Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    http://files.physicsandmathstutor.co...%20Edexcel.pdf

    I don't quite understand how to do part c, can someone explain what's going on?
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by pouii)
    http://files.physicsandmathstutor.co...%20Edexcel.pdf

    I don't quite understand how to do part c, can someone explain what's going on?
    What question?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    What question?
    oops question 2
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by pouii)
    oops question 2
    Find the area of the initial rectangle, then find what the multiplier is between the initial area and the area after it is transformed.

    det(A) should be equal to this because the determinant tells you the area multiplier for a particular matrix (not particularly happy with my explanation but I can't think of it differently to explain. I'm sure you know what I mean.)
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    The determinant shows the scale factor for enlargement so find the original area of the rectangle the det is a+4 . Area of shape orgianly is 2 . So 9 is how much been enlarged so 9=a+4 so a=5. Hope that's ok!?
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by Sb22312)
    The determinant shows the scale factor for enlargement so find the original area of the rectangle the det is a+4 . Area of shape orgianly is 2 . So 9 is how much been enlarged so 9=a+4 so a=5. Hope that's ok!?
    Let's not post full solutions.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Find the area of the initial rectangle, then find what the multiplier is between the initial area and the area after it is transformed.

    det(A) should be equal to this because the determinant tells you the area multiplier for a particular matrix (not particularly happy with my explanation but I can't think of it differently to explain. I'm sure you know what I mean.)
    Well obviously the area of the rectangle is 2 and 18/2 is 9
    but here in bold is what i don't understand what you've done

    (Original post by Sb22312)
    The determinant shows the scale factor for enlargement so find the original area of the rectangle the det is a+4 . Area of shape orgianly is 2 . So 9 is how much been enlarged so 9=a+4 so a=5. Hope that's ok!?
    so good that i've understood everything you've done there
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by pouii)
    Well obviously the area of the rectangle is 2 and 18/2 is 9
    but here in bold is what i don't understand what you've done



    so good that i've understood everything you've done there
    Well it should've made sense if you understand what the determinant actually means. Consider what the determinant tells you about the area within a 2x2 matrix and then it'll make sense. I meant the area scale factor when I said multiplier.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Well it should've made sense if you understand what the determinant actually means. Consider what the determinant tells you about the area within a 2x2 matrix and then it'll make sense. I meant the area scale factor when I said multiplier.
    Well the determinant can tell me whether a matrix is singular or not. If the matrix has a determinant=0 then that matrix is singular and has no inverse.

    but how does this help me?
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Welcome Squad
    (Original post by pouii)
    Well the determinant can tell me whether a matrix is singular or not. If the matrix has a determinant=0 then that matrix is singular and has no inverse.

    but how does this help me?
    That's not the only thing determinants tell you. If it's 0 then the matrix is singular hence no inverse; yes that is true. In addition, if the matrix does not equal 0, then the number we get is the area scale factor (only for 2x2, it would be volume scale factor for 3x3) of any 2D object you apply that matrix to. So the area of the original object multiplied by the determinant will give you the area of it after it has been transformed by that particular matrix. So really, all you would've done for that part is say 2(a+4)=18 and then solve for a.

    Also, if the determinant is negative, then we are told that the matrix involves a reflection of the object at some point.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    That's not the only thing determinants tell you. If it's 0 then the matrix is singular hence no inverse; yes that is true. In addition, if the matrix does not equal 0, then the number we get is the area scale factor (only for 2x2, it would be volume scale factor for 3x3) of any 2D object you apply that matrix to. So the area of the original object multiplied by the determinant will give you the area of it after it has been transformed by that particular matrix. So really, all you would've done for that part is say 2(a+4)=18 and then solve for a.

    Also, if the determinant is negative, then we are told that the matrix involves a reflection of the object at some point.
    OH! I see
    so area(1) x det = area(2)

    but what if it gives me a negative det and area of original shape and asks me to get area of transformed shape?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by pouii)
    OH! I see
    so area(1) x det = area(2)

    but what if it gives me a negative det and area of original shape and asks me to get area of transformed shape?
    Take the magnitude, the negative sign indicates that there has been a reflection of the shape under the transformation matrix.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by B_9710)
    Take the magnitude, the negative sign indicates that there has been a reflection of the shape under the transformation matrix.
    oh ok thanks
 
 
 
Poll
Do you agree with the PM's proposal to cut tuition fees for some courses?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.