People who use don't instead of doesn't and who forget to start sentences with words

OP don't have a clue about nothing. Their just jealous of are English GCSEs.

Why do people sometimes use don't instead of doesn't? They're not interchangeable...

Why do people also forget how the difference between there/their and they're? and it's and its and other words that sound the same but are different?

Also why do people forget to put words like I in front of sentences like... Putting "Love it!" instead of I love it...

Its strange. But its there business. Hate it. Love it. Don't make difference to they're lives.

Funny gal

Laziness.

Contempt for the English language should be punishable with 50 years prison sentence》imo

We have obligatory subject pronouns, the -es ending is absolutely vestigial and only still exists where the rest of the verb paradigm is dead because of the heavy use of the third person, particularly in written works.



Well, homophony, but I will admit I have little patience with this one myself. To be fair, the apostrophe is a terrible kludge, and it is just a written convention and has no grammatical reality - particularly the possessive apostrophe.

Also muddying the waters is the fact that only the personal pronouns have overt case features in English. Since they're indicates that auxiliaries are phonetically cliticised in English, it's quite fair that someone might think their is the auxiliary cliticisation, particularly if they analyse the apostrophe, generalising from John's to it's and they're, as part of an overt possessive case paradigm at the grammatical level (which it isn't, it's just a written convention).

Far from an unreasonable assumption, and to understand it fully requires a knowledge of the interplay between phonetics, syntax and formal written language, quite apart from the complexity of the syntactic rules themselves.

Misunderstanding the apostrophe may therefore be due to the use of reading for early formal language learning.



Because the subject pronoun is clear from the discourse context. The fact that the phrase is exclamatory with a highly deictic function means it lends itself to syllable reduction and being analysed as a chunk. The fact that an exclamatory "you/we/they/he love(s) it" would have a mandatory subject pronoun is evidence that in such constructions the first person singular is the unmarked form.

OMG. No full-stop. I will call the cops now.

My head hurts.

My head hurts.

We have obligatory subject pronouns, the -es ending is absolutely vestigial and only still exists where the rest of the verb paradigm is dead because of the heavy use of the third person, particularly in written works.



Well, homophony, but I will admit I have little patience with this one myself. To be fair, the apostrophe is a terrible kludge, and it is just a written convention and has no grammatical reality - particularly the possessive apostrophe.

Also muddying the waters is the fact that only the personal pronouns have overt case features in English. Since they're indicates that auxiliaries are phonetically cliticised in English, it's quite fair that someone might think their is the auxiliary cliticisation, particularly if they analyse the apostrophe, generalising from John's to it's and they're, as part of an overt possessive case paradigm at the grammatical level (which it isn't, it's just a written convention).

Far from an unreasonable assumption, and to understand it fully requires a knowledge of the interplay between phonetics, syntax and formal written language, quite apart from the complexity of the syntactic rules themselves.

Misunderstanding the apostrophe may therefore be due to the use of reading for early formal language learning.



Because the subject pronoun is clear from the discourse context. The fact that the phrase is exclamatory with a highly deictic function means it lends itself to syllable reduction and being analysed as a chunk. The fact that an exclamatory "you/we/they/he love(s) it" would have a mandatory subject pronoun is evidence that in such constructions the first person singular is the unmarked form.

As I've said before don't and doesn't have two different meaning... We learn all of this in school, I don't understand why it's so hard for
people to remember it...


If the apostrophe was hard to use, they would be typing it as "theyre" which I've seen people do... I don't know what's wrong with them. . It's like know and now and no also and every other two or more words that sound the same but have DIFFERENT meanings.

As for the I love it thing, it just annoys me to no end really.

I think people are just getting lazy.