Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

President Snowflake to launch investigation into "voter fraud". Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Good bloke)
    Nobody who is sensible and sane cares about the popular vote: it is irrelevant. The system is designed to allow the states to elect the president, not the people.

    He is right to investigate as it appears as if a foreign state has interfered in the election. That is verging on being an act of war.
    He obviously cares.

    That's right: Russia did, and it's a country that favours him. He is trying to prove that voter fraud made him lose the popular vote, which is far-fetched to say the least.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ladbants)
    He just wants an investigation. Nothing wring with that. And it's a bit rich for a liberal to be calling him a snowflake...
    His actions are those of a snowflake, it's calling a spade a spade.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    His actions are those of a snowflake, it's calling a spade a spade.
    Funny how liberals are trying to pull the "calling a spade a spade" and "snowflake" cards. What's next, trump's an sjw, he needs a safe space, he's a cuck?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ladbants)
    Funny how liberals are trying to pull the "calling a spade a spade" and "snowflake" cards. What's next, trump's an sjw, he needs a safe space, he's a cuck?
    The word "cuck" makes you look unintelligent so no, I wouldn't use it. But he did call for a safe space after Mike Pence was booed during a Hamilton viewing. He and his "alt-right" cronies are a lot more thin-skinned than the liberals who they criticise.

    How many other presidents spent time whining about the people who don't like them, like he does on Twitter? They just got on with their jobs.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    He won the election, but is still too insecure to get over the fact that he lost the popular vote. President Snowflake claims that the reason for this is that "millions of illegal immigrants" voted for Clinton, a claim that is completely unsupported by evidence. Rather, it's an "alternative fact" because it was invented to make him feel all fuzzy and warm again.

    He will now waste a lot of money and resources to find a way to soothe his delicate ego. The White House is now one massive safe space.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38746559
    Are you actually stupid? Watch the press conference two days ago in full and you would know that the left-wing mainstream media were the ones calling on him to investiage voter fraud. Every other question was "Why isn't Trump investigating it if he thinks it's rigged?". To paraphrase a question : " This is one of the biggest issues in electoral history. Why is he not...?" And then he does exactly that and gets called a snowflake and too woried about his own ego. Too bad this investigation will turn Cali Red and give him the popular vote as well.

    Congratulations liberals, you played yourself.
    Listen to the words of Big Joe: https://youtu.be/Ap2PWCzIrrE

    Use your head!

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BobBobson)
    Are you actually stupid? Watch the press conference two days ago in full and you would know that the left-wing mainstream media were the ones calling on him to investiage voter fraud. Every other question was "Why isn't Trump investigating it if he thinks it's rigged?". To paraphrase a question : " This is one of the biggest issues in electoral history. Why is he not...?" And then he does exactly that and gets called a snowflake and too woried about his own ego. Too bad this investigation will turn Cali Red and give him the popular vote as well.

    Congratulations liberals, you played yourself.
    Listen to the words of Big Joe: https://youtu.be/Ap2PWCzIrrE

    Use your head!

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    The stupid ones are the ones who think that it is wise to waste money on investigating a claim that is supported by no evidence whatsoever. I don't care if certain liberals taunted him to investigate it, he would ignore them if his ego was less fragile. Who in their right mind listens to the suggestions of people who cannot stand them? Are you seriously trying to suggest that he is doing this in order to appease liberals?

    Those liberals want him to look bad, and now they're getting what they wanted.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    The stupid ones are the ones who think that it is wise to waste money on investigating a claim that is supported by no evidence whatsoever. I don't care if certain liberals taunted him to investigate it, he would ignore them if his ego was less fragile. Who in their right mind listens to the suggestions of people who cannot stand them? Are you seriously trying to suggest that he is doing this in order to appease liberals?

    Those liberals want him to look bad, and now they're getting what they wanted.
    Evidence:
    https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


    It's absolutely false that there is no evidence. There are still many reports on there being dead people not only registered to vote but voting in state elections. No voter ids.

    He isn't doing this to appease liberals, he always wanted to do it. But knew it wasn't in the public interest. Then he gets called out for not doing it, so he does it.

    A real president stands up for everyone. Even the people who can't stand him. If the people wanted an investigation, he gave them an investigation.

    So if he ignored it, he would be reckless and irresponsible, but if he investigated it, he has a fragile ego.

    We all know what happened here. The liberals tried to create another (fake) negative news cycle about Trump and he called their bluff.

    Liberals got played plain and simple. Now the useful idiots are spreading stupid **** like he's wasting money on an investigation. Even though it will cost relatively nothing and will actually help unity by if the liberal narrative is true, proving that the elections weren't tampered with.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BobBobson)
    Evidence:
    https://youtu.be/hDc8PVCvfKs


    It's absolutely false that there is no evidence. There are still many reports on there being dead people not only registered to vote but voting in state elections. No voter ids.

    He isn't doing this to appease liberals, he always wanted to do it. But knew it wasn't in the public interest. Then he gets called out for not doing it, so he does it.

    A real president stands up for everyone. Even the people who can't stand him. If the people wanted an investigation, he gave them an investigation.

    So if he ignored it, he would be reckless and irresponsible, but if he investigated it, he has a fragile ego.

    We all know what happened here. The liberals tried to create another (fake) negative news cycle about Trump and he called their bluff.

    Liberals got played plain and simple. Now the useful idiots are spreading stupid **** like he's wasting money on an investigation. Even though it will cost relatively nothing and will actually help unity by if the liberal narrative is true, proving that the elections weren't tampered with.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    So your "evidence" is a YouTube video, an opinion. Now I know where this "alternative facts" phenomenon is coming from. Produce evidence from a reputable source, rather than relying on a YouTuber to voice your opinions for you, it's very sloppy.

