The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

smart ppl r smart enough to know that u have to learn the mark scheme to do well and therefore they do well
Original post by Retired_Messiah
"technically correct" would be the same as a "correct" one. If it wasn't the correct answer it wouldn't be technically correct. But the technically correct would become "wrong" because of pure exam technique rather than anything to do with one's biology proficiency.

You mean the exam technique of accurately selecting specific terms, concepts and examples in your answer? That seems entirely fair.
Original post by Retired_Messiah
"technically correct" would be the same as a "correct" one. If it wasn't the correct answer it wouldn't be technically correct. But the technically correct would become "wrong" because of pure exam technique rather than anything to do with one's biology proficiency.

Thing is with stupid things like that, basically nobody gets those marks so it doesn't really matter. Our physics teacher looked at a break down of the AS paper average marks per question part and some of the averages were like 0.1/2 XD.
Original post by Tolgarda
You mean the exam technique of accurately selecting specific terms, concepts and examples in your answer? That seems entirely fair.


There are cases where 2 terms/ statements are pretty much totally equivalent and even in the textbook ect ect but it's not on the markscheme. This is a issue that arises due to the mass marking required. The person writing the markscheme may not have considered all the possible correct answers but not every marker is an expert so if personal judgement was used, it would be pretty unfair. At uni, often the people that write a particular question mark all the attempts, they know what they are looking for and give credit for correct answers even ones that aren't exactly what they had in mind.
Original post by black1blade
Thing is with stupid things like that, basically nobody gets those marks so it doesn't really matter. Our physics teacher looked at a break down of the AS paper average marks per question part and some of the averages were like 0.1/2 XD.

Yeah it tends not to make too much difference but it was always ****ing annoying nonetheless.
Original post by black1blade
There are cases where 2 terms/ statements are pretty much totally equivalent and even in the textbook ect ect but it's not on the markscheme. This is a issue that arises due to the mass marking required. The person writing the markscheme may not have considered all the possible correct answers but not every marker is an expert so if personal judgement was used, it would be pretty unfair. At uni, often the people that write a particular question mark all the attempts, they know what they are looking for and give credit for correct answers even ones that aren't exactly what they had in mind.


Very true! University seems harder, but at the same time your interpretation is more open
I'd say that a student who is able to make the most out of their schooling years, is the smartest. It doesn't necessarily mean earning all A's..

Latest

Trending

Trending