Scroll to see replies

Original post by EesaImran

thought it was a bit harder than previous years - might just be me tho. Geometry was quite tough I thought.

yes id agree i feel like the first question needing a full proof to go with the answer made it take so much longer

Original post by libgensym

yes id agree i feel like the first question needing a full proof to go with the answer made it take so much longer

My classmates and I found the questions are easier this year. We both are year 9 students.

I did all 6, my friend completed 4.

(edited 3 weeks ago)

Original post by libgensym

how did everyone find it

My friend and I found the questions are easier. We are year 9 students

Original post by Juni2704

My classmates and I found the questions are easier this year. We both are year 9 students

yh i think it varies from person to person, i struggle with geometry and combinatoric sort of questions so found this year harder

Original post by Juni2704

My friend and I found the questions are easier. We are year 9 students

how many questions did u attempt?

Original post by EesaImran

how many questions did u attempt?

I did all 6, my friend completed 4.

Original post by libgensym

how did everyone find it

My son year 10 found it harder this year . He got a distinction last year (29 from 3 questions answered) . His qualification score this year was 117. I think it all depends on where your strengths lie some will find harder some easier but difficult to judge until the scores are out.

Question: For Q4, if half of my proof was based on an assertation that was wrong, but I end up obtaining one of the 2 possible values for n, how many marks would I lose?

Another question: How would the markers mark Q5, the answer is quite easy to obtain (250) but how rigorous does your proof need to be?

Another question: For Q2, is it enough to show that if 2 numbers in the sequence differed by k, then the next number will never be consecutive unless k is 1?

Another question: For Q1, if I didn't get an answer, but I noticed the fact that if you shift one of the letters to the left, all the letters that have been passed by that letter can't move (e.g. OLYMSPIAD, S is shifted to the left so PIAD cannot move), how many marks would I get for that?

Sorry for dumping these questions on you guys, but as I said, this is the first BMO I have ever done. I did do the hamilton last year, but I'm not sure if they mark it in the same way. I would also appreciate it if someone explained to me how BMO1 is marked.

Another question: How would the markers mark Q5, the answer is quite easy to obtain (250) but how rigorous does your proof need to be?

Another question: For Q2, is it enough to show that if 2 numbers in the sequence differed by k, then the next number will never be consecutive unless k is 1?

Another question: For Q1, if I didn't get an answer, but I noticed the fact that if you shift one of the letters to the left, all the letters that have been passed by that letter can't move (e.g. OLYMSPIAD, S is shifted to the left so PIAD cannot move), how many marks would I get for that?

Sorry for dumping these questions on you guys, but as I said, this is the first BMO I have ever done. I did do the hamilton last year, but I'm not sure if they mark it in the same way. I would also appreciate it if someone explained to me how BMO1 is marked.

(edited 3 weeks ago)

Original post by kmannnn

Question: For Q4, if half of my proof was based on an assertation that was wrong, but I end up obtaining one of the 2 possible values for n, how many marks would I lose?

Another question: How would the markers mark Q5, the answer is quite easy to obtain (250) but how rigorous does your proof need to be?

Another question: For Q2, is it enough to show that if 2 numbers in the sequence differed by k, then the next number will never be consecutive unless k is 1?

Another question: For Q1, if I didn't get an answer, but I noticed the fact that if you shift one of the letters to the left, all the letters that have been passed by that letter can't move (e.g. OLYMSPIAD, S is shifted to the left so PIAD cannot move), how many marks would I get for that?

Sorry for dumping these questions on you guys, but as I said, this is the first BMO I have ever done. I did do the hamilton last year, but I'm not sure if they mark it in the same way. I would also appreciate it if someone explained to me how BMO1 is marked.

Another question: How would the markers mark Q5, the answer is quite easy to obtain (250) but how rigorous does your proof need to be?

Another question: For Q2, is it enough to show that if 2 numbers in the sequence differed by k, then the next number will never be consecutive unless k is 1?

Another question: For Q1, if I didn't get an answer, but I noticed the fact that if you shift one of the letters to the left, all the letters that have been passed by that letter can't move (e.g. OLYMSPIAD, S is shifted to the left so PIAD cannot move), how many marks would I get for that?

Sorry for dumping these questions on you guys, but as I said, this is the first BMO I have ever done. I did do the hamilton last year, but I'm not sure if they mark it in the same way. I would also appreciate it if someone explained to me how BMO1 is marked.

For marking - They use a 0+ 10- mark-scheme, This is the 2022 (round 1) report's description of how they mark:

"What we are looking for are full solutions to problems. This involves identifying a suitable strategy, explaining why your strategy solves the problem, and then carrying it out to produce an answer or prove the required result. In marking each question, we look at the solution synoptically and decide whether the candidate has a viable overall strategy or not. An answer which is essentially a solution will be awarded near maximum credit, with marks deducted for errors of calculation, flaws in logic, omission of cases or technical faults. On the other hand, an answer which does not present a complete argument is marked on a ‘0 plus’ basis; up to 4 marks might be awarded for particular cases or insights."

So I'd guess you will have got 2-4 marks for q1.

