I don't understand this quote. Can anyone help me understand it?
I have no idea what exactly this quote is trying to say. To give it some context, i'm doing an essay on realism and the different ways that its used in City of God. I hope someone out there can help.
Cinematic realism is viewed as a discourse coded for transparency such that the indexicality of photo-graphic realism is replaced by a view of the “reality-effect” produced by codes and discourse.
Cinematic realism is viewed as a discourse coded for transparency such that the indexicality of photo-graphic realism is replaced by a view of the “reality-effect” produced by codes and discourse.
Haha, postmodern bollox at its finest.
http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html
It's meaningless. Unless the writer wants to rewrite this in an intelligible way, they are being deliberately unhelpful.
Is this a real example: is there a source?
http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html
It's meaningless. Unless the writer wants to rewrite this in an intelligible way, they are being deliberately unhelpful.
Is this a real example: is there a source?
Original post by Matt00606
I have no idea what exactly this quote is trying to say. To give it some context, i'm doing an essay on realism and the different ways that its used in City of God. I hope someone out there can help.
Cinematic realism is viewed as a discourse coded for transparency such that the indexicality of photo-graphic realism is replaced by a view of the “reality-effect” produced by codes and discourse.
Cinematic realism is viewed as a discourse coded for transparency such that the indexicality of photo-graphic realism is replaced by a view of the “reality-effect” produced by codes and discourse.
Bin the writer
Original post by chazwomaq
Is this a real example: is there a source?
https://vdocuments.net/true-lies-stephen-prince.html
Edit: JSTOR link instead http://www.jstor.org/stable/1213468
Spoiler
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by chazwomaq
Haha, postmodern bollox at its finest.
http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html
It's meaningless. Unless the writer wants to rewrite this in an intelligible way, they are being deliberately unhelpful.
Is this a real example: is there a source?
http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html
It's meaningless. Unless the writer wants to rewrite this in an intelligible way, they are being deliberately unhelpful.
Is this a real example: is there a source?
Yeah there is a source its the University of California Press. And yeah I think they are just being deliberately unhelpful.
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- GCSE Exam Discussions 2024
- How many quotes? Eng Lit GCSE
- Essay help - CIE IGCSE English Literature
- last minute yr 10 mock revision HELP!!
- BOOSTING GRADES for GCSEs
- Grade 9 in english literature??
- I have a feeling that my computer science grade will be very low.
- AQA A Level computer science Skeleton code 2024
- Poetry - love and relationships
- Advice for note taking a-level English literature?
- OCR A-Level English Literature
- SQA Higher Exam Advice - Subject Specific
- GCSEs
- Welsh Baccalaureate individual investigation essay
- Help im in year 13 lol
- how to get better at writing sociology/religious studies essays?
- When should I start revising for gcse?
- Assignments help
- what r ur honest gcse opinions :)
- focusing for alevels - english lit especially
Latest
Trending
Last reply 4 weeks ago
media studies gcse (eduqas) - help needed on a questionTrending
Last reply 4 weeks ago
media studies gcse (eduqas) - help needed on a question
