No it's marketed as something for men. Diet Pepsi is predominantly bought by women.
Hm... I'm more than likely too young to remember the Pepsi advertising campaigns. That being said they definitely weren't recent, which is probably why this one is kicking up more of a fuss, since in this decade there's been a lot of push on gender equality. For someone to then come out and say women need daintier crisps seems a bit daft.
Hm... I'm more than likely too young to remember the Pepsi advertising campaigns. That being said they definitely weren't recent, which is probably why this one is kicking up more of a fuss, since in this decade there's been a lot of push on gender equality.
Fair point, but there are plenty of other examples of gendered products out there: toys, cosmetics and so on. There might not be quite so many when it comes to food there's still quite a few, especially in the snack aisles. Walkers Max and McCoy's sit on the same shelf as Doritos planned new product would.
For someone to then come out and say women need daintier crisps seems a bit daft.
Just as a point of clarity, what was said in the interview is that women are more likely to buy "dainty" crisps, according to their research. Not that they need them.
Advertisement is not the only form of marketing. Far from it really. This ruling won't make as big of a difference as you might expect, though it's still a step in the right direction, I think.
Brilliant marketing/ advertising technique, grab everyone's attention with a sensitive social issue (maybe even make people angry) and you have more attention on your product.