Join TSR now and get all your revision questions answeredSign up now
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    This exam was kinda difficult, for the 6 mark diagram questio i just basically increased AD at full capacity to increase price levelsbut people are saying you decrease the AS shifting left instead (cause there was negative growth in 08) plus i was talking sh8t for the international trade question
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    4? that seems to much - it was a 6marker surely explanation has more weighting?
    In a 6 marker a graph usually gets 4 marks
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChoccyWoccy)
    What did everyone say for advantages to Estonia of joining the Eurozone?

    For my first I put increased trade and explained that, but didn't include any mention of AS or AD ( ) and for my second I couldn't think of anything else so just put lower prices for Estonian consumers due to transparency, which probably won't get any marks
    im sure transparancy is right? read about it here i think yesterday! (this was for lativa joing euro currency)
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Silverback94)
    How did people answer the international trade 10 marker? I spoke about how it's important and then mentioned other factors and mentioned why they may be important, not sure if that was the right way to go about it now though. Also I completely got the diagram wrong, read figure 3.1 instead for some reason, but do you still get marks for labeling the diagrams like in f582?
    I talked about how openess to international trafde increased exports which led to rise in AD, then i talked about other factors such as increased FDI to facilitate growth which is probably a load of sh8t
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mrsmeagol)
    This exam was kinda difficult, for the 6 mark diagram questio i just basically increased AD at full capacity to increase price levelsbut people are saying you decrease the AS shifting left instead (cause there was negative growth in 08) plus i was talking sh8t for the international trade question
    aha same!
    for int trade all i put was international competitiveness, availability of goods, increased exports = AD increase
    that was pretty much it
    related it abit to FDI which links into in by investing and increasing competitiveness for I Trade
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    im sure transparancy is right? read about it here i think yesterday! (this was for lativa joing euro currency)
    Yeah but I'm not sure if it would count as an advantage for Estonia, I think it's more an advantage for consumers in general.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChoccyWoccy)
    What did everyone say for advantages to Estonia of joining the Eurozone?

    For my first I put increased trade and explained that, but didn't include any mention of AS or AD ( ) and for my second I couldn't think of anything else so just put lower prices for Estonian consumers due to transparency, which probably won't get any marks
    i talked about price transparancy aswell, i'm sure its an advantage of joining the eurozone
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChoccyWoccy)
    Yeah but I'm not sure if it would count as an advantage for Estonia, I think it's more an advantage for consumers in general.
    i said it forces estonian businesses to be more efficcient reducing their costs or increasing quality to increase international price competitiveness of estonia
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    aha same!
    for int trade all i put was international competitiveness, availability of goods, increased exports = AD increase
    that was pretty much it
    related it abit to FDI which links into in by investing and increasing competitiveness for I Trade
    exactly what i did lol
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mrsmeagol)
    i talked about price transparancy aswell, i'm sure its an advantage of joining the eurozone
    For the 2 reasons I put
    1)price stability (no fluctuations and hedging - so mantain currency)
    2) increased trade and international competitiveness

    First bit I think is right but not the second bit? thoughts?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    4? that seems to much - it was a 6marker surely explanation has more weighting?
    No. The mark scheme allocates 4 marks for a correct diagram fully label.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Also might have messed up the 20, only realised about halfway through that is said to what extent will high growth rates in the future alone cause sustainable development.

    So in my 'yes it will' side I wrote about how it would mean the government would have more funds to spend on sustainable policies, which is actually kind of a 'no growth enough is not alone' because it suggests help is needed from the government.


    Hmm.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:


    Pretty sure the diagram question said what could have been a reason for the price level and GDP level. Think it opens it up for a number of different reasons to be analysed. Could shift LRAS in or both LRAS and AD in to show inflation rise and GDP fall. So imagine both are acceptable diagrams
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by mrsmeagol)
    i said it forces estonian businesses to be more efficcient reducing their costs or increasing quality to increase international price competitiveness of estonia
    I kind of messed that up by writing that under my first benefit which was 'increased trade' - wrote loads of random factors for that, not properly analytical - leaving nothing for the second point.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChoccyWoccy)
    Also might have messed up the 20, only realised about halfway through that is said to what extent will high growth rates in the future alone cause sustainable development.

    So in my 'yes it will' side I wrote about how it would mean the government would have more funds to spend on sustainable policies, which is actually kind of a 'no growth enough is not alone' because it suggests help is needed from the government.


    Hmm.
    that would be fine if you had it as evaluative points?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    that would be fine if you had it as evaluative points?
    I had it as an eval point as well but I also had it in my 'yes growth will cause development point' so that's wrong
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Hope this is right.

    I just shifted LRAS in which showed the rise and the GDP fall which was what happenened in 2008.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Also I put price transparency as a benefit of Estonia joining the Eurozone.

    Surely thats acceptable!?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by lucybrown92)
    For the 2 reasons I put
    1)price stability (no fluctuations and hedging - so mantain currency)
    2) increased trade and international competitiveness

    First bit I think is right but not the second bit? thoughts?
    yeah i think they're right, i put increased increased exports to increase AD and price transparancy
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by HJSpence)
    Also I put price transparency as a benefit of Estonia joining the Eurozone.

    Surely thats acceptable!?
    I think any advantage is acceptable! Doesn't have to be relevant I don't think!

    Posted from TSR Mobile
 
 
 
Poll
If you won £30,000, which of these would you spend it on?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.