Just looking for a sub tbh. This is how I'm lining up.
Thats what I did last year, not with forwards but with a strong 11 and then 4.5s
Backfired hugely.. and was a stupid mistake on my part.. it allowed for no flexibilty, and no way of compensating for fixtures..
Now, I would much rather have a range of good and solid players, who I can choose from each week depending on their fixtures - rather then having an amazing 11 and no rotation..
Thats what I did last year, not with forwards but with a strong 11 and then 4.5s
Backfired hugely.. and was a stupid mistake on my part.. it allowed for no flexibilty, and no way of compensating for fixtures..
Now, I would much rather have a range of good and solid players, who I can choose from each week depending on their fixtures - rather then having an amazing 11 and no rotation..
In my team i have 2 man utd players everyone else is from a diff team. now that's what you call variety
In my team i have 2 man utd players everyone else is from a diff team. now that's what you call variety
still only new to this, but that seems like a good way to start the season, as its harder to predict which teams will do well right off the bat, then it is when the season is progressing..
still only new to this, but that seems like a good way to start the season, as its harder to predict which teams will do well right off the bat, then it is when the season is progressing..
Just looking for a sub tbh. This is how I'm lining up.]
You still need a player or two off the bench who will play. What will you do if some of those players get injured, suspended, dropped etc? E.g A lot of teams at the start of last year (including mine) had Benteke, Walcott and Silva who all got injured in the same GW. It happens.
You can get away with a non playing GK, but a non playing striker isn't a good move considering most people will have 3 who will regularly play/score.