All Science/Maths/Engineering courses at Kings suck. Almost a quarter of Kings students are on one of these courses hence its reputation being poor compared to UCL/ICL. Kings is also ugly (Strand campus is anyway)
Yet more and more Oxbridge students find themselves without jobs after graduation, maby because these students like yourslef think that reputation is everything and therefore do nothing else but work to get into and then get a degree from Oxbridge. Like I said before a uni's reputation isn't everything. If all you are good for is work and therefore don't have any social attributes etc then an employer is going to be less likely to offer you a job than say someone from Kings who is fairly smart but also have great social attributes such as TEAM working skills etc.
Substantiate this. Show me some links, or else I shall dismiss this statement for lack of evidence.
ooo thats a point the tables, haha 1.oxford 2. cambridge 3. imperial . . . . . somewhere between 15-25: kings
Yes...because all intelligent immediately look to the league tables to back up their arguments .
I seem to remember Oxford being 15th or something for Economics in the Times league table last year. I don't think even someone as head-slappingly dim as yourself needs to be told my point in bringing that up...
haha a BTEC is a joke, do you honestly belive all this equivelent lark is for real, its designed to boost your self esteem and keep the kids of the streets, the line is GCSE - A LEVEL (or IB) why do you think oxbridge only accept A level or IB people, no BTEC no GNVQ no "equivelents"
You do realise that Imperial College (the Mathematics and Computer Science departments, at least) accepts the BTEC, don't you?
BTEC in computer science is just as good as three a-levels and will prepare alot better for a BSc Comp Sci course, in fact college in general woudl prepare you btter as your out of the school kiddy environment.