Surgery that could allow trans women to have children of their own...

http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/22/revolutionary-new-surgery-could-allow-trans-women-to-carry-children-5519000/

What do you think of this?
sounds really good to me :smile:

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Blondie987

Sounds fantastic! Especially after watching the Danish Girl :redface:

Reply 2

DedicatedWizard

This is amazing, I hope people will be more accepting of trans women now...

Reply 3

Plantagenet Crown

Incredible, the technology we're developing is astounding.

Reply 4

Blue_Mason

This is wrong on so many levels

(edited 8 years ago)

Reply 5

loveleest

Original post by Blue_Mason

This is wrong on so many levels

Why?

Reply 6

batoot

at first, I was like errrrrrrr

"A 26-year-old woman who is undergoing the screening process told The Times: ‘I crave that experience.
‘I want the morning sickness, the backaches, the feet swelling. I want to feel the baby move. That is something I’ve wanted for as long as I can remember.’"

after reading this I'm starting to change my mind

Reply 7

Blue_Mason

Original post by loveleest

Why?

I do not see in why a trans woman should be given the right to conceive, as it goes against nature

Reply 8

Ascend

Original post by Blue_Mason

I do not see in why a trans woman should be given the right to conceive, as it goes against nature

I do not see why you should be given the right to vaccinations and antibiotics or just about any medical treatment, as it goes against nature.

Reply 9

Sun Ras

Original post by Blue_Mason

I do not see in why a trans woman should be given the right to conceive, as it goes against nature

You just went full Amish, man. Never go full Amish.

Spoiler

Reply 10

GoldenFang

Original post by loveleest

http://metro.co.uk/2015/11/22/revolutionary-new-surgery-could-allow-trans-women-to-carry-children-5519000/

What do you think of this?
sounds really good to me :smile:

It's disgusting. There have been womb transplants to ciswomen, and even there I'm doubtful of the justifiability of such a procedure when surrogacy is available.

It seems like we are using medical technology to allow someone to pretend to be something they are no (a biological female). I am generally supportive of trans rights, but I don't think this is any way justifiable in terms of the risk to the offspring

Reply 11

Trapz99

Only real women (women who were born with female reproductive organs) should be able to have children. That is what God intended.

(edited 7 years ago)

Reply 12

BaconandSauce

This is good news.

If god didn't make such bad mistakes we wouldn't need to correct them

Reply 13

Trapz99

Original post by BaconandSauce

This is good news.

If god didn't make such bad mistakes we wouldn't need to correct them

Don't blame God for this. God is perfect and does not make mistakes. The trans people are to blame for this. They need to accept that they were made to be male if they have the male reproductive parts instead of rebelling against their Creator and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

Reply 14

ByronicHero

Fantastic, though I'm not convinced I would want it funded by the NHS.

Reply 15

BaconandSauce

Original post by Trapz99

Don't blame God for this. God is perfect and does not make mistakes.

OMG (or OYG)

you are joking aren't you

Science has spent generations correcting his very sloppy work

Reply 16

Trapz99

Original post by BaconandSauce

OMG (or OYG)

you are joking aren't you

Science has spent generations correcting his very sloppy work

Nope. God is right.

Reply 17

loveleest

Original post by Trapz99

This is actually horrendous. Only real women (women who were born with female reproductive organs) should be able to have children. That is what God intended. If you disagree with that then you are deluded imo