The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

.A.
lets get this right before I leave.

A to B it takes 1.5 sec. So A to 0 it takes 0.75 sec. The question said that the ball is directed towards A initally. So it takes 0.75 s to go to A from 0. Then another 0.75 to come back to 0. So far 1.5 s.

The question asked for t=2s. So we are left with 0.5s now.

Its at centre position.

X = asinwt. a=amplitude (0.12) w=2pi/3 t=0.5. This will give you distance away from O in 0.5s. OB=0.12

P = particle position.

PB = OB - PO

= 0.016

.A.


Man
actually
if it STARTS at A then ur right...and if its starts at B then am right...
we both got the right answers just from different places...
see total distance = 0.24
0.24 - 0.016 = 0.224 which is what I get...
it never stated that the particle starts at A :s-smilie:
so for sum reason I assumed it started at B
.A.
lets get this right before I leave.

A to B it takes 1.5 sec. So A to 0 it takes 0.75 sec. The question said that the ball is directed towards A initally. So it takes 0.75 s to go to A from 0. Then another 0.75 to come back to 0. So far 1.5 s.

The question asked for t=2s. So we are left with 0.5s now.

Its at centre position.

X = asinwt. a=amplitude (0.12) w=2pi/3 t=0.5. This will give you distance away from O in 0.5s. OB=0.12

P = particle position.

PB = OB - PO

= 0.016

.A.

ur right...i didnt read that part where it says at t=0 its goin towards A..
**** thats more marks gone
Reply 142
IChem
Well, that's what I got, so and therefore, it's probably wrong:p:

I am 99% sure it's correct :wink: :smile:
Reply 143
About the question about T=3/2 dont u guys think it should be multiplied by 4 for because T=(4m)gcos(theta)
Because the 2 particles have a joint mass of 4m instead of m?
Reply 144
For the question with vertical circular motion, what was the tension in the string when the string made a 60 degree angle?
Reply 145
Swayum
For the question with vertical circular motion, what was the tension in the string when the string made a 60 degree angle?

3MG/2
Reply 146
Damn, I got like T = mg(1 + root3/2). Obviously, I used either sin instead of cos or cos instead of sin.
Reply 147
Sepulamb
About the question about T=3/2 dont u guys think it should be multiplied by 4 for because T=(4m)gcos(theta)
Because the 2 particles have a joint mass of 4m instead of m?


No, because it combines afterwards when it is vertically below the center
Reply 148
Swayum
Damn, I got like T = mg(1 + root3/2). Obviously, I used either sin instead of cos or cos instead of sin.


I see that you used sin60 instead of cos
Swayum
Damn, I got like T = mg(1 + root3/2). Obviously, I used either sin instead of cos or cos instead of sin.


I did what everyone else did, but I'm not sure that it was right. How did you decide what the tension actually must be equal to?
Reply 150
LJoll
I did what everyone else did, but I'm not sure that it was right. How did you decide what the tension actually must be equal to?


Only had about 5 mins to do the entire question (what was it like 15 marks?!) and I just couldn't figure out where the angle goes so I guessed it. The 50-50-90 rule screwed me over again (whenever you have a 50-50 chance of getting something right, there's a 90% chance you'll get it wrong).

Basicly just resolved towards the centre of the circle, so that's T - component_of_mg = ma. And the component of mg is always sin(theta) or cos(theta). I got it as sin(theta).
Reply 151
LJoll
I did what everyone else did, but I'm not sure that it was right. How did you decide what the tension actually must be equal to?


I used this for part a)
T-mgcos60= mv^2/a

mgh=1/2mv^2
mgacos60 = 1/2 mv^2
v^2 = ga

since T-mgcos60= mv^2/a

T-mgcos60= mg
T= mg(1+cos60) = 3mg/2
Reply 152
saklut
I used this for part a)
T-mgcos60= mv^2/a

mgh=1/2mv^2
mgacos60 = 1/2 mv^2
v^2 = ga

since T-mgcos60= mv^2/a

T-mgcos60= mg
T= mg(1+cos60) = 3mg/2


I did the exact same thing and got 6mg... just because instead of mg i put 4mg (the combined mass of the two particles)

Do u guys think it will be wrong?
Not sure about the paper... last year you needed like 65/75 to even get an A so im hoping this year the boundaries are lower.