For question 5, to get full or near full marks you'll need to prove 250 flaws can be achieved, and that it is the smallest amount obtainable.

I dunno about your answer to question 2, I used strong induction for my proof. They look at differences in the video solutions, so you've got that going for you.

Original post by dan3214

For marking - They use a 0+ 10- mark-scheme, This is the 2022 (round 1) report's description of how they mark:

"What we are looking for are full solutions to problems. This involves identifying a suitable strategy, explaining why your strategy solves the problem, and then carrying it out to produce an answer or prove the required result. In marking each question, we look at the solution synoptically and decide whether the candidate has a viable overall strategy or not. An answer which is essentially a solution will be awarded near maximum credit, with marks deducted for errors of calculation, flaws in logic, omission of cases or technical faults. On the other hand, an answer which does not present a complete argument is marked on a ‘0 plus’ basis; up to 4 marks might be awarded for particular cases or insights."

So I'd guess you will have got 2-4 marks for q1.

For question 5, to get full or near full marks you'll need to prove 250 flaws can be achieved, and that it is the smallest amount obtainable.

I dunno about your answer to question 2, I used strong induction for my proof. They look at differences in the video solutions, so you've got that going for you.

"What we are looking for are full solutions to problems. This involves identifying a suitable strategy, explaining why your strategy solves the problem, and then carrying it out to produce an answer or prove the required result. In marking each question, we look at the solution synoptically and decide whether the candidate has a viable overall strategy or not. An answer which is essentially a solution will be awarded near maximum credit, with marks deducted for errors of calculation, flaws in logic, omission of cases or technical faults. On the other hand, an answer which does not present a complete argument is marked on a ‘0 plus’ basis; up to 4 marks might be awarded for particular cases or insights."

So I'd guess you will have got 2-4 marks for q1.

For question 5, to get full or near full marks you'll need to prove 250 flaws can be achieved, and that it is the smallest amount obtainable.

I dunno about your answer to question 2, I used strong induction for my proof. They look at differences in the video solutions, so you've got that going for you.

Thanks, that was very helpful.

Could you answer my question about Q4 and half of my proof being wrong? Would I receive a 0+ mark or a 10- mark?

Original post by kmannnn

Thanks, that was very helpful.

Could you answer my question about Q4 and half of my proof being wrong? Would I receive a 0+ mark or a 10- mark?

Could you answer my question about Q4 and half of my proof being wrong? Would I receive a 0+ mark or a 10- mark?

I think it depends on how rigorous and well-reasoned the rest of your answer is. Also the reason why you didn't get both answers for n will mean alot I imagine, if you didnt get them because your method and reasoning was ultimately flawed then it'll be a 0+, but if you had a solid method which should have worked if not for maybe a wrong assumption or mistake or two then I imagine it'll be 10-. Just my thoughts though its my first bmo too. I really hope the boundaries are quite generous this year.

Original post by dan3214

I think it depends on how rigorous and well-reasoned the rest of your answer is. Also the reason why you didn't get both answers for n will mean alot I imagine, if you didnt get them because your method and reasoning was ultimately flawed then it'll be a 0+, but if you had a solid method which should have worked if not for maybe a wrong assumption or mistake or two then I imagine it'll be 10-. Just my thoughts though its my first bmo too. I really hope the boundaries are quite generous this year.

Yeah,

What I did was notice that n2^n + 1 has to be an odd square, not an even square, so n2^n + 1 = (2k+1)^2

Minus 1 from both sides, then completing the square yields the equation: n2^n = 2k(2k+2)

Divide by 4: n2^(n-2) = k^2 + k

Rearrange to get k^2 + k - n2^(n-2) = 0

What I should have done is notice that n2^(n-2) can only be 2 or 6 for k to be an integer, so n can be 2 or 3. This is because the quadratic is only factorizable if n2^(n-2) is 2 or 6.

Instead what I did was complete the square and find k in terms of n, from which I was able to find 1 possible value for n (3).

Original post by dan3214

I think it depends on how rigorous and well-reasoned the rest of your answer is. Also the reason why you didn't get both answers for n will mean alot I imagine, if you didnt get them because your method and reasoning was ultimately flawed then it'll be a 0+, but if you had a solid method which should have worked if not for maybe a wrong assumption or mistake or two then I imagine it'll be 10-. Just my thoughts though its my first bmo too. I really hope the boundaries are quite generous this year.

Yeah same, I hope the grade boundary for distinction is a bit lower than usual (high 10s/low 20s).

Original post by Juni2704

I've heard from some acquaintances that they felt questions this year seem much easier. It appears that the grade boundaries may be quite high this year.

I think you can argue both ways. Question 1, supposedly being the most accessible, needed an actual proof which makes it harder, however Q2 and Q5 were surprisingly easy. Also, in my opinion, last year's paper was easier so the grade boundaries might go down.

(edited 2 weeks ago)

Original post by kmannnn

I think you can argue both ways. Question 1, supposedly being the most accessible, needed an actual proof which makes it harder, however Q2 and Q5 were surprisingly easy. Also, in my opinion, last year's paper was easier so the grade boundaries might go down.

