Israeli Soldier Elor Azaria Guilty of Manslaughter of Disarmed Palestinian

Bruh a few pages back i remember you saying to someone they supported islamic extremism by them simply having a post criticizing Israel, which was probably down to their tsr username .

I have a good memory hmmmmmmmmmmmm

Yes, his username sounded Muslim.

In any case, race and religion isn't the same thing.

The problem with international law is that it's based on nothing apart from the cultural values of those people making them. It's a complete Emperor has no clothes scenario, as soon as one person points out that it's a load of made up crap, it falls apart. At least with Islam it had internally solid foundations.

Nonsense, when China rules the world the relevance of universal humanist morality will fade away. Chinese people have empathy, but they don't have this exclusively Western drive to make everyone else like them and they will pursue a foreign policy based on rational self-interest as opposed to arbitrary principles elevated to a position of absolutism.

It's only a problem if you think that the "cultural values" of the people making international law, and that the general principles of the law across civilised societies are not progressively getting closer towards the ideal, which can be derived from the foundational ethics of most societies even if said societies don't adhere to them.



Then the Chinese government would be acting in an unethical manner; self-interest, especially at the expense of others would be contrary to Confucian ethics, which is again ultimately a consequence of evolutionary psychology culminating in common virtues across societies.

The problem with justifying a position by appealing to the foundational ethics is it just changing the question from "is the position correct" to "are the ethics correct"

Posted from TSR Mobile

Why does international law apply over Shariah? International law is so arbitrary, whereas Shariah is internally consistent in that it's claimed to have been derived from an absolute authority.

AFAIK Islamic military jurisprudence (in particular the Hanafi school) holds that POWs must not be executed, and must be "treated well", albeit kept in slavery...

A good terrorist is a dead terrorist.

Sadly, now, more than ever, the UN is dominated by a coalition of Jew-hating, biased countries which have a politically motivated agenda against Israel.

Not really. It seems to me that Israel is criticised simply for defending itself.

Israel is a liberal democracy which protects the freedoms of its citizens from filthy Islamic terrorists.

Doesn't surprise me that a Muslim poster such as yourself would show solidarity with violent jihadists.

Except, I rejected the implication of your question. You're implying that the criticism Israel gets is fair, which it is not. It is fighting an Islamofascist movement which wants it to be wiped off the face of the earth and it shows an immense amount of restraint in the face of such a threat.

u fool, stop spewing out sh it and sit ur little white ass down about matters which u know nothing about

Funny how you linked to Israeli news articles, and not, say, Iranian or Saudi ones. Maybe because Israel has a free press unlike its enemies?

LOOOLLL Are u actually reading the bs ur typing??? U racist brainshwashed ignorant halfwit. Keep getting brainwashed by white/Jewish controlled media u sheep and keep thinking all Muslims are terrorists. U do know the 72 virgin thing isn't an Islamic belief but an extremist one?? u fool, stop spewing out sh it and sit ur little white ass down about matters which u know nothing about

Rule of law should not apply to enemy combatants

Are you reading what you're writing?

It doesn't surprise me that the anti-white and anti-Semitic racists have been drawn to this thread like moths to a flame.

No equivalence between a brave Israeli soldier killing terrorists and a filthy Palestinian Islamist militant.