The Student Room Group

President Snowflake to launch investigation into "voter fraud".

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Ladbants
Funny how liberals are trying to pull the "calling a spade a spade" and "snowflake" cards. What's next, trump's an sjw, he needs a safe space, he's a cuck?


The word "cuck" makes you look unintelligent so no, I wouldn't use it. But he did call for a safe space after Mike Pence was booed during a Hamilton viewing. He and his "alt-right" cronies are a lot more thin-skinned than the liberals who they criticise.

How many other presidents spent time whining about the people who don't like them, like he does on Twitter? They just got on with their jobs.
Original post by WBZ144
He won the election, but is still too insecure to get over the fact that he lost the popular vote. President Snowflake claims that the reason for this is that "millions of illegal immigrants" voted for Clinton, a claim that is completely unsupported by evidence. Rather, it's an "alternative fact" because it was invented to make him feel all fuzzy and warm again.

He will now waste a lot of money and resources to find a way to soothe his delicate ego. The White House is now one massive safe space.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38746559


Are you actually stupid? Watch the press conference two days ago in full and you would know that the left-wing mainstream media were the ones calling on him to investiage voter fraud. Every other question was "Why isn't Trump investigating it if he thinks it's rigged?". To paraphrase a question : " This is one of the biggest issues in electoral history. Why is he not...?" And then he does exactly that and gets called a snowflake and too woried about his own ego. Too bad this investigation will turn Cali Red and give him the popular vote as well.

Congratulations liberals, you played yourself.
Listen to the words of Big Joe: https://youtu.be/Ap2PWCzIrrE

Use your head!

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by BobBobson
Are you actually stupid? Watch the press conference two days ago in full and you would know that the left-wing mainstream media were the ones calling on him to investiage voter fraud. Every other question was "Why isn't Trump investigating it if he thinks it's rigged?". To paraphrase a question : " This is one of the biggest issues in electoral history. Why is he not...?" And then he does exactly that and gets called a snowflake and too woried about his own ego. Too bad this investigation will turn Cali Red and give him the popular vote as well.

Congratulations liberals, you played yourself.
Listen to the words of Big Joe: https://youtu.be/Ap2PWCzIrrE

Use your head!

Posted from TSR Mobile


The stupid ones are the ones who think that it is wise to waste money on investigating a claim that is supported by no evidence whatsoever. I don't care if certain liberals taunted him to investigate it, he would ignore them if his ego was less fragile. Who in their right mind listens to the suggestions of people who cannot stand them? Are you seriously trying to suggest that he is doing this in order to appease liberals?

Those liberals want him to look bad, and now they're getting what they wanted.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by WBZ144
The stupid ones are the ones who think that it is wise to waste money on investigating a claim that is supported by no evidence whatsoever. I don't care if certain liberals taunted him to investigate it, he would ignore them if his ego was less fragile. Who in their right mind listens to the suggestions of people who cannot stand them? Are you seriously trying to suggest that he is doing this in order to appease liberals?

Those liberals want him to look bad, and now they're getting what they wanted.


Evidence:
https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


It's absolutely false that there is no evidence. There are still many reports on there being dead people not only registered to vote but voting in state elections. No voter ids.

He isn't doing this to appease liberals, he always wanted to do it. But knew it wasn't in the public interest. Then he gets called out for not doing it, so he does it.

A real president stands up for everyone. Even the people who can't stand him. If the people wanted an investigation, he gave them an investigation.

So if he ignored it, he would be reckless and irresponsible, but if he investigated it, he has a fragile ego.

We all know what happened here. The liberals tried to create another (fake) negative news cycle about Trump and he called their bluff.

Liberals got played plain and simple. Now the useful idiots are spreading stupid **** like he's wasting money on an investigation. Even though it will cost relatively nothing and will actually help unity by if the liberal narrative is true, proving that the elections weren't tampered with.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by BobBobson
Evidence:
https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


It's absolutely false that there is no evidence. There are still many reports on there being dead people not only registered to vote but voting in state elections. No voter ids.

He isn't doing this to appease liberals, he always wanted to do it. But knew it wasn't in the public interest. Then he gets called out for not doing it, so he does it.

A real president stands up for everyone. Even the people who can't stand him. If the people wanted an investigation, he gave them an investigation.

So if he ignored it, he would be reckless and irresponsible, but if he investigated it, he has a fragile ego.

We all know what happened here. The liberals tried to create another (fake) negative news cycle about Trump and he called their bluff.

Liberals got played plain and simple. Now the useful idiots are spreading stupid **** like he's wasting money on an investigation. Even though it will cost relatively nothing and will actually help unity by if the liberal narrative is true, proving that the elections weren't tampered with.

Posted from TSR Mobile


So your "evidence" is a YouTube video, an opinion. Now I know where this "alternative facts" phenomenon is coming from. Produce evidence from a reputable source, rather than relying on a YouTuber to voice your opinions for you, it's very sloppy.

