No not the whole country. Once again, only those at risk and those in regular close contact with them.
Those for example who live with vulnerable parents or grandparents must themselves act as if they too were at risk.
So no, those people must not go out or mingle with others in society. It's really not difficult to grasp.
Those who are not remotely at risk and who do not come into regular contact with vulnerable people should have been left alone and free to live their lives normally.
Instead we locked down everybody. We locked down people who did not have Covid, we locked down people who are not a significant risk to Covid and we failed to undertake serious levels of testing to dutifully inform people whether they were asymptomatic carriers. In so doing we have meted out catastrophe, increased mental health issues, increased suicides, increased domestic abuse and violence, destroyed 1000s of jobs and livelihoods, destroyed 1000s of businesses, destroyed the economy and much more.
Lockdowns will continue to be used imo. We are seeing a lull in cases and deaths again, primarily because we've all been in lockdown again and also due to the vaccine roll-out but inevitably as we all start to go out again when the lockdowns are relaxed, the number of cases will rise again and so too the numbers of deaths. There is no short term end-point to this situation. We will be in lockdown again come Autumn imo.
It's also patently obvious that the vaccine situation is being steered towards a regular annual vaccine program just like Flu which will be immensely lucrative for Pharma who will make $trillions going forward. NHS is already gearing up for it and is also planning to give booster shots in Autumn.
https://www.ft.com/content/26b256d0-d021-46ac-ae3d-e3ea823c033dThis can only happen (or be justified) if they constantly cite new strains of the virus and say that the vaccines need constant tweaking.
Interesting isn't it how in the past, vaccines used to be very much a one-shot affair. The vaccines taught your body how to recognise and deal with a disease (like Smallpox or Polio) and that was that. Now somehow Pharma has morphed the whole business of vaccinations into something else, vaccines that seem not to teach your body once and for all but which need teaching every year . . .! Go figure !
This is why I opt to take the Natural Immunity route. For me it is always stronger and longer lasting that vaccine-derived immunity.
It's why, imo, some 20%-50% of the population already had levels of immunity to Covid before the pandemic came along. Their immunity was gained from the natural immunity acquired from past bouts of colds, Flu and ILIs and in particular the strong T-Cell immunity.
As I've stated before, I have no intention at all of become a "vaccine junkie" having to take yearly Flu shots and yearly Covid shots and all the rest and very especially not for a virus for which 80% of cases are asymptomatic, and which 99% of people survive.
Past Colds and Flu provide T-Cell Immunity
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/immune-cells-common-cold-may-recognize-sars-cov-2
Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity?https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32473127/Pre-existing and de novo humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in humanshttps://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.14.095414v2?ijkey=8fbd1e241022a88f953235bd5f1dd7b7afb5fbd4&keytype2=tf_ipsecshaPhenotype of SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndromehttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.11.20062349v2?ijkey=72f9dee829f26db0e9d1f25b2a7c7f4b61eb4827&keytype2=tf_ipsecshaSARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32668444/Pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2: the knowns and unknownshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32636479/