Belgium attacks: Yet again, just the standard response and no action
Scroll to see replies
Original post by SMEGGGY
It's been repeated time and time and time again each time a terror attack takes place around the world. I'm not defending it in any form BUT why is Latin America never attacked? There are many countries there yet they never experience such 'Islamic' atrocities? Because they DO NOT INTERFERE IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES OR STEAL THEIR OIL!
Foreign policy of the WEST is the only reason but this is deliberately ignored as the truth staring them in their faces is best to be brushed under the carpet as WE in the WEST don't want to change it.
Al-Queda and now ISIS is our creation, we have to.accept it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Foreign policy of the WEST is the only reason but this is deliberately ignored as the truth staring them in their faces is best to be brushed under the carpet as WE in the WEST don't want to change it.
Al-Queda and now ISIS is our creation, we have to.accept it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Talk me through little, inoffensive, inconsequential Belgium's role in the Middle East? We are all ears...
Did Belgium interfere in Syria? Were Belgian planes bombing Libya? Have Belgian troops blazed a murderous trail right across the Muslim lands?
Or are you talking out of the part of your anatomy wher the sun doesn't shine?
This is nothing to do with Belgian foreign policy (to the extent it even has one). Your tired, worn out lying leftish narratives need a refresh.
No-one is listening any more.
Original post by generallee
I don't think you understand what is happening at all.
Sadly, one day you will.
Sadly, one day you will.
What ?
The virtue-signalling going on in Brussels right now is sickening.
Original post by Cato the Elder
The virtue-signalling going on in Brussels right now is sickening.
Showing solidarity with the victims (the dead, injured, and the Muslims who now face a backlash) is not sickening. It is heartening
Original post by Slipandsquirm
What a story, eh?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by SMEGGGY
It's been repeated time and time and time again each time a terror attack takes place around the world. I'm not defending it in any form BUT why is Latin America never attacked? There are many countries there yet they never experience such 'Islamic' atrocities? Because they DO NOT INTERFERE IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES OR STEAL THEIR OIL!
Foreign policy of the WEST is the only reason but this is deliberately ignored as the truth staring them in their faces is best to be brushed under the carpet as WE in the WEST don't want to change it.
Al-Queda and now ISIS is our creation, we have to.accept it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Foreign policy of the WEST is the only reason but this is deliberately ignored as the truth staring them in their faces is best to be brushed under the carpet as WE in the WEST don't want to change it.
Al-Queda and now ISIS is our creation, we have to.accept it.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Latin America has not been attacked because they haven't had mass Muslim immigration on the European scale.
There are hardly any Muslims living there.
Japan has no domestic Islamic terrorism too. Also because they dont have any Muslims. Thet don't let them migrate there. Funnily enough a Japanese hostage was beheaded by IS recently despite Japan's complete lack of foreign policy intervention in the Middle East.
If foreign policy drives this why? And why is neutral Belgium the epicentre of Jihadism?
This is a civil war within the Muslim world, which we have become dragged into because we accepted millions of Muslim immigrants, unlike Latin America and Japan.
If there weren't Muslim ghettoes in Brussels there would have been no terrorism.
We will have attacks in the future from our Muslim ghettoes. As will France, and Germany soon too...
Original post by Frank Underwood
So because you have never seen a Muslim girl marrying a non-Muslim, you make the assumption that Muslins don't integrate?
My neighbour is a male who went to study Arabic and married a Muslim woman, and he was atheist before.
My neighbour is a male who went to study Arabic and married a Muslim woman, and he was atheist before.
I don't make an assumption I assert it as a fact.
The day Muslim women are allowed to marry atheists will be the day they start to integrate.
Original post by JezWeCan!
I don't make an assumption I assert it as a fact.
The day Muslim women are allowed to marry atheists will be the day they start to integrate.
The day Muslim women are allowed to marry atheists will be the day they start to integrate.
In other words, you just went full ignorant
Original post by Frank Underwood
In other words, you just went full ignorant
No, I just know what the words I use actually mean.
Integration is defined by the dictionary as "the bringing of people of different racial or ethnic groups into unrestricted and equal association" and has as its synonyms, "combination, blending, fusing."
A "community" which explicitly forbids its women from having relationships and children with outsiders (the men can do so of course) is not permitting unrestricted and equal association. Let alone ethnic combination, blending or fusing.
Original post by JezWeCan!
No, I just know what the words I use actually mean.
Integration is defined by the dictionary as "the bringing of people of different racial or ethnic groups into unrestricted and equal association" and has as its synonyms, "combination, blending, fusing."
A "community" which explicitly forbids its women from having relationships and children with outsiders (the men can do so of course) is not permitting unrestricted and equal association. Let alone ethnic combination, blending or fusing.
Integration is defined by the dictionary as "the bringing of people of different racial or ethnic groups into unrestricted and equal association" and has as its synonyms, "combination, blending, fusing."
A "community" which explicitly forbids its women from having relationships and children with outsiders (the men can do so of course) is not permitting unrestricted and equal association. Let alone ethnic combination, blending or fusing.
You're implying that marriage is the only means for two cultures to integrate. There are hundreds of ways that this can happen.
Original post by Frank Underwood
You're implying that marriage is the only means for two cultures to integrate. There are hundreds of ways that this can happen.
Producing children between different cultures is far and away the best means of integration ever devised by mankind.
The English were a meld of Angles, Saxons, Vikings and Normans and Celts. And now, Jamaicans, Sri Lankans, French, etc etc etc all form part of a gloriously diverse gene and cultural pool. Do you not understand how wonderful that is?
Forbid marriage (actually forbid the women from even meeting people outside the ethnic and religious "in" group), and then start to insist on separate education on religious lines, and you embed deliberate separation and division, and a consequent failure to integrate.
