Militant vegans storm steak house

Lol to be honest mate i only eat some meats , just cause i dont like the taste of a lot of them, but if someone wants to eat cats and dogs i really dont care.

i would care if they were forcing me to eat it.

same way i dont care if youre vegan, dont be a fkin cnt about it and act like these obviouisly handicapped militants who forgot that forcing your opinions on other people is fascism. you lot are hypocrites of the highest level. im not gonna storm a vegan restaurant and force everyone to eat meat

also im very well aware this does not represent all vegans, in fact 5-6 of my friends are vegan, and they disagree with this militant BS. I also have considered being vegan for a very long time, but i do not like the stigma attached to it, caused by people like you

Nearly Friendless Nick is back with his silver-tongued charm to tempt us over to the dark side.

There is nothing wrong with eating dog. Poodle, apparently, tastes a lot like chicken.

no its not lol

in my opinion, and most non vegan opinions, humans =/= cows pigs chickens etc so you cant even use that as an argument.

Er no that's not what I said at all
Catch you later ttingtox

at which point are they dead in this story ? im interested.

Well in a nazis opinion Jews =/= arryan so I can use that argument

To the kkk their opinion is Blacks =/= Whites and they would think there is nothing wrong with killing blacks and going by your logic anyone that says that is wrong is forcing their opinion onto the kkk.

Nearly Friendless Nick is back with his silver-tongued charm to tempt us over to the dark side.

There is nothing wrong with eating dog. Poodle, apparently, tastes a lot like chicken.

Their suffering is equal as they go through the same suffering. Whether you care about that suffering or not is another thing.

Its like a person who beliefs its wrong to kill Jews being told by a nazi to stop forcing their opinions onto everyone.

my logic doesnt separate by race but by species actually so you're wrong again.

may i ask politically where you lay on the spectrum ? left / far left / right ./ far right / centre?
and also if you agree with these militant vegans?

Yes but their logic seperates it by race so you' can't use an argument that it wrong to kill black people against them going on what you were just saying.

the poster above is right - veganism in its current form, as a position is far beyond just a choice of what to eat or what not to eat.

Its a moral ideology, and one that if you subscribe to, you can't help but want everyone to become vegan. Its the logical end to the position. If it were a simple preference, then they wouldn't want it to spread, but its not its more like a religion - it needs to spread, because for those who agree with it its the only right, moral and just way to live.. and its the only way to end suffering.

in this case, murder is wrong.

That is your opinion.

In my opinion killing animals is wrong. You expect me to respect people decisions that lead to the suffering and killing of billions of animals even though I find it morally wrong? If I don't then I am forcing my opinion onto people?

Well going by that logic you should respect peoples choice to murder and rape even though you find it morally wrong. And if you don't then you are forcing your opinion onto people.

Regardless of your stance on this matter, participating in acts of terror hoping for a hecklers veto is not the way to come to an agreement.

The only reason vegans oppose killing animals for food is because pain and suffering of animals is easy to relate to, triggering an emotional reaction. Eating plants hurts the ecosystem, so do we stop that? Moreover, some studies provided evidence that plants can "feel" pain, through production of gasses. Of course, since you can't hear the plant screaming out in pain, their suffering is trivial I suppose(!) So now what, we stop eating plants as well? If you are willing to starve to be morally correct (whatever that means), be my guest. But don't dictate your values to those with different views, let alone turn to violence.

imo non-vegans should have to visit a slaughter house if they want to conitnue supporting animal suffering. "invitro" meats are being developed and hopefully in the future it will be possible to eat meat with minimal animal suffering and no need to slaughter an animal. bacon is a class 1 carcinogen btw - might want to reconsider eating a faux alternative for your own health, if not for the animals/environment

so do you think that forcing opinion is acceptable in all, or some cases?

im struggling to see how you equate breaking the law with militant veganism .

do you force everyone to agree with you with everything ?

That argument simply doesn't work on someone who doesn't have the same axiomatic belief as you that cows, pigs and chickens are equal to humans.

Ok well if you think its wrong to rape then be my guest. But don't you dare dictate your values to those with a different views (I.e. rapists).

or do you think its ok to dictate your values to some people because you personally find what they are doing to be morally wrong?