The Student Room Group

Why are so many young people/students socialist or communist?

Scroll to see replies

Original post by jismith1989
That's like saying if you're strong, patriotic and courageous, why aren't you fighting in Afghanistan? It's an utter non sequitur.


No it isn't. Think about it logically, if you're intelligent, you'll know how to avoid getting pregnant early and you'll want to avoid it because you'll want to do a decent job and give your kids a good life when you're financially stable...
Original post by Kibalchich
The irony of a 25 year old kid saying all this hasn't gone unnoticed. :biggrin:


25 and kid. ?
Don't really go together.
anyway I'm also from the that's THE poorest housing estate in europe .
I find work but sit back and watch while immigrants, young teen trampy mothers and junkies get everything.you don't need to be older than twenty five to realise that's WRONG.

WRONG, UNJUST,IMMORAL,
Original post by LipstickKisses
Actually IQ isn't an accurate measure of intelligence. I didn't say all poor people were stupid, just that if you're intelligent, well, why are you pregnant at 16 without 5 GCSEs at A-C? :eyeball:


Accident? Drunken mistake? I went to a grammar and every year there were a couple of ostensibly clever, sensible girls who got pregnant.



Because people can't be arsed to get off their arses and do it for themselves, they want someone else to.


Any empirical evidence for this? The majority of people who receive benefits/live in poverty are actually employed, you know. It's easy for someone from a well off background, who's received a lot of advantages, to say "life is what you make of it" - show some awareness that other people aren't as fortunate as you.
Original post by Gremlins
Accident? Drunken mistake? I went to a grammar and every year there were a couple of ostensibly clever, sensible girls who got pregnant.

I accept that, but if that were the case, we would have far less teen pregnancy than we have now.




Any empirical evidence for this? The majority of people who receive benefits/live in poverty are actually employed, you know. It's easy for someone from a well off background, who's received a lot of advantages, to say "life is what you make of it" - show some awareness that other people aren't as fortunate as you.

Life is what you make it though. You can sit at home whining about life being unfair, or you can get out there, give it your best and make it. I have no sympathy for those who don't try.
Reply 184
All this talk of how people come down to earth and become right wing as they mature is ridiculous.

Even if reality is right wing, then with lots of people voting left wing, reality can change. Surely it would be immature to just accept a society you think is morally flawed? Basically, it's silly saying people become aware of reality and become tory, as if they continued to support the system they believe to be right then they'd be playing a part in changing society to the way they feel it should be. Are you people saying they should just sit back and accept the flaws in the system?

I think the reason so many young students are left-wing is because they, as students, feel academic merit should be more important than background, and fight for this justice.
Original post by LipstickKisses
I accept that, but if that were the case, we would have far less teen pregnancy than we have now.


For every 1,000 girls between 15 and 17 there are around 40 pregancies.


Life is what you make it though.


Repeating something doesn't make it true.

You can sit at home whining about life being unfair, or you can get out there, give it your best and make it. I have no sympathy for those who don't try.


And now you've shifted to goal posts to "trying". It is of course a fallacy to claim that everyone who tries, succeeds because it's patently not true. You or someone you know must have given their all to something and not got what they wanted.
Original post by Gremlins
For every 1,000 girls between 15 and 17 there are around 40 pregancies.
And what about under 15s? It exists.



Repeating something doesn't make it true.

Screaming about inequality doesn't make you richer.

And now you've shifted to goal posts to "trying". It is of course a fallacy to claim that everyone who tries, succeeds because it's patently not true. You or someone you know must have given their all to something and not got what they wanted.


Of course, so you try again. You don't give up. You keep at it, and if you want it badly enough, you can do it. It might not be easy, it might not be immidiate, but it is certainly possible.
Original post by LipstickKisses
And what about under 15s? It exists.


7.8 per 1000 in girls 13-15.


Screaming about inequality doesn't make you richer.


I hope that was supposed to be a non-sequitur.


Of course, so you try again. You don't give up. You keep at it, and if you want it badly enough, you can do it. It might not be easy, it might not be immidiate, but it is certainly possible.


Logically impossible. If (e.g.) 100,000 people desperately want to be a football player for Arsenal it's simply not possible. Try to apply some logic to this situation.
Original post by Gremlins
7.8 per 1000 in girls 13-15.


Together with the other number, it's still too high.




Logically impossible. If (e.g.) 100,000 people desperately want to be a football player for Arsenal it's simply not possible. Try to apply some logic to this situation.


And if it fails, you try something else. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Using your logic, you try and fail to be a football player for arsenal, so you decide you would have more of a chance being a football player for a different team. It's called common sense
Original post by Gremlins

Logically impossible. If (e.g.) 100,000 people desperately want to be a football player for Arsenal it's simply not possible. Try to apply some logic to this situation.


