Defences for not implementing a directive??
If member states have failed to implement a directive with the reasons being:
'taken time to form a government, which has caused a significant backlog in the passing of all legislation'
and
'protracted negotiations with construction and property development companies, who have reacted angrily to the proposals, threatening to cease all construction projects if the directive was implemented' -- what possible defences and rights could they have against the EC??
'taken time to form a government, which has caused a significant backlog in the passing of all legislation'
and
'protracted negotiations with construction and property development companies, who have reacted angrily to the proposals, threatening to cease all construction projects if the directive was implemented' -- what possible defences and rights could they have against the EC??
Quick Reply
Related discussions
- EU LAW
- Edexcel A Level History American Dream Essay
- How to score high achieve 7 - Damsel In Distress!
- Unit 14 IT Service Delivery Part A Question
- Ocr a level law predictions 2023
- What do you think TSR is missing? 2024 EDITION
- GCSE English Language Creative Writing Piece
- AQA A Level Law Paper 1 26th May 2023
- can someone offer feedback on my 12 marker? Geog A level edexcel
- A level business AQA - 25 marker help
- OU plagiarism policy and application
- Where can I look for a good holiday that is not way too expensive?
- Small claims issue - help
- really worried about getting a job
- Experiences at Cranfield University (Shrivenham)?
- Does anyone have Law a level essay writing techniques??
- British NASA
- gcse mock science revision
- Insanity defence as a loophole EPQ
- Five SAS soldiers arrested for alleged war crimes in Syria
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 week ago
OCR A-level Law Paper 3 (H418/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]Trending
Last reply 1 week ago
OCR A-level Law Paper 3 (H418/03) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat]
