ive got the same question and i am so confused as well. Of course we have an intro, main body then conclusion but what do we include in those. The question itself is confusing me. I sort of get it but than I dont.
What exactly do we talk about and how do we structure it.
We ve been told to draw our knowlegde on Diceyans doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty, Judicial application of ss.3 and 4 of the HRA 1998. And the case law R v A, Bellinger and A v Secretary for the Home Department etc.
Any help would be appreciated, especially on the structure.