Please mark this 12 mark question on attachments! :) Watch

LeaX
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
#1
Psychologists have put forward different explanations of attachment, such as learning
theory and Bowlby’s theory.
Outline and evaluate one or more explanations of attachment. (12 marks)


Psychologists have many different explanations of attachments. One of which is Bowlby's evolutionary theory. He suggests that attachments are an innate, biological response to illicit care giving, and therefore survival, of the infant. This is achieved through social releasers, which as crying and their 'cute' appearance which appeals to the potential caregiver. According to Bowlby's theory of monotropy, this caregiver should be a woman. Bowlby suggests that a child's attachment acts as a template for their future relationships so a stable attachment is necessary for a socially successful individual.

However, Bowlby's theory is based on research in goslings, which innately imprint on the first large, moving object they see. It could be argued that birds can't be generalised to human behaviour. There is also criticism to monotropy, as research has shown hat babies can form secure attachments with their fathers, or even multiple attachments with both parents. A criticism of Bowlby is also the learning theory. This suggests that attachments are formed by reinforcement (classical conditioning) or association (operant conditioning) this criticises that attachments are innate. Another criticism is research into cross-cultural variations in attachments. If attachments are innate, they should be universal. However, the variations of attachment types suggests different.

Thank you.
0
reply
LeaX
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
#2
Please?

This is my first attempt at a 12 mark question (aside from my mock exam which I haven't yet received back) so I have no idea where I am at the moment, nor what I need to do to improve.
0
reply
LeaX
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 7 years ago
#3
Please?
0
reply
Saif95
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#4
Report 7 years ago
#4
Looks quite short tbh
0
reply
Cleoleo
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#5
Report 7 years ago
#5
Judging by the length, it'd be worth 5 marks max

You need to include a lot more research including A01 and A02 points... 3 research minimum

It says "one or more explanations of attachment"
they actually want you do to more than 1 though so defo compare to Ainsworth's theory and back up with research.

Make this at least 4 more times longer with more research and Ainsworth plus any other explanations you've learnt backed up with researh supporting and refuting, and you should be good
0
reply
Kelly95
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#6
Report 7 years ago
#6
I agree that it is quite short. Each paragraph is worth 6 marks. The first paragraph is A01 - the outline part. The second paragraph is A02 - the evaluate part. It's best to include two studies but I always do one in detail and then briefly outline an alternative explanation / findings after that. Then when I evaluate I focus on research methods because I find that's easier. Hope this helps a little
0
reply
xfirekittyx
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#7
Report 7 years ago
#7
(Original post by LeaX)
Psychologists have put forward different explanations of attachment, such as learning
theory and Bowlby’s theory.
Outline and evaluate one or more explanations of attachment. (12 marks)


Psychologists have many different explanations of attachments. One of which is Bowlby's evolutionary theory. He suggests that attachments are an innate, biological response to illicit care giving, and therefore survival, of the infant. This is achieved through social releasers, which as crying and their 'cute' appearance which appeals to the potential caregiver. According to Bowlby's theory of monotropy, this caregiver should be a woman. Bowlby suggests that a child's attachment acts as a template for their future relationships so a stable attachment is necessary for a socially successful individual.

However, Bowlby's theory is based on research in goslings, which innately imprint on the first large, moving object they see. It could be argued that birds can't be generalised to human behaviour. There is also criticism to monotropy, as research has shown hat babies can form secure attachments with their fathers, or even multiple attachments with both parents. A criticism of Bowlby is also the learning theory. This suggests that attachments are formed by reinforcement (classical conditioning) or association (operant conditioning) this criticises that attachments are innate. Another criticism is research into cross-cultural variations in attachments. If attachments are innate, they should be universal. However, the variations of attachment types suggests different.

Thank you.
Ok I feel really mean, but i'd give you 5/12. 4/6 for description, 1/6 for evaluation. Your description is better than your evaluation, however I think you described the internal working model, without naming it (although argubaly that is part of his psycho-dyanmic theory, depends are you doing aqa or edexcel, for aqa it's fine) and because you only gave description for one theory, i think you really needed to get as much as possible in there, i.e the maternal deprivation hypothesis. Description of Bowbly's 44 juvenile thieves study would too count as A01 Also, I can't remember if this is necceserary but you didn't actually define attachment, this would be a good introduction as you should write 12 markers like an essay.

Onto evaluation, the gosling studies are Lorenz's work, not Bowbly, this is a bit unclear from your wording. You haven't said WHY birds can not be generalised to human behaviour, (this would give you higher marks, I know it seems obvious but you have to pretend the examiner is a little child, saying why, why, why and explain everything). You haven't clearly explained why opererant or classical conditioning is a critism of attachment being innate. Again, I know it probabaly seems obvious to you that learning theory means, that something is learnt, therefore caused by environment, but you need to say this! You could have also made this more descriptive by saying how exactly (If i recall it's to do with food) Another good study to use would be Harry Harlow's rhebus monkeys if you wanted to evaluate learning theory and also supports the maternal deprivation hypothesis. Futhermore, I can't remember the researcher's name, but there is one about Israeli kibbutz's( even though the infants are with a 'metapelet' (type of nurse) for the majority of time, they show stronger attachment behaviour to their mother, supporting his idea of monotropy etc. ) For a 12 marker, I'd say you need to include 3/4 studies.
0
reply
Mephestic
Badges: 2
Rep:
?
#8
Report 7 years ago
#8
You need 6 various outlining points for to outline what attachments are and then atleast 3 developed evaluations points (strengths and weaknesses) on it supporting such a theory with research evidence or discrediting it with research.

3 points developed will equal 2 marks each.

Thats what I think.
0
reply
Misunderstood_08
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#9
Report 2 years ago
#9
Bowlby didn't do the study with the geese it was Lornez
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • University of the Arts London
    MA Performance Design and Practice Open Day Postgraduate
    Thu, 24 Jan '19
  • Brunel University London
    Undergraduate Experience Days Undergraduate
    Sat, 26 Jan '19
  • SOAS University of London
    Postgraduate Open Day Postgraduate
    Sat, 26 Jan '19

Are you chained to your phone?

Yes (56)
19.31%
Yes, but I'm trying to cut back (117)
40.34%
Nope, not that interesting (117)
40.34%

Watched Threads

View All