Wrote this article for my student paper, sums my feelings up about it:
Yesterday England coach Sven Goran Eriksson announced to the shocked assembled media that he would be taking Theo Walcott a 17 year old striker to the World Cup over experienced Darren Bent and Jermaine Defoe.
Theo Walcott is undeniably a gamble. The teenager has never played once in the Premiership and only ever played under 19 international football. The decision is even more risky considering Michael Owen and Wayne Rooney are both recovering from injuries and this leaves only Peter Crouch as the only fit striker apart from Walcott.
So why has Sven taken such a big gamble on such a relevantly unknown player? Perhaps most obvious answer is that Sven has nothing to lose. If Walcott is a flop at the World Cup, Eriksson will not have to deal with the consequences after announcing he would leave his post at the end of the tournament. With this imminent departure of Eriksson he may not feel as pressured to take less risky players to Germany. Although some may feel angry that he is taking undue risks with a team he won’t be responsible for soon, I believe that taking Walcott to Germany is the right decision that may be able to replace that spark that England appeared to have lost when Wayne Rooney left Old Trafford on a stretcher.
Firstly Walcott is a talented footballer. Everyone who has seen him play has been blown away by his pace and trickery. There is a reason why Arsenal paid £5 million for a 16 year old schoolboy a year ago. His pace is truly frightening. Every single coach and manager who has seen Walcott play have all commented on Walcott’s ability to cause trouble for defences.
Another reason and perhaps most key, is that practically no-one outside England has even heard of Theo Walcott before this week. This means that no manager will have any idea how to play against Walcott. Whereas managers of England’s opposing group B teams Sweden, Paraguay and Trinidad and Tobago will have had ideas for weeks on how to deal with the suspected England front players like Michael Owen, Peter Crouch and Jermaine Defoe. But after this weeks announcement these managers will be frantically trying to find tapes of Walcott playing to get some idea of what they are up against. In essence; Eriksson knows he will have the element of surprise if he introduces Walcott to a match.
Walcott is a gamble. But frankly if England are without a match fit Wayne Rooney, which is sadly looking very likely, which other strikers have better credentials to make an impact in Germany to accompany Owen and Crouch? Defoe, who can’t break into the Tottenham team or Darren Bent, who has not impressed for England given the chance by Eriksson. Neither in my opinion. It is a brave decision my Eriksson although it is possibly motivated by the wrong reasons. But it could give England Theo Walcott a chance to show how good he really is. And as the SAS say: ‘Who dares wins’