Q3 where you had to show (omega)^2 is greater than or equal to h/g (may have been less than or equal to)... I got to show omega was equal to that but why would it also be less / greater than? I'm guessing you had to explain that bit to get the full 8 marks...
Reply 154
republican1990
Not sure about the paper... last year you needed like 65/75 to even get an A so im hoping this year the boundaries are lower.

Q3 where you had to show (omega)^2 is greater than or equal to h/g (may have been less than or equal to)... I got to show omega was equal to that but why would it also be less / greater than? I'm guessing you had to explain that bit to get the full 8 marks...


It is in contact with the table, hence there might be a normal reaction force from the table. The maximum value of tension is when there is no reaction force. I started by saying Tcos&#952;<=mg and then you can proceed to get the final inequality.
saklut
It is in contact with the table, hence there might be a normal reaction force from the table. The maximum value of tension is when there is no reaction force. I started by saying Tcos&#952;<=mg and then you can proceed to get the final inequality.


Ah yes I should have realised that cause I started with a normal reaction R and realised I wasnt getting anywhere so i redid it assuming R = 0. Although I did find somewhere to randomly put a <= sign and continue using it from there. Not sure if the examiner will fall for it though!
republican1990
Q3 where you had to show (omega)^2 is greater than or equal to h/g (may have been less than or equal to)... I got to show omega was equal to that but why would it also be less / greater than? I'm guessing you had to explain that bit to get the full 8 marks...

Q3.(a):

Resolving vertically: Tcosθ=mgRT\cos\theta = mg - R

N2L horizontally: Tsinθ=mrω2T\sin\theta = mr\omega^2

Therefore: tanθ=mrω2mgR\tan\theta = \displaystyle\frac{mr\omega^2}{mg - R}

By trigonometry: r=htanθr = h\tan\theta

Substituting in: tanθ=mhtanθω2mgR\tan\theta = \displaystyle\frac{mh\tan\theta\omega^2}{mg - R}

Giving: mgR=mhω2mg - R = mh\omega^2

Therefore: R=m(ghω2)R = m(g - h\omega^2)

The particle is on the table so: R0R \geq 0

Giving:ghω20g - h\omega^2 \geq 0

Therefore: hω2gh\omega^2 \leq g

And finally: ω2gh\displaystyle\omega^2 \leq \frac{g}{h}
alex_hk90
Q3.(a):

Resolving vertically: Tcosθ=mgRT\cos\theta = mg - R

N2L horizontally: Tsinθ=mrω2T\sin\theta = mr\omega^2

Therefore: tanθ=mrω2mgR\tan\theta = \displaystyle\frac{mr\omega^2}{mg - R}

By trigonometry: r=htanθr = h\tan\theta

Substituting in: tanθ=mhtanθω2mgR\tan\theta = \displaystyle\frac{mh\tan\theta\omega^2}{mg - R}

Giving: mgR=mhω2mg - R = mh\omega^2

Therefore: R=m(ghω2)R = m(g - h\omega^2)

The particle is on the table so: R0R \geq 0

Giving:ghω20g - h\omega^2 \geq 0

Therefore: hω2gh\omega^2 \leq g

And finally: ω2gh\displaystyle\omega^2 \leq \frac{g}{h}


Yeah I did something kind of similar but as I said I just randomly put a => in somewhere! Thanks!
Reply 158
the last question was awful!
and i got that it didn't topple as well with the angle of 12.9
i really hope the boundaries are low.......
Reply 159
how low do u guys think the boundary will go... 50 i hope?? :s

Latest

Trending

Trending