Interesting analysis. A considerable number of school students did not perform well in SMC this year, and only a few progressed to the BMO1 round. There was an anticipation that the BMO1 boundary would be lower than the previous year, but it turned out not to be the case. So, let’s see what will happen to the BMO1 results.

I’ve heard that kids from specific countries directly enter the BMO1 without taking the SMC. This could potentially screw up the BMO1 results.

(edited 2 weeks ago)

Hungary camp invitation sent out last Thursday.

- Problem solving the smc 2023
- Bmo1 2022
- Senior Maths Challenge 2023
- Bmo2 2022
- UKMT Maclaurin Olympiad 2022: Maths
- Student Finance specific to the open university
- Student finance
- Can I choose which year is considered for maintenance loan?
- Student finance
- KCL Accommodation replacement
- Garden Halls 2023/24 Contract Takeover
- Stratford One, Unite Students Building Tenancy takeover (1 Month free)
- Question re: Suspension
- SAAS
- sudden change in parental income not reflected on sfe forms
- University Application - Cambridge, Imperial, UCL, Manchester, Eidngurgh
- Maths contest practice
- Maintenance loan question - please HELP
- Regarding the BMOs
- Accommodation

- Deutsche Bank 2024 Graduate
- Lloyds Banking Group 2024 Graduate Scheme
- Sky graduate programme 2024
- Bmo 2023/24
- santander graduate 2023
- Shell Graduate Scheme 2024
- Airbus Global Graduate Programme 2023 (for 2024 entry)
- NHS Graduate Management Training Scheme 2024 start
- Scientist Training Programme 2024 Applicants
- BDO grad scheme 2024
- AstraZeneca Graduate Schemes UK 2024
- 2024 HSBC graduate scheme
- BP graduate scheme 2024
- Accenture 2023-2024 grad scheme
- Think ahead 2023/2024
- Barclays Graduate Scheme 2024
- Airbus Graduate Programme 2024
- Frontline Social Work 2024
- PwC Audit 2024 Programme
- HSBC Strategy and Transformation Graduate Programme 2024

- Nottingham university medicine MMI
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 45)
- I want to teach EFL in tertiary edu institutions. Is Trinity CertTESOL sufficient?
- EY experience day tips
- Oxford College hurt/heal
- Sending mail to UCL
- do you have to reference images in powerpoint?
- Nursing with Leadership at Leicester Uni
- The Fast Food Restaurants Hurt/Heal game
- Got mock grades - Triple or Combined Science

- World cuisines hurt/heal game
- Breakfast items hurt/heal game!
- Have you recently joined TSR? Say hello!
- The County Hurt / Heal Game
- Ultrasound soon
- The honorable non-russell group hurt/heal game
- The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5)
- Retaking
- The Cambridge College Hurt/Heal Game [part 2]
- How To Celebrate Christmas If You’re A Student Not Heading Home

- Supermarket Hurt/Heal Game
- The Forum Games Hurt/Heal Game
- The Sports Hurt/heal game
- maths in chemistry
- MPhil Politics and International Studies 2024
- British food hurt/heal game!
- Cannot click "Submit application" button in "MyImperial" postgraduate portal
- How is the teaching at Oxford University?
- HKU / CUHK Medicine non-jupas 2024
- University for Psychology

- Why is this security guard like this?
- 57% AI generated score
- Cattolica del Sacro Cuore for medicine - English. Any recommendation or feedback
- Uni assignment
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- UKWPMED Applicants
- How important is attendance when applying to university?
- University of Oxford - Applications - Would I be considered?
- 2023 Lloyd's of London Insurance Graduate Scheme
- Scared of failing uni

- Nottingham university medicine MMI
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 45)
- I want to teach EFL in tertiary edu institutions. Is Trinity CertTESOL sufficient?
- EY experience day tips
- Oxford College hurt/heal
- Sending mail to UCL
- do you have to reference images in powerpoint?
- Nursing with Leadership at Leicester Uni
- The Fast Food Restaurants Hurt/Heal game
- Got mock grades - Triple or Combined Science

- World cuisines hurt/heal game
- Breakfast items hurt/heal game!
- Have you recently joined TSR? Say hello!
- The County Hurt / Heal Game
- Ultrasound soon
- The honorable non-russell group hurt/heal game
- The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5)
- Retaking
- The Cambridge College Hurt/Heal Game [part 2]
- How To Celebrate Christmas If You’re A Student Not Heading Home

- Supermarket Hurt/Heal Game
- The Forum Games Hurt/Heal Game
- The Sports Hurt/heal game
- maths in chemistry
- MPhil Politics and International Studies 2024
- British food hurt/heal game!
- Cannot click "Submit application" button in "MyImperial" postgraduate portal
- How is the teaching at Oxford University?
- HKU / CUHK Medicine non-jupas 2024
- University for Psychology

- Why is this security guard like this?
- 57% AI generated score
- Cattolica del Sacro Cuore for medicine - English. Any recommendation or feedback
- Uni assignment
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- UKWPMED Applicants
- How important is attendance when applying to university?
- University of Oxford - Applications - Would I be considered?
- 2023 Lloyd's of London Insurance Graduate Scheme
- Scared of failing uni