In fact is is actually quite fascistic to so insist on racial and religious "purity." I am surprised you don't realise this.
The logical inconsistencies and absurdities of "identity politics" have made it disappear up its own arse, I guess, and you can't see things which are obvious to everyone else because it is so dark in there.
Original post by JezWeCan!
Producing children between different cultures is far and away the best means of integration ever devised by mankind.
The English were a meld of Angles, Saxons, Vikings and Normans and Celts. And now, Jamaicans, Sri Lankans, French, etc etc etc all form part of a gloriously diverse gene and cultural pool. Do you not understand how wonderful that is?
Forbid marriage (actually forbid the women from even meeting people outside the ethnic and religious "in" group), and then start to insist on separate education on religious lines, and you embed deliberate separation and division, and a consequent failure to integrate.
In fact is is actually quite fascistic to so insist on racial and religious "purity." I am surprised you don't realise this.
The logical inconsistencies and absurdities of "identity politics" have made it disappear up its own arse, I guess, and you can't see things which are obvious to everyone else because it is so dark in there.
The English were a meld of Angles, Saxons, Vikings and Normans and Celts. And now, Jamaicans, Sri Lankans, French, etc etc etc all form part of a gloriously diverse gene and cultural pool. Do you not understand how wonderful that is?
Forbid marriage (actually forbid the women from even meeting people outside the ethnic and religious "in" group), and then start to insist on separate education on religious lines, and you embed deliberate separation and division, and a consequent failure to integrate.
In fact is is actually quite fascistic to so insist on racial and religious "purity." I am surprised you don't realise this.
The logical inconsistencies and absurdities of "identity politics" have made it disappear up its own arse, I guess, and you can't see things which are obvious to everyone else because it is so dark in there.
You missed my point, it's not the only means of integration. And whether or not it's the 'best' is open to interpretation.
Original post by Frank Underwood
You missed my point, it's not the only means of integration. And whether or not it's the 'best' is open to interpretation.
If you don't believe it is the best, you are free to suggest a better means?
And what other methods are you thinking of? Joining the armed forces is a fantastic way of integrating. Common suffering in the trenches transformed the class system after WW1. But there are more UK Muslims fighting for the Islamic State than serve in the British Army, so that's out.
Living together as neighbours? Go to Muslim dominated towns and cities like Bradford, Luton, Tower Hamlets, Slough, Blackburn and Birmingham and you will see de facto housing segregation. This leads to schools being divided also on a catchment area basis.
How about university? Well I'll leave others to comment on that.
I am not saying there isn't hope for integration, and surely it must come with time. But the ban on relationships outside the faith (for women) is a huge barrier to it.
As are primitive, antediluvian views on homosexuality, apostasy, sex before marriage, honour killings, female genital mutilation, ya de ya de ya...
Original post by JezWeCan!
If you don't believe it is the best, you are free to suggest a better means?
And what other methods are you thinking of? Joining the armed forces is a fantastic way of integrating. Common suffering in the trenches transformed the class system after WW1. But there are more UK Muslims fighting for the Islamic State than serve in the British Army, so that's out.
Living together as neighbours? Go to Muslim dominated towns and cities like Bradford, Luton, Tower Hamlets, Slough, Blackburn and Birmingham and you will see de facto housing segregation. This leads to schools being divided also on a catchment area basis.
How about university? Well I'll leave others to comment on that.
I am not saying there isn't hope for integration, and surely it must come with time. But the ban on relationships outside the faith (for women) is a huge barrier to it.
As are primitive, antediluvian views on homosexuality, apostasy, sex before marriage, honour killings, female genital mutilation, ya de ya de ya...
And what other methods are you thinking of? Joining the armed forces is a fantastic way of integrating. Common suffering in the trenches transformed the class system after WW1. But there are more UK Muslims fighting for the Islamic State than serve in the British Army, so that's out.
Living together as neighbours? Go to Muslim dominated towns and cities like Bradford, Luton, Tower Hamlets, Slough, Blackburn and Birmingham and you will see de facto housing segregation. This leads to schools being divided also on a catchment area basis.
How about university? Well I'll leave others to comment on that.
I am not saying there isn't hope for integration, and surely it must come with time. But the ban on relationships outside the faith (for women) is a huge barrier to it.
As are primitive, antediluvian views on homosexuality, apostasy, sex before marriage, honour killings, female genital mutilation, ya de ya de ya...
I'm talking about cultural integration of a race. Two people getting married is a tiny microscopic view of the bigger picture. This means simply that people from different cultures migrate here, they live here, they get jobs and they start businesses and they start contributing to our democracy - just like Sadiq Khan who is a Muslim running for mayor. Muslims don't have to marry non-Muslims to integrate, you can have Muslim families living amongst us.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- Moscow concert hall shooting: at least 40 people dead and 100 wounded
- Terrorist NHS worker planned to bomb hospital
- Shooting in Brussels. Shooter still at large.
- Really worried about Boyfriends sickness
- Ask any questions about Belgium!
- [Official thread] Hamas-Israel Conflict
- GSK Future Leaders Programme 2022
- How many countries have you been to?
- Unconscious bias - is it time to rethink how we address VAWG?
- Unit 11 Cybersecurity Scenario?
- how could anyone be pro-israel?
- Which 2024 election will be most significant for the world?
- Want to sue the university
- Laptop -- is this too cheap?
- Customer Services Group - Operational Delivery - Administrative Officers - 317907
- Am I suffering from PTSD?
- University response - nursing
- USA bombing Syria
- Can someone please give me feedback on this essay?
- I think i'm losing a friendship because of the Israel-Palestine conflict
Latest
Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 3 days ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 3 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 3 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
