I want to study Computer Science at university and am choosing my a-level options. I have already chosen to do maths, further maths and computer science, although I'm torn between economics and physics as a fourth option.I should be honest and state that I was not a fan of physics at all at GCSE level. I just found it quite a weird subject, rather dull and incredibly confusing in parts (electromagnetism, waves and electricity amongst others). I'm a bit worried about how well I'll be able to cope with the a-level content. I'm probably going to get a grade 8 or possibly a 9 for it, though I did switch from combined to triple science halfway through year 11 and had to teach myself most of the physics only content. My teacher wasn't exactly great either. Some people say it gets more interesting at A-level - but does it really, or is that just what the hardcore physics fans think?I prefer the sound of economics and could imagine myself enjoying the subject, although I haven't studied it before. I am a bit worried it might just involve remembering a lot of slightly boring information and theories, which I think would frustrate me and especially if they're essentially just dressed-up common sense. I also think it's seen as a slightly softer option, though studying it I would probably find it a lot easier to get an A/A* than Physics. I would also be willing to consider it as a backup degree option.I don't want to seem arrogant but I am looking at Russell Group / Oxbridge courses ideally depending on how my a-levels go, and I'm predicted mostly 8s and 9s at GCSE. Although Physics isn't directly specified anywhere as an entry requirement for CS, it does seem like the top universities almost expect you to do it a a given, and I feel like pretty much everyone other applicant looking to study CS will be. Essentially, I don't want to put myself at a disadvantage by not choosing it.It would be great to hear any opinions/stories/advice. Thank you!