Law Applicants 2011 Offer Thread

Cold, Northern Durham.

That's good ****. There's nothing proper like that where I live. All of the more obscure, undergrounds stuff gets shut down. And the main clubs only do top40/mainstream trance.



Throw an extra layer on/drink an extra pint and its all good!

Thank God that Cambidge gave me an offer 'cos Warwick was going to be my firm.

I would disagree and say that Bristol and Brum are on a par/Bristol only edges out Brum marginally. Also, the Law admissions talk at the Bristol Open Day was so awful.

Got a rejected from UCL for law today cos of LNAT. see below..


Your application is no longer being considered by University College London (University of London) for Law, M100 because either they have decided not to offer you a place or your application has been withdrawn. The reason is given below.
Your application has been unsuccessful

Regrettably, your performance in the LNAT does not meet the required level for further consideration of your application.

Whilst I understand that the LNAT could be a quite good indicator of your potential to be a law student, I just find it strange that whilst UCL rejected me based on my LNAT score , I got a straight(meaning not pooled) offer from Cambridge to study Law and I had to sit the Cambridge Law Test and have 2 interviews...the professors themselves must have seen that I had the potential to be a law student so perhaps, Im not saying in all cases, the LNAT is not the best indicator

Just putting my own experience out there

A lot of the reasons for being rejected by either UCL or Kings and acceptance into Cambridge is largely based on the Unis you apply to. UCL don't like it if you apply to Kings, and usually reject people just for that i know it's stupid and you can say i'm wrong but i highly think it's true. And it's pretty much the same with oxbridge.

You can think it's true all you like; the fact remains, however, that uni's don't see your other choices.

Really? I'm sure they do! They see your whole UCAS application where all your choices are written. I'm positive they do.

Really? I'm sure they do! They see your whole UCAS application where all your choices are written. I'm positive they do.

Predictions: A*History, A*engligh lit, A* spanish, A econ. predictions,
AS grades: A History, A English lit, A Spanish, A in econ, B in French.

LSE REJECTION FOR LAW.
so unbelievably gutted.
I have no idea what more they wanted, I had tons of work experience with UK renowned barristers, work experience abroad even, Queen Mary's said my personal statement was exceptional, my GCSEs were 6 A*s and 5 As.

And LSE, my top choice, rejected me.
This has to be based on luck

North > South.
That's my comment for this hour. Stay tuned for my 1 am comment.

They don't see the same thing we see when we look at Apply/Track. I saw what mine looked like at my Oxford interview, they don't see your other choices. So your inter-university conspiracy theory isn't true, I'm afraid. Where did you hear it from?

...That's a little, odd.

Probably a red herring. It's difficult not to give a obvious answer to that one, "er no..." and if you agreed with the statement, universities would be like !

University of Leicester
Offer: ABB
Started Date: 29th Dec 2010
Offer Received: 26th Jan 2011

I am an International Student.
Perdicted Grade: AAAB
Ielts: 7.5

I am soooooo happy because Leicester is the place I most wanted to go!!!
I hv no idea why they lower their entry offer by this much, but they just did lol
I hate to think in this way but they might do that because of the Tuition issue ( we pay loads more)
If thats the truth, i will be heart-broken ...

did anyone else get offer like this from Leicester?

I did that question