The Student Room Group

Is Psychology a science?

As above
Reply 1
na social science (source sh1tload of my teachers)
Short answer: it should be, but it isn't always. Many people include nonsense like Freud and qualitative methods in psychology when it should be kicked to be curb and mocked relentlessly.

It's the equivalent of including astrology in astrophysics.
Original post by Foo.mp3
Yes, it's a social science, as opposed to a hard science


But what is the difference?
Reply 4
its a pseudoscience. I act likes a science but has unscientific properties
Original post by Foo.mp3
Perceptions relating to method and objectivity e.g. 'soft', social sciences are seen as more wishy. In reality, method/objectivity/statistical certainty upon which theories achieving consensus vary considerably within each sub-domain


Ah, I think I see what you mean. So psychology is perceived as a soft science, but (some of it at least) is actually hard science, is that right? Which bits would you see actually are soft then?
Original post by Pugglet
I act likes a science but has unscientific properties


Namely?
Original post by Foo.mp3
The more highly theoretical and interpretive elements, the conjecture (which is, necessarily, rife in the social sciences, as humanity is such a complex and nuanced force)


Thanks. Which elements are you thinking of?
Reply 8
Original post by chazwomaq
Namely?


Lab studies. Very scientific but unlike a science it does not focus on just one causation and outcome. It acknowledges that there may be multiple reasons why something e.g. Depression occurs
Highly open to debate. It's sometime called a soft science.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending