The Student Room Group

UKIP MEP's home is attacked

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Falcatas
The only way you can enforce modern socialism now is with state backed coercion. It is not the same type of socialism that Marx had predicted. Public ownership is no longer the same as ownership of the workers.


Nationalisation is left wing. I agree corporatism is not left wing but it isn't properly economic right wing either. It is a corruption of geninue small state free market "right wing" economics.


What modern economic system isn't backed by state coercion?

The socialism that Marx predicted never happened and state ownership alone is not socialism. Socialism is social ownership, society decides what to produce and produces it for society. Nazism clearly wasn't that.
Original post by the mezzil
Nationalism was even bloody invented by the left! They made the damn ideology up along with patriotism! And now they attack anybody who claims to be either.


:rofl:

Histories a lot more fun when you just make it up, isn't it?

Original post by the mezzil
No it is right wing. But the Nazis were not corporatists.


What were they then? You haven't actually managed to convince yourself they were socialist have you?
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by DaveSmith99
:rofl:

Histories a lot more fun when you just make it up, isn't it?


Well seeing as I got a first when I did my long essay on it, no.

Here is a quick wiki link. I cba getting into the complexities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism

Nationalism was invented by the left during the 19th century revolutions. Ask any early modern European history academic.

As for your edit, the Nazis were a mixed bunch. They had aspects of Keynesian policies, as well as more economically right wing ideas, such as privatisation of the banks. They are a bit like Labour and could not make their mind up. Multiple personality disorder.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by the mezzil
Nationalism was even bloody invented by the left! They made the damn ideology up along with patriotism! And now they attack anybody who claims to be either.


Oh well nationalisation of industry is not the same as nationalism.
Well nationalism and patriotism are probably more socially right wing things and is related to imperialism and colonialism.
It was about promoting a national cultural identity often with religion

This is where the traditionally left got it right. I think you are confusing the modern left with the traditional left.

The modern left don't realise they are promoting their own form of national identity but a multicultural form of it. The real answer is to promote a genuine human identity rather than a "us versus them".

You can see this how Russia is treated as evil for its resilience to cling on to traditional values while we weaponise diversity and shout racist or homophobe at anyone with even a differing opinion.
Original post by Falcatas
Oh well nationalisation of industry is not the same as nationalism.
Well nationalism and patriotism are probably more socially right wing things and is related to imperialism and colonialism.
It was about promoting a national cultural identity often with religion

This is where the traditionally left got it right. I think you are confusing the modern left with the traditional left.

The modern left don't realise they are promoting their own form of national identity but a multicultural form of it. The real answer is to promote a genuine human identity rather than a "us versus them".

You can see this how Russia is treated as evil for its resilience to cling on to traditional values while we weaponise diversity and shout racist or homophobe at anyone with even a differing opinion.


Sorry I misread. I thought you meant nationalism, not nationalisation.

The traditional left invented both patriotism and nationalism. And I agree, what you say is correct. It is strange how history repeat itself, despite people telling themselves "we must not do this or that again".
Original post by DaveSmith99
What modern economic system isn't backed by state coercion?

The socialism that Marx predicted never happened and state ownership alone is not socialism. Socialism is social ownership, society decides what to produce and produces it for society. Nazism clearly wasn't that.



Sadly none currently.
I agree with your definition of socialism but it will never happen like that as traditional socialism is dead.

Society and social bonds have been damaged due to the state.
Original post by the mezzil
Sorry I misread. I thought you meant nationalism, not nationalisation.

The traditional left invented both patriotism and nationalism. And I agree, what you say is correct. It is strange how history repeat itself, despite people telling themselves "we must not do this or that again".


I didn't say that I said it was the actually traditional right, the social conservatives that promoted it.

The traditional left opposed pretty much all identities including a national one.
Original post by the mezzil
Well seeing as I got a first when I did my long essay on it, no.

Here is a quick wiki link. I cba getting into the complexities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalism

Nationalism was invented by the left during the 19th century revolutions. Ask any early modern European history academic.


Nationalism was not 'invented', it developed over a long period of time and it began way before the 19th centuries, modern nationalism began with empire building. Empire building is not left wing.
Reply 68
Disgraceful. I'm all for political protest and certainly don't subscribe to UKIP as a party but this is mindless and frightening.
Original post by DaveSmith99
Nationalism was not 'invented', it developed over a long period of time and it began way before the 19th centuries, modern nationalism began with empire building. Empire building is not left wing.


Invented, developed, whatever definition you wish to use. It came into prominence during the 19th century, and late 18th century. For example, would you say the French revolution was nationalist or not? For it was a revolution primarily focused on liberating the working class from the decadent monarchy and uniting them as one French people. (A quick look at my avatar and you might understand what I mean)

I am not talking about modern nationalism. I am talking about how nationalism came about. It was not developed/ invented by the capitalists, what sense would that make? None.

