Which part don’t you get amigo?
It’s an inexorable by-product of factors integral to encouraging celebration of/active immersion in/inculcation of diversity, inclusiveness, and cultural exchange. I’d have thought you’d be broadly supportive (except in instances of clear bigotry/disrespect)
I have some sympathy for them in this respect, but how is Kim doing any of those things in dressing up as Princess Jasmine?
You have rather a rare and idiosyncratic definition of exploitation if it includes replication, imitation, and satire, my love
Thank you
You can’t have it both ways sugar. Either all cultural appropriation is wrong, or just the type that involves intentional mocking (Kim cannot be included in this, narrower, sub-definition)
So you would never do such a thing again? Darling, have you
seen your own avatar!?
Actually, you’re not far wrong, as it turns out – it appears she was Ptolemaic (Macedonian) Greek in descent, and you are Levantine (from a people who originate from SE Europe, the Levant, and semitic regions that extend into what was the Ptolemaic kingdom)
Imitating the character ostensively serves as to condone/lend support to Disney/American cultural appropriation
Yet you’re happy to dress up as, and fantasize about acting out, her character
Exotic simply means foreign and (hence) unusual. It’s a novelty/charm factor, but not predicated on any particular fetish necessarily
So long as our desires remain aligned this question is moot; should there be any divergence, well, then we can have a conversation
Yet you don’t want to live in a world devoid of classic comedy and satire, so you self-evidently do see how positive (energy) comes of it. I think part of the problem here is that you’re putting out a very confused message as to what you mean by cultural appropriation. Additionally, you must see how for a character like Kim or Lawrence, a lot of ‘good’ comes, from their POV/that of their fans/followers, from their cultural appropriation
That, and, more to the point, the fact they’re paranoid about falling foul of anti-discrimination and anti-terror legislation (providing a platform for prejudice and extremism)
Have y’all never heard women going on about men? Truth is the worst slurs on both genders tend to come from women. Are we crying about it? Nope. We suck it up and laugh at them/ourselves, no problem. It’s called stiff upper lip + self-deprecation, two
very British traits
1) What does minority vs. majority status have to do with anything?
2) What is wrong with a little light teasing/satire?
3) What about members of ‘minority’ groups who mock/satirise their own culture?
4) Where do you draw the line with 'appropriation' e.g. along civilisational lines, regional, national, linguistic, local-geographic, ethnic, tribal?
5) What happened to the ‘one world’ paradigm, and the denial of the ‘them and us’ (only applies when it suits certain ‘progressive’ narratives)?
What of the billions of non-Western people who form majorities in their own lands who have appropriated Western cultural elements with little or no understanding of such things. Are they committing some kind of sin too e.g. by trying to join us in the 21st century/better their societies/lives?
Absolutely agree, but they have the law to protect them at any rate, and safe spaces in the form of private/membership based counselling, peer-support, clubs, groups, meetings, and venues, but not on taxpayer/tuition fee payer time, money, facilities, and not to the exclusion of others who have every right to make full use of such resources, and engage freely in public forums (a hard fought right, under international law),
hell no!