The Student Room Group

Typing in exams

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Sabertooth
The common denominator here is you. It's your responsibility.


I would actually be ok with that

you sound ignorant again, i tried to improve it but i cant, like i said some people genuinely cant help how they write no matter how many times they try, you clearly do not understand because you havent experienced that issue
Original post by succubus666
you sound ignorant again, i tried to improve it but i cant, like i said some people genuinely cant help how they write no matter how many times they try, you clearly do not understand because you havent experienced that issue

Au contraire, I had terrible writing and when I was about 15 I did worksheets where I had to write out each letter hundreds of times then worked on joining them. My writing is still not awesome but I made a hell of an improvement. It's simply laziness to not work on it and expect people to make allowances for something that is entirely within the person's control.
Original post by Sabertooth
Au contraire, I had terrible writing and when I was about 15 I did worksheets where I had to write out each letter hundreds of times then worked on joining them. My writing is still not awesome but I made a hell of an improvement. It's simply laziness to not work on it and expect people to make allowances for something that is entirely within the person's control.

ok good for you do you want a medal or something? just because YOU have made an improvement dont expect other people to go through the same experiences as you. its not laziness i wish i had neat handwriting but i just cant no matter what i always fall back to my original state.
Original post by succubus666
ok good for you do you want a medal or something? just because YOU have made an improvement dont expect other people to go through the same experiences as you. its not laziness i wish i had neat handwriting but i just cant no matter what i always fall back to my original state.

Ok so first I'm ignorant because I don't know what these lazy people go through, now I'm showing off by saying how I have my own experience. :woo:
Original post by Sabertooth
Ok so first I'm ignorant because I don't know what these lazy people go through, now I'm showing off by saying how I have my own experience. :woo:

i didnt even say youre showing off lol but good for you :smile: all i said was do you want a medal, i can give you one
(edited 2 years ago)
Some people's hands may also fatigue faster than others
Original post by The RAR
Then I propose everyone should be able to type


This would probably make things harder for a lot of students who aren't touch typists and wouldn't necessarily be better for those with fine motor disabilities, depending on the nature of their disability.

Also since people tend to develop typing abilities through usage this ends up disadvantaging those without computer access at home, who tend to also be in less privileged socioeconomic groups. So it might even widen the gap between some groups of students...

The theoretically ideal solution would be to provide scribes for all students but that would obviously be impossible though.
(edited 2 years ago)
Original post by succubus666
i didnt even say youre showing off lol but good for you :smile: all i said was do you want a medal, i can give you one

People generally ask if others want a medal when they assume they're showing off.
Reply 28
Original post by artful_lounger
The theoretically ideal solution would be to provide scribes for all students but that would obviously be impossible though.

People unused to having a scribe (e.g. getting one because they've just broken their arm) find them a real encumbrance as they aren't used to dictating their thoughts and struggle to structure decent sentences. Trying to dictate Maths is even worse and often they have to scrawl illegibly whilst talking in order to get their thoughts to flow as normal.
You start learning to write at 5 years old, give or take a year. If after 13 years of practice at age 17/18 it's still not legible, either you have been extremely undisciplined or you have fine motor skill problems. In either of these cases the problem should have been addressed before year 13.If it's the latter then typing in exams should be allowed.
(edited 2 years ago)
the way some of you assume that people should have neat handwriting without a disability is strange
Pretty sure when I was at school not being able to competently write was basically seen the same as not being able to read. Unless you have a genuine disability then 'not being able to write legibly' simply wasn't an option and you would eventually be disciplined. Hell, the generation before me would have their hands belted for it.

As for stuff like hands hurting/fatigue?.. This is largely down to practice and taking responsibility. If you had a big sports day coming up you'd be expected to practice and stretch, why should an exam be different?
(edited 2 years ago)
Original post by succubus666
jeez i think you need to work on your ignorance :nyan:


Ignorant from having had direct personal experience?

Sorry for not believing everyone should make allowances for me because I'm too lazy to work on a changeable aspect of myself. :dunce:
Original post by StriderHort
Pretty sure when I was at school not being able to competently write was basically seen the same as not being able to read. Unless you have a genuine disability then 'not being able to write legibly' simply wasn't an option and you would eventually be disciplined. Hell, the generation before me would have their hands belted for it.

As for stuff like hands hurting/fatigue?.. This is largely down to practice and taking responsibility. If you had a big sports day c

Absolutely.
Reply 34
Original post by Nobody2u
You start learning to write at 5 years old, give or take a year. If after 13 years of practice at age 17/18 it's still not legible, either you have been extremely undisciplined or you have fine motor skill problems. In either of these cases the problem should have been addressed before year 13.If it's the latter then typing in exams should be allowed.

Lol, it's really not that deep. My handwriting is legible 99% of the time. When you're writing essays upon essays under time pressure, one can start to become sloppy/rushed when trying to put ideas onto paper.
Original post by Sabertooth
Ignorant from having had direct personal experience?

Sorry for not believing everyone should make allowances for me because I'm too lazy to work on a changeable aspect of myself. :dunce:

ok like i said great that you have changed your handwriting but dont expect other people to undergo the same experiences then call them lazy for not doing so
Original post by succubus666
ok like i said great that you have changed your handwriting but dont expect other people to undergo the same experiences then call them lazy for not doing so

Why not?
Original post by EOData
People unused to having a scribe (e.g. getting one because they've just broken their arm) find them a real encumbrance as they aren't used to dictating their thoughts and struggle to structure decent sentences. Trying to dictate Maths is even worse and often they have to scrawl illegibly whilst talking in order to get their thoughts to flow as normal.


That's a fair point also - I can imagine trying to dictate any maths beyond arithmetic could be a pain, especially if the scribe isn't familiar with the maths in question!

Original post by succubus666
the way some of you assume that people should have neat handwriting without a disability is strange


There is a pretty wide gap between "neat" and "legible". The latter I think is a pretty reasonable assumption and quite within most people's grasp. I agree that "neat" handwriting is both unnecessary and takes far more time to develop (or to use) than is practical for most people, but one doesn't need to reach that for to have handwriting that is legible.

That said I think a lot of this is based on the assumption of the OP that their handwriting is or will be illegible to examiners, which I think is probably unlikely - a significant part of their job is reading students' handwriting for things written under pressure of time, so I imagine most are reasonably good at it. Also, I think exam boards have special teams of examiners who specialise in reading hard to read/illegible scripts (I think @Reality Check mentioned this as a thing at some point?).
(edited 2 years ago)
Original post by Sabertooth
Why not?

some people just cant change the way they write, theres this boy in my class he has no disability but his handwriting is terrible even though he tries to improve it, it doesnt work thus he uses a computer. sometimes it just doesnt work for everyone, for instance i tried to improve my handwriting in primary but it didnt work
Reply 39
Original post by Sabertooth
Typing is faster and it is unfair to give that advantage to people who are too lazy to work on their handwriting.


How does being efficient mean laziness?

Quick Reply

Latest