Girl having sex with 10 guys in a week is same as guy having 10 girls in one week?

Are you a gay guy or a girl? Why would a guy be a lock??

He is the one screwing everyone else by nature - evolutional biology works if the males reproduce a lot and the females get pregnant and give birth.

Plus a guy is the one with the appendage, hence the key.

Experience has taught me two things:

1) Once you're no longer a teenager, pulling is basically the same for males and females:

Unless you're a complete dork, if you're willing to settle for whatever you can get your hands on, its extremely easy to pull, whether you're male or female, straight or gay.

If you're picky, and only willing sleep with people who you genuinely find attractive, then it takes a little work to pull, whether you're male or female, straight or gay.

I disagree. It's much harder for men than women.

Much more men than women are willing to have a one night stand. Therefore the market is in the woman's favour. She has the greater power of choice.

Men and women have different roles in the process - the man is the one that is meant to approach, deal with rejection and humiliation, display attractive character traits, deal with her friends, deal with males in her group, etc. The woman doesn't have to do anything but stand around and wait.

Even an average woman could sleep with 10 attractive men a week. For a man to sleep with 10 different attractive women in a week he'd have to be seriously attractive and have a lot of "game."

What "work" does it take for a woman to pull? All she has to do is look vaguely attractive and then wait around

2) I've known my share of slutty girls, and I've known my share of quiet respectable girls. I can tell you now that slutty girls are **** ing boring in bed, compared to the unimaginable filth that your average "nice girl" is into.
The reason is obvious: girls are slutty because they lack confidence and are constantly in need of affection and reassurance. A lack of confidence = rubbish in bed. Never make the mistake of thinking "Oh she's a pole dancer, she must be dirty in bed". Instead think "Oh she's a shy librarian, she must be dirty in bed".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvavPJtSIUM&fmt=34

This sums it up, boys and girls.

my experience with girls has been the complete oppersite. The more sexualy liberated/adventerous ones have been better in bed, and they arn't the boring/quiet type outside of bed 80% of the time.

That's all cliche and perhaps thats your personal experience. But in my experience and the experience of most people I know, then those stereotypical "roles" are nothing but a myth. For example, I'm extremely picky about potential partners, and I still managed to pull quite often when I was single, but I've honestly never gone up and approached a girl in my life.

You're comparing apples with oranges: you're comparing an attractive girl with an unattractive man. Attractive people of both sexes get plenty of attention and offers. Less attractive people don't, and thus have to work harder to impress, or settle for other unattractive partners.

I honestly don't believe the market is in the woman's favour at all. I've never seen anything in over 10 years of going out that backs up that view. Without wishing to sound offensive, perhaps it only seems that way to you because you don't get approached much?

Mostly the guys who complain most about women being frigid and unapproachable when they won't fall for their cheesy lines are the same ones that call them disgusting sluts when they sleep with someone more attractive. And then they wonder why they struggle to score.

That's all cliche and perhaps thats your personal experience. But in my experience and the experience of most people I know, then those stereotypical "roles" are nothing but a myth. For example, I'm extremely picky about potential partners, and I still managed to pull quite often when I was single, but I've honestly never gone up and approached a girl in my life.

You're comparing apples with oranges: you're comparing an attractive girl with an unattractive man. Attractive people of both sexes get plenty of attention and offers. Less attractive people don't, and thus have to work harder to impress, or settle for other unattractive partners.

I honestly don't believe the market is in the woman's favour at all. I've never seen anything in over 10 years of going out that backs up that view. Without wishing to sound offensive, perhaps it only seems that way to you because you don't get approached much?

Mostly the guys who complain most about women being frigid and unapproachable when they won't fall for their cheesy lines are the same ones that call them disgusting sluts when they sleep with someone more attractive. And then they wonder why they struggle to score.

Have you ever considered that your experience is the exception?

Most women don't approach males. Go to any pub or club and you'll see that there's a difference. Men dont get ready for a night out and then sit around waiting for women to approach them. It just doesnt happen like that.



No - I'm saying a girl just has to look average or above, but for a man that isn't enough.




There have been multiple scientific studies to back up that the market is in the woman's favour.

E.g.:

"For instance, in response to the sex request, men indicated an average likelihood of 46, a whopping figure compared with women's average rating of just 4. "
http://www.livescience.com/culture/090811-one-night-stands.html


"There was also a large gender difference in attitudes toward casual sex: Males had considerably more permissive attitudes (d =.81)"
Oliver, Mary B., and Janet S. Hyde. "Gender Differences in Sexuality: A Meta-analysis." Psychological Bulletin 114.1 (1993): 29-51. Print.



"In every case, men preferred significantly larger numbers of sex partners than women"
"Men were more likely than women to consent to sex after knowing a potential partner for time periods ranging from 1 hour to 2 years"
"A diverse range of research findings lead converging support to the notion that men have a specialized psychology that leads them to consent to sex more quickly than women"
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are men really more 'oriented' toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research. Psychology, Evolution, and Gender, 3, 211-239.


"Gender differences are strikingly large for incidences of masturbation and for attitudes about sex in a casual, uncommitted relationship."
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-92.

Women unwilling to admit promiscuity to researcher shock!

morally, socially etc.

yes or no?

Did you even bother to read the research? The reality is the market is in a woman's favour.

You don't even need research to do it - just go outside and you'll see.

Do the maths: every Friday night, X amount of straight 20somethings go out, and Y get laid. Unless there's one guy going round sleeping with 1,000 girls, then 50% are men and 50% are women. Both have made a conscious choice to have sex (hopefully). There are similar numbers of girls and guys around the clubs, so clearly the scoring success rate (Y/X) is equal for both sexes. How can this be indicative of anything other than a neutral market?