Original post by megalouSo I did The A Level exam, Othello, Tess, and Death of a Salesman. I thought that the extract was nice and I was able to link it to the rest of the play relatively easily. I was worried that I wouldn’t be able to place the extract in the context of the play but actually Act 2 Scene 1 was nice. There were some nice things to talk about for AO2 although I probably should have emphasised the importance of setting more. AO3 I found harder to link to the extract, other than talking about the nature of Shakespeare’s plays, so I’d be interested to know what other people put context-wise if they did that question! AO4 was relatively straightforward, talked about Iago as a tragic villain/nemesis figure, disorder/chaos, blindness, and the nature of Othello as a tragic hero and his hamartia.
For Section B I chose the question on Emilia. This one I found very difficult to answer because I didn’t take long enough to plan. But I talked about the role of agency in undermining or increasing her status as a tragic victim, and whether her complicity in Iago’s manipulation of Othello and Cassio made her less of a victim. I touched upon her symbolism in the play as a piece of social commentary, and how she could be compared to Bianca and Desdemona in terms of how they all represent aspects of femininity, and highlight the inherent contradictions of the patriarchy. This then linked back to the idea of the inevitability of fate and how Emilia therefore contributes to the feel that Othello’s fate is inescapable. I talked about how her unwillingness to accept her inferiority led to her outspokenness and defiance of her husband and how this contributed to the ‘pushing against’ of society, causing disorder and chaos. In hindsight I wish I’d made more reference to dramatic methods, however, and talked about the significance of the handkerchief in how all three women touch it, demonstrating how the tragedy worsens as Othello believes the physical manifestation of Desdemona’s fidelity has been tainted by the hands of all three women - but mostly against their choosing.
For Section C I found it quite tricky to apply to Tess of the d’Urbervilles, although in fairness I did talk about DOAS more. I discussed Willy’s tragic greatness and the idea that in a domestic tragedy, he has the greatness of a traditional tragic hero through the image he has cultivated for himself in his own home, and how this image ultimately stems from a sense of self-importance. I talked about how hubris can only be present according to Aristotle if it is in the form of a tragic flaw, and how Willy’s hubris leads him to believe he can be successful, leading to the sense of waste at the end as Happy follows in his father’s footsteps. For AO3 I talked about the American Dream and capitalism, although I wish I’d stated more explicitly how this inherently perpetuates the kind of narcissism and arrogance you see in Willy Loman. There was another point I made about pride that I don’t quite remember...
For Tess, I interpreted her pride more akin to ‘dignity’ and how she wants to preserve that. I don’t remember exactly what I said about that point though!! I then countered that by arguing that Tess is more a victim of others’ pride - namely Alec and Angel, although had I not run out of time I would have discussed the importance of Joan and John Durbeyfield too - and how their selfish pride contrasted against Tess’s moral dignity and therefore elevated her. So yeah, I came to the conclusion that in DOAS Willy’s pride diminishes him, as it makes him blind and selfish and since it is the cause of his tragic downfall (by the nature of hubris), it is the reason for his fall from greatness. In Tess, it elevates her because it is not present in excess, while the selfish pride of other characters makes her look better.
I’m a little worried about how that exam went though, because I know my head got a little muddled and I honestly can’t remember how accurately and fluently I expressed those points. I got out of the exam and had a cry with my teacher, lol.
But yeah I thought my best question was the extract, and then Section B probably my worst - I was thrown by the weird question, and didn’t take enough time to plan, which I think probably had a knock-on effect on Section C. But I’m hoping it went better than I think, and I think the next paper (we do crime) will be nicer because it’s more free to choose which question you want to do, and the Section C has to be applicable to about 6 different texts!!