to the modern reader, but if we consider the context in which the novel has been published we realise that there is not really much substance to that idea.
Dramatise is an important word, because you need to look how they are doing this. You can't merely list ideas and reasons - you should be exploring different elements of language, structure and form and seeing how these symbolise/represent/portray etc. scientific knowledge.
Then, of course, 'price' is important. You should show your examiner what 'the price of scientific knowledge' means to you. What does it mean to have a price? If you define this in your introduction, you can always reference this throughout your essay and this will help you to evaluate in your essay.
General Tips:- Make sure you
analyse rather than explain.
- Use technical language so that you can fulfil the criteria for AO1.
- Always maintain an argumentative tone. Don't describe or list ideas; discuss them.
- Move away from the obvious and the surface of the texts and explore the hidden meanings.
- Explore the agenda of the writer - why the writer has used particular archetypes, structural flourishes, turning points and so on. Remember, in English Literature, everything the writer does has a purpose. As a critic, your job is to debate what this purpose is.
- Don't use context aimlessly. As I have been told, always use context to
support your points, rather than to
make your points.
- Evaluate! Consider different interpretations, thoroughly explore how and why they can be formed, and once you have explored them, then say which is more credible.
- Compare the two texts, but don't get bodged down by comparison. Feel free to explore some points as individual entities without convoluting them into comparisons.