Thank you so so much for this answer!! You’ve helped me understand what criteria is faster than my teacher telling me it’s just “judgement” at the end of every paragraph! I also love how you structure each paragraph I will forever use this.
I just wanted to ask a few questions just to clear things up for myself. I kinda struggle with the basic stuff but understand the content really well.
For the introduction, how would you thread the criteria into it? Something I find sorta difficult. You said introduce 3 points of each paragraph. Does that also mean each point should have a criteria? (This would make sense because I would have to refer back to it as you’ve said)
Now the source question part is confusing 😵*💫 Mostly because we did different time periods. Could you explain more about the scale and scope method within source questions?
One thing you suggested for Paper 1 was write 2 paragraphs on each extract. I was taught to write 3 paragraphs (2 debating paragraphs and 1 just talking about provenance) unlike in Paper 2 & 3 we follow the same structure you’ve recommended. Should I keep it to that? Or change it to your structure? I must say, I do struggle with writing a paragraph with just provenance alone.
So sorry if I asked too many questions, I’m just trying to push my B into an A/A* so every little detail helps. Thank you so much again!