Perhaps if they had more realistic ambitions then they would be able to pay to support their child instead of dreaming of being a celebrity, whilst claiming benefits.
Original post by LipstickKisses
Together with the other number, it's still too high.


It roughly equals about 2.4% of teenage girls getting pregnant (of whom about 50% have an abortion). That means about 1.2% of teenage girls become mothers. This is not a colossally high number.




And if it fails, you try something else. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Using your logic, you try and fail to be a football player for arsenal, so you decide you would have more of a chance being a football player for a different team. It's called common sense


So we agree that you can't achieve anything you want - life is not in fact "what you make of it" but is also greatly influenced by other people. Nice to see we agree. Does that mean we can agree that for a great deal of people who are on benefits (the majority of whom *do* work, btw) are not in fact people who are lazy and "haven't got off their arses and done it for themselves" but rather may have had their circumstances influenced by the people around them? :smile:
Original post by Gremlins
It roughly equals about 2.4% of teenage girls getting pregnant (of whom about 50% have an abortion). That means about 1.2% of teenage girls become mothers. This is not a colossally high number.

Still too high in my opinion, because 1.2% of the UK population is a lot of people/





So we agree that you can't achieve anything you want - life is not in fact "what you make of it" but is also greatly influenced by other people. Nice to see we agree. Does that mean we can agree that for a great deal of people who are on benefits (the majority of whom *do* work, btw) are not in fact people who are lazy and "haven't got off their arses and done it for themselves" but rather may have had their circumstances influenced by the people around them? :smile:


No, we do not agree. I believe those who did not make it did not want it enough.
Original post by PendulumBoB
Perhaps if they had more realistic ambitions then they would be able to pay to support their child instead of dreaming of being a celebrity, whilst claiming benefits.


Derp? It was an allegorical example to counter lipstickkisses' argument that you could just "get out there" and achieve what you want. This is of course not true. I hope you too are aware that the majority of people claiming benefits do actually work, right?
Original post by LipstickKisses
No, we do not agree. I believe those who did not make it did not want it enough.



But you've just argued that people should change what they want if they can't achieve something they may have really wanted! You're impossible to have any kind of discussion with.
Original post by Gremlins
But you've just argued that people should change what they want if they can't achieve something they may have really wanted! You're impossible to have any kind of discussion with.


If someone cannot do it, they do not want it, as when there's a will there is a way. If they still wanted to do it, they could work for a smaller club and get noticed then get a transfer instead of starting there. If you want it badly enough, eventually you will do it.
Original post by Kibalchich
You can back that figure of 99% up with a research paper I take it.


Only dorks and dweebs cite research papers on an internet forum. How about getting out of your bedroom for a change and look around you?:smile:
Original post by Gremlins
Any empirical evidence for this? The majority of people who receive benefits/live in poverty are actually employed, you know. It's easy for someone from a well off background, who's received a lot of advantages, to say "life is what you make of it" - show some awareness that other people aren't as fortunate as you.


Two things:

-I think we have VERY different definitions of "poverty".

-Any empirical evidence for that statement?
Original post by Stephen857
25 and kid. ?
Don't really go together.
anyway I'm also from the that's THE poorest housing estate in europe .
I find work but sit back and watch while immigrants, young teen trampy mothers and junkies get everything.you don't need to be older than twenty five to realise that's WRONG.

WRONG, UNJUST,IMMORAL,


Too right pal.

One day this guy will know what it's like to work a 40 hour week, get your pay cheque, see a monster amount of it taken off through tax and walk outside and see some waster who has no intention of ever working and their kid named D'Shakweekweeshia strolling into their flat in their £110 Nikes.


Repeat for a number of years.

The amount of young socialists I've seen over the years from school/6th form/uni who then graduate, put on a tie and get a job in a bank or somewhere tells me everything.

Out of all of them I know just one guy who is the exception. He is the only one who deserves respect. They all grow up and sell out in the end. Matey boy will too.
Reply 198
Original post by Gremlins
Derp? It was an allegorical example to counter lipstickkisses' argument that you could just "get out there" and achieve what you want. This is of course not true. I hope you too are aware that the majority of people claiming benefits do actually work, right?


Well maybe they should've gone to university or worked harder ;/ they're the kind of idiots who were annoying and didn't listen in school, it's not my fault some of us actually work hard to get where we are.
Original post by LipstickKisses
If someone cannot do it, they do not want it, as when there's a will there is a way. If they still wanted to do it, they could work for a smaller club and get noticed then get a transfer instead of starting there. If you want it badly enough, eventually you will do it.


So anyone can do what they want, and if they can't do it they don't want it enough? That's a classical circular argument.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending