There are pros and cons to both, and if you're a fresh graduate or apprentice who will be moving between sites/locations early on in your career, or want the option to work in different cities, it makes more sense to rent, but in the current environment with rapidly rising house prices and rents you could argue that it generally makes more sense to buy, if you can afford it.
But that mightn't always be the case. I think (hope!) that people are slowly beginning to see that successive governments have repeatedly shown themselves inept when it comes to managing the provision of the supply of new homes, and pressure may come from two groups of people in the future to open it to the market.
The first is Middle England, who will be fed up with having their children staying at home well into their twenties and maybe into their thirties too, as they are increasingly being priced out of their own property, or have to receive help from the bank of mum and dad.
The second are professionals who are growing increasingly discontented with flat-sharing and house-sharing into their thirties and beyond. These are people with skills, qualifications and jobs, who yesteryear would have been on the path to owning a fairly decent sized property but now are increasingly facing the prospect of their living standards more closely resembling their student lives than what their professional parents would have experienced at their age.
Lower earners will probably continue to have their housing rents subsidised, to increasing amounts, which may also trigger taxpayers alliance types, too, as increasingly large amounts of government spending goes into the pockets of landlords.
You'll notice I have conflated house prices with rent prices, but these are both rising due to the same cause: an artificial scarcity of homes.