I am not talking about empire building either.
The most worrying thing is that people actually think it's okay because they don't agree with UKIPs views. Same kind of people who probably believe there should be censorship and restricted freedom of speech.
Original post by the mezzil
Invented, developed, whatever definition you wish to use. It came into prominence during the 19th century, and late 18th century. For example, would you say the French revolution was nationalist or not? For it was a revolution primarily focused on liberating the working class from the decadent monarchy and uniting them as one French people. (A quick look at my avatar and you might understand what I mean)

I am not talking about modern nationalism. I am talking about how nationalism came about. It was not developed/ invented by the capitalists, what sense would that make? None.

I am not talking about empire building either.


Sure it was. This is not where it began though.

If you're not talking about modern nationalism then why are we beginning in the late 18th century?
These left loons are the most violent of them all. They do not support democracy and believe that only their ideology is right. Seriously how anyone can support liberal facists like labour I do not know
Original post by SHallowvale
Questions:

- Are there any other sites which are able to confirm this (I can't find any)? Should we trust a blog?

- Was this attack targetted at UKIP directly or was someone trying to break in?

- How do you know the attacker was a member of ''the left''?

If this attack was genuine then of course it should be condemned. Only morons would endorse such an action.


New evidence published on the guardian, BBC and dailymail shows they are supporters of the Labour Party who disagree with UKIPs policies.

The fact is they are liberal fascists who will attack anyone who is against their ideology. Seriously labour know nothing of democracy. They won't publicly debate UKIP, will not support a referendum, repeatedly attack members of other parties, start discriminative campaigns on people by promoting violence and attacks.
Original post by MASTER265
New evidence published on the guardian, BBC and dailymail shows they are supporters of the Labour Party who disagree with UKIPs policies.

The fact is they are liberal fascists who will attack anyone who is against their ideology. Seriously labour know nothing of democracy. They won't publicly debate UKIP, will not support a referendum, repeatedly attack members of other parties, start discriminative campaigns on people by promoting violence and attacks.


So when Farage has to kick out half of his council and MEP candidates, it's got nothing at all do with UKIP, but when a 'labour supporter' does something the entire party and leadership are all personally responsible?

UKIP sheep are hilarious :lol:
Original post by the mezzil
Nationalism was even bloody invented by the left! They made the damn ideology up along with patriotism! And now they attack anybody who claims to be either.


No it wasn't.
Original post by Green Marble
Typical violent leftists


Typical blanket labeling that means nothing.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by DaveSmith99
So when Farage has to kick out half of his council and MEP candidates, it's got nothing at all do with UKIP, but when a 'labour supporter' does something the entire party and leadership are all personally responsible?

UKIP sheep are hilarious :lol:


Less than 0.6% of UKIP members have been found guilty of allegations and kicked out as a result. Get your facts right you stupid far left loon. Typical labour says everyone in UKIP is racist, everyone in UKIP want to discriminate against women. Seriously I bet you can't name 20 people who are guilty of this. It's just a few twitter posters and members on the media who you have seen. But being a typical labour supported you blame every one of us. This is why I will never vote labour because as I support I am suddenly a racist homophobic nazi. You and your party are a complete joke.
Original post by MASTER265
Less than 0.6% of UKIP members have been found guilty of allegations and kicked out as a result. Get your facts right you stupid far left loon. Typical labour says everyone in UKIP is racist, everyone in UKIP want to discriminate against women. Seriously I bet you can't name 20 people who are guilty of this. It's just a few twitter posters and members on the media who you have seen. But being a typical labour supported you blame every one of us. This is why I will never vote labour because as I support I am suddenly a racist homophobic nazi. You and your party are a complete joke.


Oh my Christ :lol:

I brought up Farage kicking out people UKIP tend to get very annoyed when you suggest that because some people say and do some things the entire party does, and that's exactly what you were doing with Labour and one 'labour supporter' who threw a brick.

If you want to play the percentage game, 0.6% is far higher than the 0.000005% you are using to generalise.
Original post by DaveSmith99
Oh my Christ :lol:

I brought up Farage kicking out people UKIP tend to get very annoyed when you suggest that because some people say and do some things the entire party does, and that's exactly what you were doing with Labour and one 'labour supporter' who threw a brick.

If you want to play the percentage game, 0.6% is far higher than the 0.000005% you are using to generalise.


Tie in the expenses scandal, the racist attacks, the sex abuse crimes, the violent attacks and the many illegal fraud activities, most sources estimate 1.3% of labour so do your research you far left loon. You seem to have the IQ range of a crumpet and the Charisma of a rock

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending