I prefer anonymous threads.
How much you have in savings is a small piece of the picture. Your net worth is far more important, but even that is not quite right.
Net worth = all your assets - all your debts
"Assets" include savings, but also property that you own, collectibles, investments, etc.
"Debts"... everyone knows what debts are.
Some "assets" appreciate in value, others do not, and some depreciate. In some sense, doing "well", involves making sure that the total interest on your assets, is higher than the total interest on your debts. It also involves making sure there is some cash reserve (savings) in case sh*t hits the fan. And making sure that your credit score is reasonably good.
You can have LOTS of debt, in theory. But still if you invest the money that you borrowed smartly, you could be making far greater interest on that, than the interest you are paying on your debt. That will mean you can easily keep up with loan repayments, also improving your credit score. It is unlikely however that any bank or lender will lend you a large sum of money in the first place, unless you demonstrate to them that there is a high probability you will be able to repay the loan (eventually) instead of going bankrupt.
Ergo... you can have 'millionaires' who have a negative net worth, aka more debt than assets, and yet still live lavishly, because they are making a lot more money than they are spending.
You could also have a very high "net worth", where the value of your assets far exceed your debts. But your assets could be depreciating rapidly in value, and your debts could have high interest rates. That is a much worse position to be in, than that described above. Because you are losing money instead. Which is a little ironic. But it's how our economy works.