He always wanted to do it, because winning wasn't enough for this insecure man-child. He couldn't accept the fact that more people did not vote for him, even though legislators on both sides of the political spectrum (you know, actual experts) have agreed that there was no voter fraud. The liberals taunted him to investigate it, because they wanted to have a field day mocking him for it, and they knew that he can always be relied on to take bait.

If he ignored those taunts, it would be a sign of maturity and leadership. But he cannot be expected to act mature and like a leader, it seems. If you think that it costs "relatively nothing", you are clueless.

People registered in two states include Steve Bannon and Tiffany Trump. Here is also an example of a Trump supporter charged with voting twice:
https://www.indy100.com/article/trump-supporter-charged-voting-twice-lawyer-shouldn-t-stand-trial-7549146
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by WBZ144
So your "evidence" is a YouTube video, an opinion. Now I know where this "alternative facts" phenomenon is coming from. Produce evidence from a reputable source, rather than relying on a YouTuber to voice your opinions for you, it's very sloppy.

He always wanted to do it, because winning wasn't enough for this insecure man-child. He couldn't accept the fact that more people did not vote for him, even though legislators on both sides of the political spectrum (you know, actual experts) have agreed that there was no voter fraud. The liberals taunted him to investigate it, because they wanted to have a field day mocking him for it, and they knew that he can always be relied on to take bait.

If he ignored those taunts, it would be a sign of maturity and leadership. But he cannot be expected to act mature and like a leader, it seems. If you think that it costs "relatively nothing", you are clueless.

People registered in two states include Steve Bannon and Tiffany Trump. Here is also an example of a Trump supporter charged with voting twice:
https://www.indy100.com/article/trump-supporter-charged-voting-twice-lawyer-shouldn-t-stand-trial-7549146


Err no, honey. Watch the video. He's an undercover investigator. Stopped reading your comment after that.


What was your reaction when the democrats initially declared there was election fraud?
Original post by BobBobson
Err no, honey. Watch the video. He's an undercover investigator. Stopped reading your comment after that.


Can this "investigation" be verified with stats which show that millions of illegal immigrants came out to vote for Clinton? Or is it a bunch of heavily edited clips using a few isolated incidents in order to claim that there are millions like it?
Original post by StrawbAri
What was your reaction when the democrats initially declared there was election fraud?


I agree there is election fraud, against republicans, as always. Democrats have been abusing election fraud for decades. Why are they the only ones to be against voter id, even though the majority of the country is for it.

Original post by WBZ144
Can this "investigation" be verified with stats which show that millions of illegal immigrants came out to vote for Clinton? Or is it a bunch of heavily edited clips using a few isolated incidents in order to claim that there are millions like it?


"this is a leader of a major SPAC saying that he wants to bus people in across state borders. BUS. As in, not isolated incidents, but multiple busses. It doesn't have to be millions like it. That is enough to trigger someone to investigate this. What statistics would there be that millions of illegal immigrants voted for clinton. Illegals don't walk around holding a sign saying I'm an illegal. What level of stupid are you? However, when we investigate this, we will have these statistics and settle this.

Although, according to estimates, some say that there were even up to 800,000 illegeal immigrants who voted for Clinton: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/

Note: Washington Times, Mainstream newspaper, not "alternative facts"

Surely that is enough to trigger an investigation?
It is quite strange really, the Dems are adamant that voter fraud in the presidential election was none existent, yet they and their proxies in the MSM appear desperate to prevent an investigation into the fraud they are so sure never happened.

Why not let Trump get on with it ?

Unless.................
Original post by BobBobson
"this is a leader of a major SPAC saying that he wants to bus people in across state borders. BUS. As in, not isolated incidents, but multiple busses. It doesn't have to be millions like it. That is enough to trigger someone to investigate this. What statistics would there be that millions of illegal immigrants voted for clinton. Illegals don't walk around holding a sign saying I'm an illegal. What level of stupid are you? However, when we investigate this, we will have these statistics and settle this.

Although, according to estimates, some say that there were even up to 800,000 illegeal immigrants who voted for Clinton: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/

Note: Washington Times, Mainstream newspaper, not "alternative facts"

Surely that is enough to trigger an investigation?


Gerrymandering has primarily been a Republican practice, recently.

Even if that study is true, and the multiple studies debunking voter fraud are false, that generous study still leaves Clinton ahead by another 2 million votes when it comes to the popular vote. So, how feasible is it that 5 million illegal immigrants voted for her?
Original post by joe cooley
It is quite strange really, the Dems are adamant that voter fraud in the presidential election was none existent, yet they and their proxies in the MSM appear desperate to prevent an investigation into the fraud they are so sure never happened.

Why not let Trump get on with it ?

Unless.................


No one is stopping him. However, we have every right to mock and call out his insecurities for it.
Original post by WBZ144
Gerrymandering has primarily been a Republican practice, recently.

Even if that study is true, and the multiple studies debunking voter fraud are false, that generous study still leaves Clinton ahead by another 2 million votes when it comes to the popular vote. So, how feasible is it that 5 million illegal immigrants voted for her?


Moving the goalposts fallacy. I never mentioned the popular vote. I'm saying that's enough to trigger an investigation.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending