The Student Room Group

[Official thread] Hamas-Israel Conflict

Scroll to see replies

Reply 80

Original post
by Zamestaneh
According to the Bible, the Jews conquered the lands from the natives after the exodus, so premising Israel on "right of return" is to mean they may return to lands that they conquered once upon a time - shoddy argument.
And the period of history under the control of any one religious group has been longer under Islam than Judaism, so on that from the Muslim Arabs of the levant/Palestine have greater claim to the area than Jews from different continents entirely.

The British have no right to "give" something that was not theirs to others who have no right to it either.

I will not get over you justifying antisemitism towards Palestinians. People with your attitude are what create those who commit terrorism.


Quote:

" And the period of history under the control of any one religious group has been longer under Islam than Judaism, so on that from the Muslim Arabs of the levant/Palestine have greater claim to the area than Jews from different continents entirely."

I'm a Saudi Arabian gay woman. Let me ask you a simple question: If the right to exist in a particular place on earth is, as you suggest, correlated by
(cf) longest period 'under control of any one religious group ' then since the Dutch and British Empires violently Christianised S Africa for
nearly 250 years. (the longest period it knew any religion) then your logic dictates it should have remained that way - you think Nelson Mandela should
only have been released if he had respected his Christian-apartheid captors? Do you think I, as a Saudi-born gay woman have no claim to live anywhere since I'm in a tiny minority ... should I be stateless?
You cannot hide your anti-Israel rhetoric under such a weak premise.

Do you support the two state solution, or do you believe in the elimination of Israel? I look forward to your thoughts.

Reply 81

Original post
by Zamestaneh
According to the Bible, the Jews conquered the lands from the natives after the exodus, so premising Israel on "right of return" is to mean they may return to lands that they conquered once upon a time - shoddy argument.
And the period of history under the control of any one religious group has been longer under Islam than Judaism, so on that note the Muslim Arabs of the levant/Palestine have greater claim to the area than Jews from different continents entirely.

The British have no right to "give" something that was not theirs to others who have no right to it either.

I will not get over you justifying antisemitism towards Palestinians. People with your attitude are what create those who commit terrorism.


Victim blaming. The only people responsible for terrorism are the terrorist themselves.

Reply 82

Original post
by Guru Jason
Victim blaming. The only people responsible for terrorism are the terrorist themselves.


Well said - Israel is responsible for the terrorism it has enacted and created against itself. It's nice to be on the same side for once.

Reply 83

Original post
by mirzastargirl
Quote:

" And the period of history under the control of any one religious group has been longer under Islam than Judaism, so on that from the Muslim Arabs of the levant/Palestine have greater claim to the area than Jews from different continents entirely."

I'm a Saudi Arabian gay woman. Let me ask you a simple question: If the right to exist in a particular place on earth is, as you suggest, correlated by
(cf) longest period 'under control of any one religious group ' then since the Dutch and British Empires violently Christianised S Africa for
nearly 250 years. (the longest period it knew any religion) then your logic dictates it should have remained that way - you think Nelson Mandela should
only have been released if he had respected his Christian-apartheid captors? Do you think I, as a Saudi-born gay woman have no claim to live anywhere since I'm in a tiny minority ... should I be stateless?
You cannot hide your anti-Israel rhetoric under such a weak premise.

Do you support the two state solution, or do you believe in the elimination of Israel? I look forward to your thoughts.

Key point: I specified natives to the area, not colonisers. Also, more importantly it has gone over your head that I am merely saying whichever arguments a pro-Israeli wants to use for "right of return" is actually an evidence against it from any angle. My point was not to appraise the rights of Palestinians to the land in of itself.

I am not hiding my anti-Israeli beliefs - I am openly anti-Zionist and believe it is an illegitimate state.
Though I believe a two state solution is an idealistic compromise, I no longer believe a two state solution is realistic, just as many zionists believe it is not realistic too, but I fall on the side that a pan-Arab/Islamic state which controls that land is better than an Israeli state existing.

Naturally, as a Muslim, I believe in the prophecies regarding the signs of the Hour, so the State of Israel will be defeated and crushed into the dust at some point anyway; one state, two state, no state - whatever will happen will happen.

Reply 84

Original post
by mirzastargirl
I WITH TO DRAW THIS HIGHLY OFFENSIVE REPLY BY Zamestaneh TO THE ATTENTION OF MODERATORS:

IN HIS REPLY, HE ADMITS HE DIDN'T READ MY POST, IMMEDIATELY FORGETS THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CONVERSATION AND INSTEAD

SUBSTITUTES A DISGUSTING CHILDISH & OFFENSIVE ' USED TOILET PAPER' JOKE.

As a Saudi Arabian woman and serious-minded student I'm hoping you'll moderate his sneering and deliberately offensive reply.


If you have a genuine complaint about someone's post then use the report feature, but I can tell you right now that trying to publicly weaponise the moderators and derail a debate like this is absolutely against the rules.

Reply 85

Original post
by StriderHort
If you have a genuine complaint about someone's post then use the report feature, but I can tell you right now that trying to publicly weaponise the moderators and derail a debate like this is absolutely against the rules.


She's new to the forum so probably doesn't know how this place works, bless her

Reply 86

Original post
by mirzastargirl
I WITH TO DRAW THIS HIGHLY OFFENSIVE REPLY BY Zamestaneh TO THE ATTENTION OF MODERATORS:

IN HIS REPLY, HE ADMITS HE DIDN'T READ MY POST, IMMEDIATELY FORGETS THIS IS AN IMPORTANT CONVERSATION AND INSTEAD

SUBSTITUTES A DISGUSTING CHILDISH & OFFENSIVE ' USED TOILET PAPER' JOKE.

As a Saudi Arabian woman and serious-minded student I'm hoping you'll moderate his sneering and deliberately offensive reply.


This is a forum and what you said in your post was self contradictory, so I merely addressed it :rofl:

As a British man with a 2000m Frosties swimming badge I'm hoping you'll see that it's not that deep

Reply 87

Original post
by B7861
Guys quick question, correct me if I’m wrong. But why is there so much news coverage about Israel getting attacked. But it’s been happening to Palestine for ages?

Again correct me if I’m wrong before I get attacked 😅


There is a fair amount of media coverage of Israeli attack on Palestinians, particularly recently. Read more progressive news media like the Guardian for regular updates on Israeli settler behaviour, which is often deeply aggressive and violent towards Palestinian neighbours.

News media attention to the Hamas attacks is partly due to their unexpected nature (it's been a long time since Palestinians actively attacked Israel in force) and partly down to the cruelty of their assault on families and civilians.

Reply 88

Has the SNP leader actually condemned HAMAS' attacks ? I've not seen one mention whatsoever.

Reply 89

No beheaded babies or rapes took place (this was misinformation).

As Tsun Tzu said:

"All warfare is based on deception."

"Now in order to kill the enemy, our men must be
roused to anger; that there may be advantage from defeating the enemy, they must have their rewards."

"Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting."

Innocents were still killed no doubt but details are exacerbated in war (throw back to GCSE History propaganda examples of babies on German bayonets) in order to further dehumanise the enemy or delegitimise their real grievencs, all to further isolate them.

Israel has been doing this for years with its propaganda machine to make sure crimes and terror against Israelis and Jews is overreported, and crimes and terror against Palestinians is underreported, e.g. killing journalists, Mossad harassing pro-Palestinian activists abroad, using lobby groups and weaponising party funding and connections to attack the reputation of anyone who criticises Israel by conflating anti-zionism with antisemitism, positioning itself as a free country (though it is itself an antisemitic apartheid state), bombing the only media broadcasting building in Ghaza as it was "being used by Hamas" (without proof), etc.

Shaping public perception stripping the Palestinian cause of legimacy or sympathy is a key tool in the arsenal of Israel.

Reply 90

Gaza's power plant is due to run out of power today and the Israelis aren't letting up, being stationed on the border to make sure their revenge blooms fully.

Reply 91

Original post
by Zamestaneh
No beheaded babies or rapes took place (this was misinformation).


You know this how exactly? Both may be true or not, we don't have anything approaching proven fact yet, just reported statements of IDF soldiers and local civilians. However, it's incontestable that a large scale mass murder took place. They were all killed somehow or other.

Reply 92

Original post
by mirzastargirl
I WITH TO DRAW THIS HIGHLY OFFENSIVE REPLY BY Zamestaneh TO THE ATTENTION OF MODERATORS:

Use the 'report' button to file complaints, shouting them in the thread doesn't achieve anything.

Reply 93

Original post
by Kathy89


The message is strong.

Reply 94

Original post
by Sorcerer of Old
The salty butthurt comments underneath really do make for some entertaining morning reading :lol:


Yeah some of the comments are bad to put it mildly.

Reply 95

Original post
by Zamestaneh
No beheaded babies or rapes took place (this was misinformation).

As Tsun Tzu said:

"All warfare is based on deception."

"Now in order to kill the enemy, our men must be
roused to anger; that there may be advantage from defeating the enemy, they must have their rewards."

"Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting."

Innocents were still killed no doubt but details are exacerbated in war (throw back to GCSE History propaganda examples of babies on German bayonets) in order to further dehumanise the enemy or delegitimise their real grievencs, all to further isolate them.

Israel has been doing this for years with its propaganda machine to make sure crimes and terror against Israelis and Jews is overreported, and crimes and terror against Palestinians is underreported, e.g. killing journalists, Mossad harassing pro-Palestinian activists abroad, using lobby groups and weaponising party funding and connections to attack the reputation of anyone who criticises Israel by conflating anti-zionism with antisemitism, positioning itself as a free country (though it is itself an antisemitic apartheid state), bombing the only media broadcasting building in Ghaza as it was "being used by Hamas" (without proof), etc.

Shaping public perception stripping the Palestinian cause of legimacy or sympathy is a key tool in the arsenal of Israel.


3 Hamas "militants" crossed over the border with Gaza and were intercepted by the IDF. Image shared by the IDF shows them lying on the ground with rifles after being killed by soldiers, they were posing. Turns out that an observatory satellite recorded the whole encounter, including the part where the IDF execute the "militants" while they're lying prone on the ground with their hands on their heads and no rifles in sight.

Reply 96

Original post
by mirzastargirl
Also there is an exit route to Egypt - the Palestinians are not trapped.


This is no longer true, nearby air strikes have forced Egypt to shut its border with Gaza.

Reply 97

Gaza's only power plant has now run out of fuel. If Israel continues its siege then most of Gaza's population will starve to death in the coming days. Will Israel then invade the flattened Gaza and absorb it into its own territory??

Reply 98

Original post
by Talkative Toad
Yeah some of the comments are bad to put it mildly.

Meh, looks like the OP of the tweet is unbothered and he's spitting facts tbh. Israel isn't going anywhere and that's simply the truth of the matter, and it also looks like Israel could pummel every other ME Muslim country into the dirt, that's how much stronger and superior it is. So I do think sooner or later a two state solution will have to be found.

Reply 99

Original post
by Sorcerer of Old
Meh, looks like the OP of the tweet is unbothered and he's spitting facts tbh. Israel isn't going anywhere and that's simply the truth of the matter, and it also looks like Israel could pummel every other ME Muslim country into the dirt, that's how much stronger and superior it is. So I do think sooner or later a two state solution will have to be found.


Unlikely to happen though, US foreign policy seems resolutely behind Israel and the apartheid state shows no sign of slowing down its zionist agenda.
(edited 2 years ago)

Quick Reply

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.