    He always wanted to do it, because winning wasn't enough for this insecure man-child. He couldn't accept the fact that more people did not vote for him, even though legislators on both sides of the political spectrum (you know, actual experts) have agreed that there was no voter fraud. The liberals taunted him to investigate it, because they wanted to have a field day mocking him for it, and they knew that he can always be relied on to take bait.

    If he ignored those taunts, it would be a sign of maturity and leadership. But he cannot be expected to act mature and like a leader, it seems. If you think that it costs "relatively nothing", you are clueless.

    People registered in two states include Steve Bannon and Tiffany Trump. Here is also an example of a Trump supporter charged with voting twice:
    https://www.indy100.com/article/trum...-trial-7549146
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WBZ144)
    So your "evidence" is a YouTube video, an opinion. Now I know where this "alternative facts" phenomenon is coming from. Produce evidence from a reputable source, rather than relying on a YouTuber to voice your opinions for you, it's very sloppy.

    He always wanted to do it, because winning wasn't enough for this insecure man-child. He couldn't accept the fact that more people did not vote for him, even though legislators on both sides of the political spectrum (you know, actual experts) have agreed that there was no voter fraud. The liberals taunted him to investigate it, because they wanted to have a field day mocking him for it, and they knew that he can always be relied on to take bait.

    If he ignored those taunts, it would be a sign of maturity and leadership. But he cannot be expected to act mature and like a leader, it seems. If you think that it costs "relatively nothing", you are clueless.

    People registered in two states include Steve Bannon and Tiffany Trump. Here is also an example of a Trump supporter charged with voting twice:
    https://www.indy100.com/article/trum...-trial-7549146
    Err no, honey. Watch the video. He's an undercover investigator. Stopped reading your comment after that.
    • Offline

      17
      What was your reaction when the democrats initially declared there was election fraud?
      • Thread Starter
      Offline

      19
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by BobBobson)
      Err no, honey. Watch the video. He's an undercover investigator. Stopped reading your comment after that.
      Can this "investigation" be verified with stats which show that millions of illegal immigrants came out to vote for Clinton? Or is it a bunch of heavily edited clips using a few isolated incidents in order to claim that there are millions like it?
      Offline

      3
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by StrawbAri)
      What was your reaction when the democrats initially declared there was election fraud?
      I agree there is election fraud, against republicans, as always. Democrats have been abusing election fraud for decades. Why are they the only ones to be against voter id, even though the majority of the country is for it.

      (Original post by WBZ144)
      Can this "investigation" be verified with stats which show that millions of illegal immigrants came out to vote for Clinton? Or is it a bunch of heavily edited clips using a few isolated incidents in order to claim that there are millions like it?
      "this is a leader of a major SPAC saying that he wants to bus people in across state borders. BUS. As in, not isolated incidents, but multiple busses. It doesn't have to be millions like it. That is enough to trigger someone to investigate this. What statistics would there be that millions of illegal immigrants voted for clinton. Illegals don't walk around holding a sign saying I'm an illegal. What level of stupid are you? However, when we investigate this, we will have these statistics and settle this.

      Although, according to estimates, some say that there were even up to 800,000 illegeal immigrants who voted for Clinton: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...-from-nonciti/

      Note: Washington Times, Mainstream newspaper, not "alternative facts"

      Surely that is enough to trigger an investigation?
      Offline

      1
      ReputationRep:
      It is quite strange really, the Dems are adamant that voter fraud in the presidential election was none existent, yet they and their proxies in the MSM appear desperate to prevent an investigation into the fraud they are so sure never happened.

      Why not let Trump get on with it ?

      Unless.................
      • Thread Starter
      Offline

      19
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by BobBobson)
      "this is a leader of a major SPAC saying that he wants to bus people in across state borders. BUS. As in, not isolated incidents, but multiple busses. It doesn't have to be millions like it. That is enough to trigger someone to investigate this. What statistics would there be that millions of illegal immigrants voted for clinton. Illegals don't walk around holding a sign saying I'm an illegal. What level of stupid are you? However, when we investigate this, we will have these statistics and settle this.

      Although, according to estimates, some say that there were even up to 800,000 illegeal immigrants who voted for Clinton: http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...-from-nonciti/

      Note: Washington Times, Mainstream newspaper, not "alternative facts"

      Surely that is enough to trigger an investigation?
      Gerrymandering has primarily been a Republican practice, recently.

      Even if that study is true, and the multiple studies debunking voter fraud are false, that generous study still leaves Clinton ahead by another 2 million votes when it comes to the popular vote. So, how feasible is it that 5 million illegal immigrants voted for her?
      • Thread Starter
      Offline

      19
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by joe cooley)
      It is quite strange really, the Dems are adamant that voter fraud in the presidential election was none existent, yet they and their proxies in the MSM appear desperate to prevent an investigation into the fraud they are so sure never happened.

      Why not let Trump get on with it ?

      Unless.................
      No one is stopping him. However, we have every right to mock and call out his insecurities for it.
      Offline

      1
      ReputationRep:
      What a lad he is...

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/38764979
      Offline

      3
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by WBZ144)
      Gerrymandering has primarily been a Republican practice, recently.

      Even if that study is true, and the multiple studies debunking voter fraud are false, that generous study still leaves Clinton ahead by another 2 million votes when it comes to the popular vote. So, how feasible is it that 5 million illegal immigrants voted for her?
      Moving the goalposts fallacy. I never mentioned the popular vote. I'm saying that's enough to trigger an investigation.

      Posted from TSR Mobile
     
     
     
    Reply
    Submit reply
    TSR Support Team

    We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

    Updated: January 27, 2017
  1. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  2. Poll
    Will you be richer or poorer than your parents?
    Useful resources
  3. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  4. The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.