The Student Room Group

Energetics Alevel chem multiple choice

Q5.
Which reaction has an enthalpy change equal to the standard enthalpy of formation of lithium fluoride?
A
Li(g) + F2(g) LiF(s)
B Li+(g) + F–(g) LiF(s)
C Li+(aq) + F–(aq) LiF(s)
D
Q6.
Two reactions of iron with oxygen are shown.
(1) (Total 13 marks)
Li(s) + F2(g) LiF(s)
(Total 1 mark)
Fe(s) + O2(g) FeO(s)
ΔH = 272 kJ mol–1 ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
What is the enthalpy change, in kJ mol–1, for this reaction?
2 FeO(s) + O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
A +550 B –278 C –1094 D –1372

Reply 1

Original post by zara ijaz
Q5.
Which reaction has an enthalpy change equal to the standard enthalpy of formation of lithium fluoride?
A
Li(g) + F2(g) LiF(s)
B Li+(g) + F–(g) LiF(s)
C Li+(aq) + F–(aq) LiF(s)
D
Q6.
Two reactions of iron with oxygen are shown.
(1) (Total 13 marks)
Li(s) + F2(g) LiF(s)
(Total 1 mark)
Fe(s) + O2(g) FeO(s)
ΔH = 272 kJ mol–1 ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
What is the enthalpy change, in kJ mol–1, for this reaction?
2 FeO(s) + O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
A +550 B –278 C –1094 D –1372


The first question requires you to know the definition of formation enthalpy. If you don't know it, look it up.

The second question contains a typo: Fe(s) + O2(g) FeO(s) is not balanced

Reply 2

Original post by charco
The first question requires you to know the definition of formation enthalpy. If you don't know it, look it up.

The second question contains a typo: Fe(s) + O2(g) FeO(s) is not balanced

Enthalpy of formation is the enthalpy change when 1 mole of a substance is formed from its constituent elements but I’m not sure how that applies to the question

Also for the second one it’s :
Fe(s) + 1/2O2 (g) -> FeO(s)

Reply 3

Original post by zara ijaz
Enthalpy of formation is the enthalpy change when 1 mole of a substance is formed from its constituent elements but I’m not sure how that applies to the question

Also for the second one it’s :
Fe(s) + 1/2O2 (g) -> FeO(s)


So, using the definition of formation enthalpy, you can now write down the equation that represents the formation of lithium fluoride.
However, there is also a typo in both the question and the answer ...

Reply 4

Two reactions of iron with oxygen are shown.
(Total 1 mark)
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s) ΔH = 272 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
What is the enthalpy change, in kJ mol–1, for this reaction?
2 FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
A +550 B –278 C –1094 D –1372
that is the actual question without typos, can someone explain why the answer is B
(edited 1 year ago)
Original post by student72876
Two reactions of iron with oxygen are shown.
(Total 1 mark)
equation 1: Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s) ΔH = 272 kJ mol–1
equation 2: 2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
What is the enthalpy change, in kJ mol–1, for this reaction?
2 FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s)
A +550 B –278 C –1094 D –1372
that is the actual question without typos, can someone explain why the answer is B


In order to generate the required equation, you must take equation 1:
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s)
reverse it and multiply by 2 to give:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1

Then add this equation to equation 2:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
---------------------------------------------- add
2FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = +544 - 822 = -278 kJ

Reply 6

Original post by charco
In order to generate the required equation, you must take equation 1:
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s)
reverse it and multiply by 2 to give:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1

Then add this equation to equation 2:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1t
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
---------------------------------------------- add
2FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = +544 - 822 = -278 kJ


thankyouuu :smile:

Reply 7

Original post by charco
In order to generate the required equation, you must take equation 1:
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s)
reverse it and multiply by 2 to give:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
Then add this equation to equation 2:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
---------------------------------------------- add
2FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = +544 - 822 = -278 kJ

i dont get why i didnt understand at first im so cooked. Anyways I appreciate it too

Reply 8

Original post by charco
In order to generate the required equation, you must take equation 1:
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s)
reverse it and multiply by 2 to give:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
Then add this equation to equation 2:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
---------------------------------------------- add
2FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = +544 - 822 = -278 kJ

hi, why would you reverse equation 1's sign?

Reply 9

Original post by s39484ny
hi, why would you reverse equation 1's sign?

The law of conservation of energy. If you reverse an equation you change the sign.
The same energy is released going one way as is absorbed going the other way.

Reply 10

Original post by charco
The law of conservation of energy. If you reverse an equation you change the sign.
The same energy is released going one way as is absorbed going the other way.

thank you! would this apply to any of this type of question? e.g. dissociation, enthalpy changes

Reply 11

Original post by s39484ny
thank you! would this apply to any of this type of question? e.g. dissociation, enthalpy changes

yes

Reply 12

Original post by charco
In order to generate the required equation, you must take equation 1:
Fe(s) + 1/2 O2(g) FeO(s)
reverse it and multiply by 2 to give:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
Then add this equation to equation 2:
2FeO(s) 2Fe(s) + O2(g) ΔH = +544 kJ mol–1
2 Fe(s) + 3/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = 822 kJ mol–1
---------------------------------------------- add
2FeO(s) + 1/2 O2(g) Fe2O3(s) ΔH = +544 - 822 = -278 kJ

Why do you reverse the first equation and then add it to the 2nd

Reply 13

Original post by minnnnnnnnnnnn
Why do you reverse the first equation and then add it to the 2nd

Try drawing a Hess cycle for this reaction - essentially you end up doing exactly as Charco describes, but it perhaps is more obvious from a visual standpoint as to why.

Quick Reply