yeah that was for d = 1/parallax but the question after, gave the absolute magnitude and the apparent was 0 and you needed to find distance, which i used that formula...
the hubble constant question was easier than i though it would be...
got the age of the universe to be 4 x 10^17s and thats right....i just said that, 1/Ho gave universe age and also critical density could be calculated from Ho...
they gave the absolute magnitude to be something like 0.58
yeah that was for d = 1/parallax but the question after, gave the absolute magnitude and the apparent was 0 and you needed to find distance, which i used that formula...
Yeah so what did everyone get for the distance of Vega using the magnituide equation? I got 7.7 p.c
hmm, not bad altogether. I think some things went badly, some things went well. I wasn't sure of the whole atmosphere stuff, made it up, and I got 1.4ms^-1 for speed of Earth, which i think may be a little slow. The synoptic question was nice though.
For the question on critical density...because the critical density is used for the calculation. I thought if the new volume was greater therefore the critical density would decrease so the universe is more likely to be closed or flat.
As for the last synoptic question....if the radius increased by 2 surely the resistance would increase by 4 (R = pl/A) ?
hmm, not bad altogether. I think some things went badly, some things went well. I wasn't sure of the whole atmosphere stuff, made it up, and I got 1.4ms^-1 for speed of Earth, which i think may be a little slow. The synoptic question was nice though.
Yea, I thought the atmosphere one was very odd indeed, can't see many doing well on it. I tried to recall what I knew from chemistry in it and made quite a bit up too.
For the question on critical density...because the critical density is used for the calculation. I thought if the new volume was greater therefore the critical density would decrease so the universe is more likely to be closed or flat.
As for the last synoptic question....if the radius increased by 2 surely the resistance would increase by 4 (R = pl/A) ?
I also put that the universe would be closed/flat due to the critical density.
Yea I'm fairly sure I put that the resistance would increase fourfold too. Made a stupid mistake with the next one on the time taken because I managed to rearrange V=IR wrong lol.
Oh well, I only needed a U I think on that paper to get my uni offer, just depends whether I get an A or not now. Obviously depends how well the practical went though.
with regards the atmosphere one, i remember that one kind of raio waves is deflected off the atmosphere from electronics, however couldn't remember whether it was short wave or long wave... and now cannot remember what was in the question.
For the question on critical density...because the critical density is used for the calculation. I thought if the new volume was greater therefore the critical density would decrease so the universe is more likely to be closed or flat.
if the volume was greater, the density is smaller, i.e. the density of the universe would be less than the critical density, so the universe continues to expand forever and ever and ever, approaching no limit.......therefore its open?
I thought that the universe is closed when density of universe is greater than the critical density, so would contract and end in the big crunch. is this right or have I got it muddled up?
hmm i think i screwed up the very last question. I also got that if the radius increases, the resistance decreases, time taken to heat decreases and i put frequence decreases because it gets stiffer, spring constant increases, but realised that it should increase. oh well. couldn't remember that the galaxy was elliptical, I put spherical