Was there any Collusion in the Death of Diana Princess of Wales?

I don't believe there was any collision but there is definitely something suspicious going on.

1.When anyone breaches royal security, ie someone gets into a party their not supposed to, there is a full scale inquiry announced immediately by the home office. It has taken the home office 8 years to announce a public inquiry into the death of Diana.

2. The papparatizi (apology for the spelling) following the car all saw an icredibly bright white flash. This is what I believe caused the crash, MI6 have been proved that they had planned to kill a foreign diplomat in this way by flashing a very bright light into a the eyes of a driver whilst in a tunnel

3. Diana was becoming more of a public figure than the queen and was supossedly pregnant at the time although this is dubious, but for sure she was a strong presence in the monarchy, had divorced Charles and was engaged to dodi al fayed. Who incidently is Jewish or Islamic(not sure one or the other) which wouldn't go down well with the monarchy.

4. A technique called the strawman is incredibly similiar to the circumstances of the death of Diana. This technique is used by MI5 and 6 to quash rumours of their involvement in high profile cases. After a person has been assasinated/killed the security services create a report about the killing but include several key mistakes. ie MI6 don't print in this ink or This agent was in afghanistan at the time. This report is then sold to a grieving husband/wife father etc, in this case mohammad al fayed. He buys it with out realising the flaws, MI6 cover their costs and when al fayed shows this evidence to the media, then MI6 can prove it is a fake and this immediately and permenantly discredits al fayed arguement.

5. The driver had been receiving sizeable amount of money in his 13 bank accounts around the world in the couple of months leading up to the death of Diana

6.The limousine that she was meant to be leaving in wouldn't start and therefore another limo had to be used instead, although no evidence of tampering was found after the accident, but something like a samll microchip to disable the ABS say from a radio signal could be easily hidden in the miles of wires in a car, in particular a limo.

All in all I don't believe their was a collision with another car becasue this would have left traces of paint but I do believe that a combination the powerful falsh of light and possible tampering with the vehicle caused the crash. I believe that the crash was devised by MI6 in response from concern from the royal family as to the state of Diana actions.

Also while I remember diana had previously stated that she felt her life was in danger and as she was probably the most popular person in Britain at the time and hadn't trod on any other countryies toes, that doesn't leave many people left of which some of the few are the monarchy.

please give me rep

I don't believe there was any collision...

1.When anyone breaches royal security, ie someone gets into a party their not supposed to, there is a full scale inquiry announced immediately by the home office. It has taken the home office 8 years to announce a public inquiry into the death of Diana.

3. Diana was becoming more of a public figure than the queen and was supossedly pregnant at the time although this is dubious, but for sure she was a strong presence in the monarchy, had divorced Charles and was engaged to dodi al fayed. Who incidently is Jewish or Islamic(not sure one or the other) which wouldn't go down well with the monarchy.

4. A technique called the strawman is incredibly similiar to the circumstances of the death of Diana. This technique is used by MI5 and 6 to quash rumours of their involvement in high profile cases. After a person has been assasinated/killed the security services create a report about the killing but include several key mistakes. ie MI6 don't print in this ink or This agent was in afghanistan at the time. This report is then sold to a grieving husband/wife father etc, in this case mohammad al fayed. He buys it with out realising the flaws, MI6 cover their costs and when al fayed shows this evidence to the media, then MI6 can prove it is a fake and this immediately and permenantly discredits al fayed arguement.

6.The limousine that she was meant to be leaving in wouldn't start and therefore another limo had to be used instead, although no evidence of tampering was found after the accident, but something like a samll microchip to disable the ABS say from a radio signal could be easily hidden in the miles of wires in a car, in particular a limo.

please give me rep

When anyone breaches royal security...

nice post, but read thread title again...


you got the wrong vowel mate

I have no interest whatsoever in whether that silly cow was murdered, but I'll admit to being curious about how her bodyguard has become a hero and fellow victim in this weird story.

Wasn't he responsible for her safety?
Didn't that demand that he tell the driver to slow down?
Don't these guys always insist their charges wear seatbelts?
Didn't he **** up?

She wasn't a royal anymore, and those inquiries are intended to stop the same happening again. Unfortunately, no preventative measure can now made as a result of an inquiry.

ABS in the new limo? Why not just tamper with the first limo. It would be just as easy to gain access to either limo.

3. Diana was becoming more of a public figure than the queen and was supossedly pregnant at the time although this is dubious, but for sure she was a strong presence in the monarchy, had divorced Charles and was engaged to dodi al fayed. Who incidently is Jewish or Islamic(not sure one or the other) which wouldn't go down well with the monarchy.

Her title was the Her Royal Highness Princess Diana of Wales, she refused to give up the title when they were divoreced, which also upset the monarchy.

Her title after the divorce, as per the letters patent defining entitlement to the title HRH, was Diana, Princess of Wales.

The letters patent defining entitlement to the HRH date from 1917, more than 40 years before Diana was even born, let alone divorced.

I've tried and failed to find them in full form on the net. The best I can recommend is the notice of them issued in the Gazette of 14th December 1917. The actual letters patent date from the 30th November that year.

They in fact make no reference to divorces. Diana however was a Princess by marriage, not birth. Ergo, the end of the marriage ended her entitlement to the honorific. She's became Diana, Princess of Wales in the same way that a divorced peeress would retain the title after her name without actually being a peeress.