Count to a MINUS million and be the first forum to do it! (Part 2)

Also, found this:

Seriously, why do people randomly bump such old threads?

I know why - I do this on the Virgin Media forums too - people bump old threads for no reason than to bump old threads. :yep:

-10985

Reply 945

Original post by spotify95

Are you the person that created the Dancing Cactus account? :wink:

If so, fantastic thread bump! :happy2:

And thanks for the rep! :smile:

-10984

Yes it was me! :yep:

Sadly can't even log into the puppet any longer. The dialog box for the login just returns an account disabled error, yet as you can see in the thread, I'm not inactive. :confused:

I've got a list of other threads from 2000/2001 I'm planning on bumping in the future.

-10986. :rolleyes:

Reply 946

Original post by pinkteddyx64

Yes it was me! :yep:

Sadly can't even log into the puppet any longer. The dialog box for the login just returns an account disabled error, yet as you can see in the thread, I'm not inactive. :confused:

I've got a list of other threads from 2000/2001 I'm planning on bumping in the future.

-10986. :rolleyes:

PRSOM - fantastic thread bump there! :smile:

Oh dear, they haven't started deleting accounts have they? Would sending a message to the Contact Us box, about being unable to log in, help at all? :smile:

That's a good idea, if you can get any accounts validated.

Though remember our ultimate aim in the new year - which, if all is successful, we will get our accounts back and won't have to bump really old threads. :yep:

-10,987

Reply 947

Original post by spotify95

PRSOM - fantastic thread bump there! :smile:

Oh dear, they haven't started deleting accounts have they? Would sending a message to the Contact Us box, about being unable to log in, help at all? :smile:

That's a good idea, if you can get any accounts validated.

Though remember our ultimate aim in the new year - which, if all is successful, we will get our accounts back and won't have to bump really old threads. :yep:

-10,987

If the account was deleted, it would show the user as:

<username>

Posts: N/A

If we're successful, we can bump as many threads as we want, regardless of the date and ban anyone criticising us for it. :yep;

-10988. :tongue:

Reply 948

Original post by pinkteddyx64

If the account was deleted, it would show the user as:

<username>

Posts: N/A

If we're successful, we can bump as many threads as we want, regardless of the date and ban anyone criticising us for it. :yep:

-10988.

I remember the n/a thing, if you de-register it becomes "guest"

On my tessa.bubbles account (can't remember who created it for me but it was a fellow TSR'ian :smile:

) when the mods found it was me, they didn't ban it, but de-regged it and made it n/a!!!! :mad:

Yep, and I would certainly make sure that all of the threads on the same subject would be merged - regardless of date - so the place looked more tidy. :smile:

Also, I remember that threads used to have to stop at 3,000 posts - any that stopped that early would be re-organized to a proper number! :smile:

-10989

Reply 949

Original post by spotify95

I remember the n/a thing, if you de-register it becomes "guest"

On my tessa.bubbles account (can't remember who created it for me but it was a fellow TSR'ian :smile:

) when the mods found it was me, they didn't ban it, but de-regged it and made it n/a!!!! :mad:

Yep, and I would certainly make sure that all of the threads on the same subject would be merged - regardless of date - so the place looked more tidy. :smile:

Also, I remember that threads used to have to stop at 3,000 posts - any that stopped that early would be re-organized to a proper number! :smile:

-10989

I mean like the starter of this thread for example, where their account isn't even clickable: http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1462

-10990. :mad:

Reply 950

Original post by pinkteddyx64

I mean like the starter of this thread for example, where their account isn't even clickable: http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1462

-10990. :mad:

Aah okay I get what you mean there, different thing... I take it that was due to voluntary de-registration? :smile:

And thanks for linking me to yet another of your thread bumps (this thread is 12 years old!!!!!!), I love it so much when I see old threads resurrected on the digital forums! :biggrin:

-10991

edit: Then the ****ing fascist come along and post this:

[QUOTE=FASCISTS!]Please don't bump such old threads - start a new one.

(edited 9 years ago)

Reply 951