Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    This is for those of faith who want to ask atheists on TSR anything about Atheism, why they don't believe etc. You can ask anything you want, just be polite
    POLITE debate is encouraged.

    Thanks
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I find people who bang on about atheism, past the age of 16, quite perplexing. What do you say to this?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by like_marmite)
    I find people who bang on about atheism, past the age of 16, quite perplexing. What do you say to this?
    If your argument here is to imply that those who debate or discuss Atheism are immature, then Richard Dawkins and the like must be rather nonsensical in their views. :facepalm:
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I'm an atheist

    Will we one day live in a secular world do you think?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by leavingthecity)
    I'm an atheist

    Will we one day live in a secular world do you think?
    I hope so. However, as long as we have religious texts we will have disillusionment.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    I hope so. However, as long as we have religious texts we will have disillusionment.
    And I think we will always manufacture religious texts.

    Hmmmm, I was hoping that this thread would attract more questions....
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by leavingthecity)
    And I think we will always manufacture religious texts.

    Hmmmm, I was hoping that this thread would attract more questions....
    So did I, I think it hasn't had enough bumps to get attention yet
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    If your argument here is to imply that those who debate or discuss Atheism are immature, then Richard Dawkins and the like must be rather nonsensical in their views. :facepalm:
    Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tank Girl)
    Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins?
    Not a fan per se, I think his ideas and argument points are very good, however I disagree with a few of his views.
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    Not a fan per se, I think his ideas and argument points are very good, however I disagree with a few of his views.
    I agree with you! I like Dawkins in principle but he can be too belligerent in his argument against religion, would you agree?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    If your argument here is to imply that those who debate or discuss Atheism are immature, then Richard Dawkins and the like must be rather nonsensical in their views.
    I am not saying Dawkins has nonsensical views. His banging on about them might be nonsensical, however.

    The difference between you and Dawkins is that he responds to well-drafted arguments from the likes of William Lane Craig and John Lennox. You firstly are starting the conversation (not merely responding), and secondly when you do respond you do so to asinine arguments posted by 15-year-olds who have not read a book. Academic argument is somewhat different to posting half-assed stuff on student sites.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Tank Girl)
    I agree with you! I like Dawkins in principle but he can be too belligerent in his argument against religion, would you agree?
    I would agree! He seems to be somewhat narrow minded, but I similarly think that he engages in those with the same sort of hostility. It can be rather hard not to retaliate on his part.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by like_marmite)
    I am not saying Dawkins has nonsensical views. His banging on about them might be nonsensical, however.

    The difference between you and Dawkins is that he responds to well-drafted arguments from the likes of William Lane Craig and John Lennox. You firstly are starting the conversation (not merely responding), and secondly when you do respond you do so to asinine arguments posted by 15-year-olds who have not read a book. Academic argument is somewhat different to posting half-assed stuff on student sites.
    Firstly, lets discuss the usage of the word YOU. 'You' would imply me personally, I generally ignore poorly constructed arguments or questions that do not lead to a further discussion on such matter.

    And I like the way you try to appear intelligent but failed to realise that you made a fundamental error when you put 'is somewhat' rather than 'are somewhat'.

    If you have nothing else to contribute then this conversation is over.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by like_marmite)
    I am not saying Dawkins has nonsensical views. His banging on about them might be nonsensical, however.

    The difference between you and Dawkins is that he responds to well-drafted arguments from the likes of William Lane Craig and John Lennox. You firstly are starting the conversation (not merely responding), and secondly when you do respond you do so to asinine arguments posted by 15-year-olds who have not read a book. Academic argument is somewhat different to posting half-assed stuff on student sites.
    There's nothing wrong with banging on about something if you have an aim in mind, for example, I talk about it often because I believe that religion offers women a very bad deal. In fact, discussing this with young people, people in education who are still forming their opinions, is critical. To prompt a young girl to question why when she gets married her husband has to be the head of her household, is a worthwhile thing.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by leavingthecity)
    There's nothing wrong with banging on about something if you have an aim in mind, for example, I talk about it often because I believe that religion offers women a very bad deal. In fact, discussing this with young people, people in education who are still forming their opinions, is critical. To prompt a young girl to question why when she gets married her husband has to be the head of her household, is a worthwhile thing.
    Don't you think people can make these decisions for themselves?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by morgan8002)
    Don't you think people can make these decisions for themselves?
    This is completely irrelevant, please contribute to the THREAD or leave
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    This is completely irrelevant, please contribute to the THREAD or leave
    I thought we could ask anything, sorry.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by morgan8002)
    I thought we could ask anything, sorry.
    The general implication was to ask about Atheism...
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by morgan8002)
    I thought we could ask anything, sorry.
    You could rephrase maybe. Asking why some atheists are so 'belligerent' such as Dawkins, and why they think it's necessary...
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheOpinion)
    Firstly, lets discuss the usage of the word YOU. 'You' would imply me personally, I generally ignore poorly constructed arguments or questions that do not lead to a further discussion on such matter.

    And I like the way you try to appear intelligent but failed to realise that you made a fundamental error when you put 'is somewhat' rather than 'are somewhat'.

    If you have nothing else to contribute then this conversation is over.
    Academic argument is plural, according to you? :lol: Let's not try to get into a who is the smartest prince of them all because you won't win. And you need to grow up a bit if you're so threatened when someone challenges that you have to try to correct grammar where their grammar is actually correct. Again this lack of sophistication in argument, by the people who want to engage the topic of religion, is why no adult should ever engage the topic of religion.

    (Original post by leavingthecity)
    There's nothing wrong with banging on about something if you have an aim in mind, for example, I talk about it often because I believe that religion offers women a very bad deal. In fact, discussing this with young people, people in education who are still forming their opinions, is critical. To prompt a young girl to question why when she gets married her husband has to be the head of her household, is a worthwhile thing.
    That is a reasonable approach, certainly, but only if you have access to the people you want to affect. If you're talking in mid-air, to anyone who'll listen, with unsophisticated argument whilst possessing the sole intention of giving people the impression you're some philosophy professor when you're really someone whose only interaction with philosophy is a B in GCSE RE, then I doubt informing people about their options is your sole intention.
    Spoiler:
    Show
    By you I mean people generally. I am not saying you personally are guilty of this.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: March 15, 2016
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
    Useful resources

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.