I'm applying for law at Cambridge (amongst other places), I've got 2 main drafts which I'm wanting to move forward with, obviously similar components, but mainly based around two of main interests in the law (the main two I've actually been exposed to) one of these is around intellectual property law, the other is human rights.
The human rights one, I think reads better. It sounds more righteous, more I want to study law at Cambridge to make a difference in the world. But I can't help but feel that's been done to death, and is very unoriginal.
The intellectual property one, I feel like it sounds less passionate. It's not that I'm not interested, its just that it's harder to sound passionate about copyright, it's not as life or death as human rights violations.
So yeah, I think that the IP one maybe stands out a little more, but is it not more important to try and show a desire to do something. They recommend mentioning what you want to do with your future career. Am I supposed to talk about my legal interests in IP for a few thousand characters then say " I wanna work at the UN~"